Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 483, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

thx1138: Simply can't be true, Sony reps were boldly claiming Canon lenses work faster on Sony A9 than Canon camera.

Just keep waiting for those Sony 300/400 f/2.8 FE lenses to be announced, won't be too long, now

;o)

"" Sony reps were boldly claiming Canon lenses work faster on Sony A9 than Canon camera""

What are you babbling about?

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2017 at 01:55 UTC
In reply to:

beavertown: Almost 500 comments concerning falsely designed adapters?

You have absolutely zero idea how these adapters work,,, huh?

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2017 at 01:53 UTC

400+ comments about something we all knew would be the case. I'm a Canon shooter,, shot 1-series bodies since the 1-d IIn,,, but I know one thing for sure,,,, Sony are not daft,, the native primes are coming,, and the A9 will truly be a game changer for sports shooters when that happens.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2017 at 22:18 UTC as 94th comment | 3 replies

Can you plebs just say 'cool' instead of acting like little girls with a skinned knee? So what if it's been done before. Or hey,, just say nothing at all. It's actually INTERESTING to some folk.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2017 at 03:53 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2726 comments in total)
In reply to:

ocean1: Thank you for the detailed review I am glad that it is big and detailed as a99II's sould have been ...

The conclusion is that its destroys the 1DXII and its very little behind Nikon's Excellent 3d tracking .

A big introduction into the Pro sports photography for Sony.

As I see it the benefits from quiet shooting and autofocus frame coverage are more importand from the tremendus speed of the camera at least for Wedding and ceremony shooters also of course for spor shooters that can do better compositions with this camera .

Now imaging the second generation body of this camera and you know who will be the New King ... Nikon and canon wake up please!

Ps. Nikon and canon should speed up their researh and development divisions .
A little more innovation especialy from canon that is sleeping will make photography industry shine like the old days that competition was strong between the 2 companies.

Destroys the 1-DX II,,, lol. What a maroon.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 20:27 UTC
On article Shooting experience: how the Nikon D7500 won me over (194 comments in total)
In reply to:

rfsIII: As always, another great story from our PopPhoto alum. They should change his name to Mowtown because he just keeps cranking out the hits.
However, I don't understand why we perpetuate the myth that having multiple camera bodies or big lenses makes you conspicuous. It's not the equipment that makes you stand out, it's your attitude and actions (with the exception of a white EF 800mm f/5.6L IS or similar).
If you clomp into a location elbows out, wearing a lavender spandex dress and making a lot of mouth noises while waving your cameras in everyone's personal space, yes indeed you will be noticed. Fortunately, the opposite is also true. So if people are reacting badly to you and your camera, it's time to take some ballet classes and upgrade your wardrobe.

I'm sure they'd be 'happier' with a '59 Flame Top,, just as I'd be happier with a Phase One IQ3.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2017 at 19:18 UTC
In reply to:

OlyPent: Solid equipment, good value, not DSLR. This is the future.

As long as a DSLR is the right tool for the job,,, and people earn money from doing that job,,, DSLR's are going nowhere. So hey, have a coke and a smile,, and zip it.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2017 at 02:25 UTC
In reply to:

OlyPent: Solid equipment, good value, not DSLR. This is the future.

Nothing wrong with DSLR's.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2017 at 23:32 UTC

Great stuff,,,, I don't shoot Fuji, but robust sales = more choice for photographers. Hard to hate on that,, though some here are trying pretty hard.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2017 at 22:30 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

BobT3218: Halleluiah, a depth of field scale. I can't understand why this feature is not mandatory on all primes. It was once. How difficult can it be?

Don't you actually learn the DOF properties after you've played with the lens a few times? I don't get it. It's never been an issue for me,,, but I'm sure I'm doing it wrong. Educate me, oh wise ones.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2017 at 06:55 UTC
In reply to:

Juck: Cool, I guess? Doesn't the old version sell for like 50 bucks?

OK,, so the modern version is made by currently underpaid German workers. I don't get the whole wringing of hands over the DOF scale thing,, I use a digital camera,,, like most folk,,, once I've shot a lens a few times,, I get used to it's optical properties and unique character. Who needs a DOF scale? Not trying to be funny,, I honestly don't get it.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2017 at 03:36 UTC
In reply to:

BobT3218: Halleluiah, a depth of field scale. I can't understand why this feature is not mandatory on all primes. It was once. How difficult can it be?

How difficult can it be to use a lens that doesn't have a DOF scale?

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2017 at 01:08 UTC

Cool, I guess? Doesn't the old version sell for like 50 bucks?

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2017 at 20:40 UTC as 36th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

barrym1966: Man up, that right is heavier than the lens. Also if you use a proper shutter speed those bombs would have been in focus

haha,, I totally thought they were bombs too at first glance.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2017 at 00:43 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): Old news. This was on Petapixel over a year ago.

Well,, now it is, obv.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 22:51 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): Old news. This was on Petapixel over a year ago.

I didn't see it,, so it's not old to me.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 22:50 UTC
In reply to:

D200_4me: I've seen way too many photos like this on social media. For the first several you see it's pretty cool. But after awhile, you get sick of seeing it. No burning steel wool will be swung around in front of my camera. I've seen too much of it already :-)

@I Have a dream ,,, Adroitly put.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2017 at 08:15 UTC

Great work,, I assume a guy with this resume is using the house strobes.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 23:28 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

D200_4me: I've seen way too many photos like this on social media. For the first several you see it's pretty cool. But after awhile, you get sick of seeing it. No burning steel wool will be swung around in front of my camera. I've seen too much of it already :-)

Geez,, who took the jam out of your donuts?

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2017 at 17:13 UTC
In reply to:

JohnnyFl: Nice now were talking, but Canon please put some money into a developing a decent FF mirrorless ILC camera please!

@Tommi K1,,, Nonsense. The entire TV series House was most certainly NOT shot on a 5D II,,,,, ONE single episode, where he was trapped in a collapsed building was shot on a 5D,,, and that is all.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 23:32 UTC
Total: 483, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »