Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 381, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Dave Oddie: So this will have a f.o.v equivalent of 52mm on APS-C and 70mm on m4/3.

Useless focal lengths IMO. Yes I know some people like 50mm "standard" lens but it should really be about 42mm equiv and 70mm equiv on m43 is neither one thing nor the other.

Why they don't make a 28mm or 30mm that would actually function as a true standard for Aps-c and a 20mm for m43?

M43 is always short changed when manufacturers do this. Sticking a m43 mount on the end of lens with a focal length clearly designed for aps-c is a cheap way of tapping into another market but if I were a m43 user I would not want this lens. Though slower, lenses like the 45mm (so 90mm eqiv f.o.v) are much more sensible.

Who took the jam out of this clown's donut?

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2016 at 08:52 UTC
In reply to:

rfsIII: Vindication! At last a lens that will make people take the EOS M seriously.

What are you dribbling about rfs? The 11-22mm EF-M is an astonishing lens,, the 22mm f2 is no slouch either.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 16:56 UTC
On article Trippy mirrored timelapse turns Hong Kong upside down (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

quietrich: Techie visual gymnastics, more like an advert for financial services than anything meaningful. Nice advert though.

It doesn't have to be meaningful,, it's called fun,, look into it.

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2016 at 18:41 UTC
In reply to:

Richard Murdey: Hey dpreview,

Maybe you should spend a little time coming up with some editorial policy on linking to photos obtained illegally.

I mean I'm guessing that if I snuck into a US navel base and took some photos of, I dunno, nuclear missiles being loaded onto a submarine, you probably would be reluctant to link to that content. How about pics from my last safari where I poached some nice rhino horns?

While at first glance it might seem that urban explorers who are trespassing on what is clearly derelict property aren't doing anything wrong, personally I find the present situation of illegally photographing abandoned Japanese communities in the Fukushima exclusion zone (while making crass comments about how he is amazed people hadn't already stolen the laptops and cash he came across) to be offensive on any number of levels, and I would really prefer you didn't give him a platform.

Please think about it. Thanks...

Hey Dick, this is a website about photography, those are photographs, zip it.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 06:39 UTC
In reply to:

phoenix15: Sorry, he is very stup*d entering red zone without proper permit from local authority. If the radiation is still there at high dose, he should cover his body entirely. I don't understand what he was looking for ?

He was looking to tell a story using his camera. I'd say he did that.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2016 at 17:25 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2660 comments in total)

So, just for landscapes and fanboys.

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2016 at 21:03 UTC as 380th comment | 2 replies
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: Disclaimer: I couldn't care less about DXO rankings or Canikon war.

But last time I checked DP review's studio test, Nikon D5 was clearly ahead in High ISO vs the 1DX II.

Yup, just checked again. Almost a full stop ahead (RAW, print size, low light setting).

Comparing D5's ISO 200k vs 1DX II's ISO 100k.

Why is DXO ranking the D5 lower in High ISO is beyond me.

Anyone?

If you think that's aggression, you've led a very sheltered life. Judging a sensor by comparing those ISO's is like choosing a Ferrari over a Corvette based on how fast it drives across a muddy field. Asinine.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2016 at 19:28 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edgar_in_Indy: A few of the world's best kept secrets: The formula for Coca-Cola, KFC’s 11 Herbs and Spices, and, of course, the Pentax 645z's DxOMark score...

...but hey, we mustn't waste any time before trumpeting the Canon EOS 1D X II scores!

Keep wearing that foil helmet.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2016 at 02:22 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: Disclaimer: I couldn't care less about DXO rankings or Canikon war.

But last time I checked DP review's studio test, Nikon D5 was clearly ahead in High ISO vs the 1DX II.

Yup, just checked again. Almost a full stop ahead (RAW, print size, low light setting).

Comparing D5's ISO 200k vs 1DX II's ISO 100k.

Why is DXO ranking the D5 lower in High ISO is beyond me.

Anyone?

Comparing ISO 100,000 vs 200,000? Do you have a head injury?

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2016 at 02:22 UTC
On article The price is right: Canon EOS Rebel T6 / 1300D Review (420 comments in total)
In reply to:

PKDanny: Canon still use old sensor.

and?

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 05:28 UTC
In reply to:

Juck: I love this!! ,, simply because it makes all you armchair Ansel Adams' so very angry. lol ,, noone is making you use it,,, go home.

Swing and a miss.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2016 at 02:53 UTC
In reply to:

David Kinston: In our family there are 3 different recent Nikon cameras, from the D7200 to the D750. Tamron, Sigma and Tokina lenses as well as Nikon. Never any issues.

Plainly CANON is the problem! They like making life difficult for their competitors - and we photographers are the ones suffering.

Wow, what planet do you live on? How is Canon the bad guy here? Making things difficult for their competitors? How very dare they! What is this? Some kind of business?

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2016 at 02:51 UTC

I love this!! ,, simply because it makes all you armchair Ansel Adams' so very angry. lol ,, noone is making you use it,,, go home.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2016 at 04:27 UTC as 56th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

John _ Finn: Impressive specs but very few photographers require that level of functionality in a flash unit. I'll stick to YongNuos - they deliver all that I need for a fraction of the cost.

You knew that already, noone else cares.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 19:39 UTC
In reply to:

loitokitok: What some of you guys with your oh so sarcastically crafted comments conveniently seem to forget is that nobody, not even Leica, is forcing you to buy this product. Take it or leave it and move on.

But I certainly applaud them for giving you a subject on which to practice your wit.

So only folk who buy a product are allowed an opinion? You are a tool.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2016 at 21:17 UTC
On article Huawei clarifies Leica-involvement in P9 camera design (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeF4Black: So, as I understand, Leica sent over one young high potential, he was given a tour of the factory, skirting the R&D department, and then sent on a bar brawl?

Swing and a miss.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2016 at 04:58 UTC

That selfie stick didn't make me want to push them off that cliff at all.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2016 at 01:53 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Juck: As someone pointed out on thedigitalpicture site,,, the exif on provided samples pics prove the samples have been extensively, almost comically, photoshopped.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=17853

Androole,,, real the exif again nimrod,,, you do know how to read it right?

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2016 at 03:24 UTC

As someone pointed out on thedigitalpicture site,,, the exif on provided samples pics prove the samples have been extensively, almost comically, photoshopped.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=17853

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 18:44 UTC as 41st comment | 13 replies
Total: 381, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »