Juck

Joined on Mar 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 386, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Cameracist: Wonder how it works on Sony a7...

Yeah Brendon,, read some of HAR's 15,100 posts,,, educate yourself! lol

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 06:31 UTC

Bravo,, wonderful images. I'm not going to scroll through the comments,, I can only imagine the childlike pointless criticisms from the usual 'Armchair Ansels' we have here.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 18:01 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS II USM sample gallery (131 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mister Joseph: Had a Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 VC which I bought for CAD$360 (US$274) brand new on amazon.ca. It had great IQ, awesome VC, ok AF speed, and a price I cannot refuse. Practically glued to the D610 (don't have it anymore) as a 'walkaround lens'

You knew that already,,, noone else cares.

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2017 at 18:26 UTC
In reply to:

janist74: " This image is why the world needs professional photographers "
Maybe (and sadly) I'm alone with this, but i don't need pictures like this, not at all.

Yup, just close your curtains and hide from the world behind the sofa.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 22:17 UTC
In reply to:

Abdallah II: yes the world also needs a professional areal photographer to bring us a photo of a bomber plane because a photo of a fighter pilot who pulls a trigger and drop a bomb in a residential area that kills 100s of innocent people even more powerful then this brave photographers photo of killing a civilian, like WW2 atomic bomber dropping on Japan. i wonder how far humans will reach away from humanity......?

Thanks for that, Captain Bringdown.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 21:55 UTC
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (327 comments in total)
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: 'Best 35mm lens available' - Really??? Maybe if you're sticking to DSLR lenses. I would put my Zeiss 35mm 1.4 ZM against this Canon.

This new Canon lens slaughters the Zeiss in every conceivable way.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 19:26 UTC
On article The whole nine yards: Canon 35mm F1.4L II USM review (327 comments in total)
In reply to:

Contra Mundum: A lot more money for minor improvements: DOA.

Read much? This is a huge improvement over the MkI version of this lens.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2016 at 19:22 UTC
On article DPReview Asks: What was your first camera? (764 comments in total)

Yashica Minister-D,,, still have it!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 17:34 UTC as 440th comment
In reply to:

Juck: Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

I was referring to the numerous comments disparaging the brand in the comments, not the article, you Bonobo.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: So this makeshift array can take better images of galaxies than the hubble? Something don't add up here ... sounds fishy to me ...

Maxnimo; keep wearing that foil helmet, nutcake.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:07 UTC

Who cares what brand the lenses are? This is very, very cool.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 17:06 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

FrankSG: A simple solution to the problem of intrusion on someone's privacy / property. When I was young and hunting with my father, we would always approach the owner of a farm and ask permission to hunt on or near their property. At the worst they would say no, but 95% of the time we got permission, and made a friend by introducing ourselves. Most of the time they would even help us locate a good position for hunting. A little respect and a handshake can go a long way. :-)

What?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

endofoto: Full frame camera and lens was this small, after 60 years or so FF cameras are bigger, heavier. This is a shame. Made in occupied Japan is a different dilemma, thousands year old japanese culture became USA toy, what a shame.

They shouldn't have gotten all rowdy then, should they?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: I guess this is like those Sony RX100 V samples from 10 days ago. Or was it the A6500 examples? Except in both those cases those are known sensors and known lenses.

Wow,, 3 sentences without dribbling-on about your sad NX-1. Nice to see you are growing as a person.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:32 UTC
In reply to:

rfsIII: As always, Pentax makes the nicest lenses, why would you buy any other brand?
But please spare us any more of your patriarchy-promoting, capitalism-abetting, pro-dam porn (https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/7034057932/pentax-55-300mm-f4-5-6-3-ed-plm-wr-re-sample-gallery/1816586547). Dams are an abomination and prevent the free migration of salmon which is a much more urgent problem than any creative whim you might be needing to indulge.

Swing and a miss. Seriously, what are you babbling about?

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2016 at 21:28 UTC
In reply to:

Photoman: This was on PetaPixel yesterday...before DP....again

Photoman,, you need a hobby mate.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 02:06 UTC
On a photo in the iPhone 7 Plus Preview Samples sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Foxfire235: man that bokeh looks awful.

Considering the camera, it's outstanding,, and that's from someone who hates Apple.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 18:24 UTC
On article Instax goes luxury with Michael Kors collaboration (41 comments in total)

MICHAEL KORS? That's the stupidest thing I've read all day,, and I was just on a NASCAR forum.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 07:05 UTC as 12th comment
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

ChrClowes: They'll sell like hot cakes - and the sad irony is that all the brilliant innovation by the likes of Fuji, Olympus, etc will be swept under the rug in one swoop. Those five letters are like a magnet for the everyday Joe - and this is the biggest magnet in the shop (though not the best, nor the most innovative...but did it ever have to be?)

Huh?

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 17:17 UTC
In reply to:

estarkey: Wow! Canon isn't playing this time! I really took note to the 4:3 aspect ratio and IBIS. They have finally took the mirrorless challenge (and m43) seriously!

Wow,, you guys are all experts on a specific feature you've never used, on a camera you've never touched,, and in fact, didn't know existed until 10 minutes ago. Impressive!

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 05:27 UTC
Total: 386, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »