Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 416, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On a photo in the Sony a9 real world samples gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

scokill: Looks terrible. This isn't going to attract sports shooters.

Did you bang your head on something? It looks fine for ISO 12,800

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 16:54 UTC
In reply to:

shigzeo: Really wish these third party 'native' lenses would incorporate native electronics to allow automatic stop down rather than forcing users to turn a 2017 camera into a 1960s SLR.

Don;t worry noob,, shoot enough,, you'll know instinctively,

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 01:48 UTC
In reply to:

panchorancho: Now this is what mirrorless is all about! Better than Sony's A9 which is a half-baked attempt at making a sports camera! Go Fuji!

The comically slow RAW buffer flush speed makes the A9 all but unusable to most sports shooters,,, not even a quarter baked.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 01:47 UTC
On article Sony a9: Why being better might not be enough (764 comments in total)
In reply to:

John C Tharp: Can we get more clarification on limitations to adapting with the LA-EA3, specifically with the 300/2.8 and 500/4 lenses that are not replicated in E-mount?

The article states that subject tracking (Lock-on AF) is not available- what kind of tracking is available, if any, and will this be of any use to sports shooters wanting to use these lenses?

I get that Sony is pushing the speed aspect of the A9 to compare with pro cameras, but of what use is that to sport shooters using their longer lenses if the available functionality is so limited?

The chronically slow flushing of the buffer (during which the camera is unusable) is the Achilles heel,, a deal breaker for most sports photographers.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2017 at 20:05 UTC
On article Sony a9 first look videos (300 comments in total)
In reply to:

rialcnis: To whoever ridiculed me discussing the a9 a couple weeks ago, saying it didn't exist.....a big LOL.

Famous old koan, "If you see the horns of a bull, above a fence, there is a bull behind the fence."

A9 looks like a fine camera, but it is no 1-DX rival. It doesn't have the super teles' and the RAW buffer flush speed on the A9 is useless, bordering on comical.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2017 at 02:56 UTC
On article Canon will add C-Log to the EOS 5D Mark IV for $99 (462 comments in total)
In reply to:

henrikbengtsson: Voila! The app-concept for cameras is here. In the future, the default software offered will be basic with optional downloadable functionality ($$) for a custom setup.

It's a hardware upgrade, numbnuts. READ the article.

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 18:58 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1878 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: Booyaaa C&N, A9 in your face!!!!

Booyaa Sony,,,, 400mm f2.8, 500mm & 600mm f4 Lenses in your face!!!! Won't be seeing A9's replace many D5/1DX-II in pro sports anytime soon.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 19:47 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1878 comments in total)
In reply to:

LukeDuciel: Why the whole announcement appears in such a hassle? Does the stole truck carry many A9 cameras, so Sony has to move up the announcement?

Ahh, thanks.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 17:01 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1878 comments in total)
In reply to:

LukeDuciel: Why the whole announcement appears in such a hassle? Does the stole truck carry many A9 cameras, so Sony has to move up the announcement?

What?

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 16:16 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1878 comments in total)

Whoa

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 16:11 UTC as 340th comment
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (300 comments in total)
In reply to:

PhotoCGI: They've got to be kidding.
Exciting concept and all but my questions as a potential consumer:
-Why pay $1700 for a product from a company without prior experience in the camera market?
-What are the chances something can go wrong with this device vs a tried and tested DSLR or MLC? --About 16 to 1 chances I'd say-
-What about image quality? Will these tiny plastic lenses really rival images produced with high quality optics and leading apsc or fullframe sensors?
-Why they don't dare to show a full size L16 gallery for us to see? If the product is so amazing as claimed, wouldn't it be the first thing to show?
-What if I want to use an ultra wide angle, a fisheye or extreme telezoom? Should I go and spend more money on another system camera because this device won't accept the lenses I want or need?
There will people interested, sure. Early adopters with money to burn. But at $1700 a piece, they are not going to sell well. Heck, not even at half that price.

If people like you were the leading innovators in our species, we'd all still be in a cave banging rocks together.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 02:09 UTC
In reply to:

wildbild: hm. don't know. sample images look somewhat soulless.

Ugh, you want soulless? Check this crap out:

https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/9282772032/photos/2314573/

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 20:10 UTC
In reply to:

Chev Chelios: Is this lens really what EF-S system owners having been crying out for?

Canon had a 9 year head start on Fuji with their APS-C lens system. Fuji X now has 5 prime lenses which are 35mm or wider that have apertures of f2 or wider. Fuji also has an ultra wide 14mm f2.8.

Canon on the other hand STILL has no fast wide angle EF-S primes. If you want faster than f2.8 in a prime you need to pay much more to get the larger and bulkier L equivalent.

Stop whining

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2017 at 07:03 UTC
In reply to:

Lensmate: Good fun, but nothing new, as Banksy had been doing this sort of thing since the 90's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy

OK,, I'll bite,,,, how is this even remotely like Banksy's use of stencils?,, which, incidentally, have been used since the stone age. Your boy Banksy might be an ace with the social commentary,, but he's not exactly breaking new ground with technique,, graffiti artists have been using stencils for 50+ years.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 06:45 UTC

Bravo

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 17:22 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

HeyItsJoel: Those cutouts look like photoshop work to me instead of actual paper. Just sayin'.

No they don't. Don't you have anything better to do?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 17:22 UTC
In reply to:

jcolwell: Typo error in the DPR article, para.2: "T-SE", should be "TS-E".

Thanks for that, now the world can continue about it's business safely. PHEW!

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2017 at 04:13 UTC
In reply to:

Jono Slack: Great article, but it seems to presuppose that we all need more resolution and dynamic range and less depth of field.
I have an incredibly detailed 6 foot print from a 5 year old 18mp (ff) camera on my wall which I look at every time I'm tempted by medium format.
We buy these cameras and zoom in to 100% to ooh and ahh and then post them on flickr ...... or maybe we print them to A1? (24mp will do just fine)
I've never seen a poor image saved by high DR or resolution, and I've never seen a good one spoiled by the lack of it

Steady now,, that's more common sense than most folk here can handle.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 07:03 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

Richard Murdey: I like these results a lot more than the Pentax KP gallery posted recently. Similar shots and conditions, so the comparison is fair I think.

I can't put my finger on why exactly. The Canon results just seem to have a more natural representation of color brightness and light dynamics generally. Bright looks bright, with a realistic sense of depth to the shadows. The KP seemed similar to recent Fuji output in "look", with an overly glossy, flat overlay which is attractive in a magazine cover kind of way but felt over-processed to me.

The 77D images aren't 'very soft' ,, what are you babbling about?

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 06:21 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nojo: It appears to me that no care was taken at all considering settings, I would have to gather that all the pictures were taken with automatic settings and no manual adjustment.

Having used a T5i with the same lens I have had far better results, though I use mostly manual settings or at some times will optimize automatic settings. Certainly with better results. I seriously doubt that the 77D performs worse than the T5i.

Thanks for that Ansel, let me get you your medal,,, there you go,, the 'No-one Gives a Damn Cross'.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 01:11 UTC
Total: 416, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »