Joined on Mar 13, 2012


Total: 400, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (336 comments in total)
In reply to:

Contra Mundum: A lot more money for minor improvements: DOA.

Read much? This is a huge improvement over the MkI version of this lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 19:22 UTC
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (766 comments in total)

Yashica Minister-D,,, still have it!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 17:34 UTC as 441st comment
In reply to:

Juck: Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

I was referring to the numerous comments disparaging the brand in the comments, not the article, you Bonobo.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: So this makeshift array can take better images of galaxies than the hubble? Something don't add up here ... sounds fishy to me ...

Maxnimo; keep wearing that foil helmet, nutcake.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:07 UTC

Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:06 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

FrankSG: A simple solution to the problem of intrusion on someone's privacy / property. When I was young and hunting with my father, we would always approach the owner of a farm and ask permission to hunt on or near their property. At the worst they would say no, but 95% of the time we got permission, and made a friend by introducing ourselves. Most of the time they would even help us locate a good position for hunting. A little respect and a handshake can go a long way. :-)


Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

endofoto: Full frame camera and lens was this small, after 60 years or so FF cameras are bigger, heavier. This is a shame. Made in occupied Japan is a different dilemma, thousands year old japanese culture became USA toy, what a shame.

They shouldn't have gotten all rowdy then, should they?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: I guess this is like those Sony RX100 V samples from 10 days ago. Or was it the A6500 examples? Except in both those cases those are known sensors and known lenses.

Wow,, 3 sentences without dribbling-on about your sad NX-1. Nice to see you are growing as a person.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:32 UTC
In reply to:

rfsIII: As always, Pentax makes the nicest lenses, why would you buy any other brand?
But please spare us any more of your patriarchy-promoting, capitalism-abetting, pro-dam porn (https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/7034057932/pentax-55-300mm-f4-5-6-3-ed-plm-wr-re-sample-gallery/1816586547). Dams are an abomination and prevent the free migration of salmon which is a much more urgent problem than any creative whim you might be needing to indulge.

Swing and a miss. Seriously, what are you babbling about?

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:28 UTC
In reply to:

Photoman: This was on PetaPixel yesterday...before DP....again

Photoman,, you need a hobby mate.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 02:06 UTC
On a photo in the iPhone 7 Plus Preview Samples sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foxfire235: man that bokeh looks awful.

Considering the camera, it's outstanding,, and that's from someone who hates Apple.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 18:24 UTC
On article Instax goes luxury with Michael Kors collaboration (41 comments in total)

MICHAEL KORS? That's the stupidest thing I've read all day,, and I was just on a NASCAR forum.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 07:05 UTC as 12th comment
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

ChrClowes: They'll sell like hot cakes - and the sad irony is that all the brilliant innovation by the likes of Fuji, Olympus, etc will be swept under the rug in one swoop. Those five letters are like a magnet for the everyday Joe - and this is the biggest magnet in the shop (though not the best, nor the most innovative...but did it ever have to be?)


Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 17:17 UTC
In reply to:

estarkey: Wow! Canon isn't playing this time! I really took note to the 4:3 aspect ratio and IBIS. They have finally took the mirrorless challenge (and m43) seriously!

Wow,, you guys are all experts on a specific feature you've never used, on a camera you've never touched,, and in fact, didn't know existed until 10 minutes ago. Impressive!

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 05:27 UTC
In reply to:

cdembrey: I nave no interest in a M5 w/18-150mm zoom lens. Where are the wide primes??

Both Sony and Fuji have primes available (both OEM and 3rd Party) starting at 12mm. Meh!


Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 05:25 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2128 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valeriu 64: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Gold, and Pentax K-1 only Silver .

As shown, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV it failed the test bike.

Why gold ?

Very strange.

Ahh,, the Pentax fanboys crawl out of the woodwork,,,, complete with foil helmets.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 00:33 UTC
In reply to:

mailman88: I know one thing....getting that close to a rocket launch, took bigtime connections. Most likely illegal access, for a photo-op.
But the pics look great

Mailman. You just got put nicely in your place. You seem like a 'last-word' kinda fellow, but seriously, consider shutting up.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2016 at 21:47 UTC
In reply to:

scastle: Nowhere in the above blurb does it say that it uses Fujifilm Instax Mini film. The word "film" is in fact used once, but I had to reread it to realize that it wasn't a slip. Uh, I thought this site was Digital Photography Review? What's digital about this?

Fascinating, fascinating,, no wait,, that other word,,, 'tedious'.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 19:18 UTC
On article Rebel in your pocket: Canon EOS M3 Review (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peak freak: What the M3 does have in its advantage, is the EF-M 11-22 at about $400.
For under a grand you get a lightweight, high quality wide angle shooter.
Strikes me as an excellent hiking combo.
(I have an EF-S 10-18 for my SL-1, but often find the equivalent 28mm just a bit too short for my single lens desires.)

Agreed,, the EF-M 11-22mm is a superb piece of glass.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

Dave Oddie: So this will have a f.o.v equivalent of 52mm on APS-C and 70mm on m4/3.

Useless focal lengths IMO. Yes I know some people like 50mm "standard" lens but it should really be about 42mm equiv and 70mm equiv on m43 is neither one thing nor the other.

Why they don't make a 28mm or 30mm that would actually function as a true standard for Aps-c and a 20mm for m43?

M43 is always short changed when manufacturers do this. Sticking a m43 mount on the end of lens with a focal length clearly designed for aps-c is a cheap way of tapping into another market but if I were a m43 user I would not want this lens. Though slower, lenses like the 45mm (so 90mm eqiv f.o.v) are much more sensible.

Who took the jam out of this clown's donut?

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2016 at 08:52 UTC
Total: 400, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »