Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 389, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Super Bowl Halftime lit up by choreographed drone show (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

G1Houston: It was innovative, spectacular, and fun to watch. I am a late Gaga fan. She is not just a pop star. She was a child prodigy and recruited together with Mark Zuckerberg in a study of child prodigy by John Hopkins in the 1980s (http://www.nature.com/news/how-to-raise-a-genius-lessons-from-a-45-year-study-of-super-smart-children-1.20537). She is classically trained in voice and piano.

Gaga is rubbish, When she's not using autotune, she sings through her nose. Her music is really quite awful.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 07:57 UTC
On article Super Bowl Halftime lit up by choreographed drone show (102 comments in total)

Neat

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 07:54 UTC as 12th comment
In reply to:

Robert A: Anyone happen to notice that B&H hiked the price to $1,999? I've been exploring 6x7 quite a bit recently, but my leanings are toward the Mamiya 7 for the ability to change lenses. It'd be difficult to be locked into 80mm (42e) without any ability to go wider.

Hiked it to $2199 now.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 19:16 UTC
In reply to:

Cameracist: Wonder how it works on Sony a7...

Yeah Brendon,, read some of HAR's 15,100 posts,,, educate yourself! lol

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 06:31 UTC

Bravo,, wonderful images. I'm not going to scroll through the comments,, I can only imagine the childlike pointless criticisms from the usual 'Armchair Ansels' we have here.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 18:01 UTC as 43rd comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS II USM sample gallery (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mister Joseph: Had a Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 VC which I bought for CAD$360 (US$274) brand new on amazon.ca. It had great IQ, awesome VC, ok AF speed, and a price I cannot refuse. Practically glued to the D610 (don't have it anymore) as a 'walkaround lens'

You knew that already,,, noone else cares.

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 18:26 UTC
In reply to:

janist74: " This image is why the world needs professional photographers "
Maybe (and sadly) I'm alone with this, but i don't need pictures like this, not at all.

Yup, just close your curtains and hide from the world behind the sofa.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 22:17 UTC
In reply to:

Abdallah II: yes the world also needs a professional areal photographer to bring us a photo of a bomber plane because a photo of a fighter pilot who pulls a trigger and drop a bomb in a residential area that kills 100s of innocent people even more powerful then this brave photographers photo of killing a civilian, like WW2 atomic bomber dropping on Japan. i wonder how far humans will reach away from humanity......?

Thanks for that, Captain Bringdown.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 21:55 UTC
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (333 comments in total)
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: 'Best 35mm lens available' - Really??? Maybe if you're sticking to DSLR lenses. I would put my Zeiss 35mm 1.4 ZM against this Canon.

This new Canon lens slaughters the Zeiss in every conceivable way.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 19:26 UTC
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (333 comments in total)
In reply to:

Contra Mundum: A lot more money for minor improvements: DOA.

Read much? This is a huge improvement over the MkI version of this lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 19:22 UTC
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (765 comments in total)

Yashica Minister-D,,, still have it!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 17:34 UTC as 441st comment
In reply to:

Juck: Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

I was referring to the numerous comments disparaging the brand in the comments, not the article, you Bonobo.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: So this makeshift array can take better images of galaxies than the hubble? Something don't add up here ... sounds fishy to me ...

Maxnimo; keep wearing that foil helmet, nutcake.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:07 UTC

Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:06 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

FrankSG: A simple solution to the problem of intrusion on someone's privacy / property. When I was young and hunting with my father, we would always approach the owner of a farm and ask permission to hunt on or near their property. At the worst they would say no, but 95% of the time we got permission, and made a friend by introducing ourselves. Most of the time they would even help us locate a good position for hunting. A little respect and a handshake can go a long way. :-)

What?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

endofoto: Full frame camera and lens was this small, after 60 years or so FF cameras are bigger, heavier. This is a shame. Made in occupied Japan is a different dilemma, thousands year old japanese culture became USA toy, what a shame.

They shouldn't have gotten all rowdy then, should they?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: I guess this is like those Sony RX100 V samples from 10 days ago. Or was it the A6500 examples? Except in both those cases those are known sensors and known lenses.

Wow,, 3 sentences without dribbling-on about your sad NX-1. Nice to see you are growing as a person.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:32 UTC
In reply to:

rfsIII: As always, Pentax makes the nicest lenses, why would you buy any other brand?
But please spare us any more of your patriarchy-promoting, capitalism-abetting, pro-dam porn (https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/7034057932/pentax-55-300mm-f4-5-6-3-ed-plm-wr-re-sample-gallery/1816586547). Dams are an abomination and prevent the free migration of salmon which is a much more urgent problem than any creative whim you might be needing to indulge.

Swing and a miss. Seriously, what are you babbling about?

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:28 UTC
In reply to:

Photoman: This was on PetaPixel yesterday...before DP....again

Photoman,, you need a hobby mate.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 02:06 UTC
On a photo in the iPhone 7 Plus Preview Samples sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foxfire235: man that bokeh looks awful.

Considering the camera, it's outstanding,, and that's from someone who hates Apple.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 18:24 UTC
Total: 389, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »