-
These lenses are both way above the resolution threshold where you will see the difference (and I’m guessing Lenstios small differences just reflect slight expected sample variation - Sonys own ...
-
370 grams of external cosmetic metal is probably the difference.
-
Sure, but there’s still the profile issue. Conversion to positive goes via some set of defaults, and along with the massive variation in development depending on how you choose to do that (given...
-
The idea that these images show that the film is less contrasty seems odd. That will entirely depend on the developer used, temperature and time. And indeed on the profile used after scanning to...
-
I know only that they haven’t because there aren’t any. Of course they might in the future, and might have plans. But that’s nothing we can be sure about until it happens.
-
It’s true they have prohibited reverse engineered third part lenses - but since they don’t license or share specs with the main high quality third party makers, that’s aLmost the same as...
-
The size of eg f11 aperture openings is exactly the same regardless of the maximum aperture of the lens.
-
He’s done the mathematics, it’s about 1:3 at 70 mm, less than 1:4 at the wide end.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
1703 |
Threads started |
72 |
Last post |
2 days ago |
Entries |
4 |
Votes cast |
150 |
Last entry |
Feb 17, 2009 |
|