Pontoneer

Lives in United Kingdom Ayrshire, United Kingdom
Works as a Audio-Visual Engineer
Joined on Aug 19, 2006

Comments

Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (813 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pontoneer: Smaller than the average DSLR ? Unless the model in the photos has tiny hands , that thing looks pretty big to me , certainly bigger than my Pentax K-3 , which I'd say is on the big side of 'the average DSLR' , albeit smaller than some others out there .

See the two side by side ; there are lots of smaller DSLR's , and a few that are much bigger . I'd define 'average' as something like Pentax K50 or Nikon D90 and am only taking issue with the statement in the review .

I do think the new Hassy looks like a fine camera and am a fan as I used to shoot 500CM's in a previous employment .

Here's the comparison
http://camerasize.com/compare/#485,678

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 09:12 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (813 comments in total)

Smaller than the average DSLR ? Unless the model in the photos has tiny hands , that thing looks pretty big to me , certainly bigger than my Pentax K-3 , which I'd say is on the big side of 'the average DSLR' , albeit smaller than some others out there .

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2016 at 11:15 UTC as 106th comment | 4 replies

Why should Nikon be getting upset because another maker's camera looks a bit similar to one of theirs ? All cameras perform much the same function so it follows that they will share similarities to a greater or lesser degree .

By Nikon's reasoning , Pentax should be upset at every other maker who produced an SLR after they made the first one .

Not all manufacturers are precious and petty though .

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2013 at 11:25 UTC as 56th comment | 2 replies
On article Pro DSLRs, Pro Photographers (99 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rick Knepper: I read nothing in this article regarding the tools of the trade that wouldn't also be a concern for a typical advanced non-professional. What does being a professional have to do with needing the smallest possible shutter lag?

One concern expressed in the article was the cameras' "durability" in the field. These unquailfied opinions encourages the makers to continue to produce too large, too heavy (emphasis on the "too heavy") bricks. Sure, I want 5 star crash test ratings in my automobiles, but I don't want to drive a Humvee to get it. C&N need to do more R&D in this area.

Quite - I had the misfortune of being handed a D2 with huge lens to do a job a few weeks ago . After a couple of hours my arms and shoulders were aching ; no wonder its owner is regularly complaining of backache !

I certainly couldn't live with 'bricks' like these every day . Nikon at least , and possibly Canon too , need to take a leaf out of Pentax' book : class leading cameras don't need to be bulky and heavy .

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 08:27 UTC

SeeRoy , some of these upmarket domestic or 'semi-pro' camcorders do have remote control mini jack sockets and zoom demand remote accessories ,

Some tripod makers , such as Manfrotto , also make accessory panning handles with zoom remote and other functions built in .

I agree with your comments about stability , which is generally best with a heavier ENG type camcorder , although these days I am happier to lug around something smaller and lighter and use either a monopod , tripod or a steadicam type rig where required .

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 19:13 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5