gabazz

I have the 16-70. I really like it. It is not the sharpest lens, but it is sharp enough for me. When I travel or go for a day at the park with the kids, I always have it in my bag. At16mm is great ...

I think that the 18-105 is what you should get first if you are interested in video mostly. The Power zoom feature gives you some cool artistic capabilities for B roll. It is great for interviews. ...

The 30mm outperforms the 16-70 in terms of image quality, and it has a shallower DOF, if you would like that. The 50mm f1.8 has more background separation though than the 30mm f1.4. Even though the ...

My 16-70 is not decentered. It is not the sharpest lens, but it is a significant upgrade over the 16-50. The corners are not crazy sharp, but they are nice. If you do not print large images, the ...

If I were in that position, I think I would only carry the A6000 with the 10-18 and one of the standard zooms (18-135, 16-70, 188-105 or 16-55). The convenience of a zoom for going light is ...

That's what I'm using! A 105mm Vivitar Series 1

For photos I use RAW, but I was talking about video colours. The A6000 has limited video colour, while I believe that the others all offer better colours. Also, I was thinking about video eye AF. ...

I'm not sure how effective the IBIS is for macro, most of the times I still have to use very quick shutter speed. I would like IBIS mainly for video, for handheld stuff when running after the kids. ...

You are right, I never had a card fail! I actually like the small body of the A6000, and I am right eyed so I like the rangefinder style. The most attractive feature of the A73 is that it is FF and ...

The a6600 seems to be the most sensible upgrade. I only wish it had dual card slots. What is holding me back is that I have been thinking for a long time about going FF and the price difference ...

I am happy with the a6000 and a5100. I use these for photos ( macro and cars mostly) and videos (playing guitar and of the kids). What I am looking for in the new camera with IBIS. Otherwise I am ...

I really like the 16-70, It stays almost always on the camera since I got it. It is not the sharpest lens, but its a good travel lens. I like the sharpness at 16mm and can take decent portraits at ...

I guess you are right. A very solid kit would be a standard zoom (like OP 18-105), 10-18, and a fast prime like the 24mm or 30mm.

I was referring to the ones mentioned here, the 35mm and 50mm. Because these are so close in focal length to the Sigma 30mm and 56mm, they it does not make sense to have a Sigma and a Sony. Most ...

I'd have to agree that this might be the best option. It might be the one lens that does it all and if budget might be a consideration, you could even sell some of your lenses that this lens might ...

I really like the 16-70. It is a great vacation lens and walk around lens during the day. At 16mm it is decently wide to take a landscape of where you are. And it is also good for portraits. Might ...

the lights are softboxes. Not sure I could get a colour gel because these have large LEDs. I believe that I was about ISO 400 on the 50mm f1.8 and about ISO 1600. Not sure If going higher would ...

With the 16mm I almost did not fit (vertically) because horizontally I have some space. Also, I did not like to look of the shot. I find the closeup to look good (or at least decent/good enough ...

I also got the Sigma 30mm after the Sony 50mm 1.8. I did this because I noticed the limitation of the 50mm being on the telephoto side. Thought I would find something wider lens more useful. But I ...

I was using 2 LED reflectors. I also have a macro ring but I was not using it.