supeyugin1

Lives in United States Santa Clara, CA, United States
Joined on Mar 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 796, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Franz Weber: I am not sure if I understood Tim correctly:
Did he say “We at Apple create products to enrich peoples live“, or did he say “We at Apple create products for rich people, right?“

So hard to grasp!

Yes, to enrich his life.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2021 at 20:49 UTC
In reply to:

iShootWideOpen: What is the focal length for the mid-wide lens? Also while I like the 77mm short tele, I will surely miss the old 56mm tele.

56mm is not a tele.

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2021 at 20:45 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV review (931 comments in total)

How this compares to Panasonic GX9 and G95. Trying to choose between those 3 and also considering Fuji X-S10, although all of them more expensive than EM10. Trying to stay more compact and lightweight, this body piqued my attention.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2021 at 01:05 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies

I want an ILP (Interchangeable lens phone)! I think Samsung patented one, based on NX-M mount, which was very slim. Still have Samsung NX Mini, and it's amazingly slim. Maybe the slimmest camera with 1" sensor.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2021 at 01:48 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Photodog2: We used to have phones that happen to have a camera. Now, we are going to end up with cameras that happen to have a smart phone.

@lattesweden. I still have that Samsung hybrid with a real zoom lens, it's called Galaxy K Zoom, which have 24-240mm f/3.1-6.3 lens with OIS, removable battery, xenon flash. It was not bad at all. Too bad Samsung stopped making those.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2021 at 01:44 UTC
In reply to:

Andyyy: I always wanted a phone with an 1 inch sensor camera. Unfortunately this will be so expensive that i rather buy a good phone and a compact camera for probably less money.

Yes, I bought one from B&H for $370 and from Adorama for the same price.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2021 at 00:47 UTC

Fuji finally catches up with Samsung, 5 years later.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2021 at 12:53 UTC as 26th comment
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV review (931 comments in total)

That's the camera i was waiting for. Probably the last body from Olympus.
Will it support dual IS with Panasonic lenses?
This or GX9?

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2020 at 17:25 UTC as 90th comment | 1 reply

Damn, I was waiting for E-M10 mk IV! Not gonna happen anymore.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2020 at 18:12 UTC as 14th comment
On article Casio: the innovator that time forgot (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

backayonder: We need a DP Challenge to take a new picture using an old digital camera.
I still have my Olympus C3030Z ? It cost $2000 in September 2000.

I have Casio QV-3000EX, Epson 3100Z, Sharp VE-CG40U, Olympus C-5050, Canon G6 to name a few.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2020 at 01:03 UTC
On article Casio: the innovator that time forgot (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

dr8: never had a Casio camera, but I have a cheap, small Casio keyboard from the mid 1980's that has an 'acoustic piano' setting that is as accurate and real as anything I've heard! Also have a $20 waterproof Casio watch from the mid 1980's that 10 years ago the seal broke and it filled with water - I laid it out in the sun to dry - it is still my daily wear watch. Keeps perfect time...

I had a cheap Casio watch once. Battery lasted for 17 years. I even dove with it to 30m deep. No problems whatsoever.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2020 at 00:54 UTC
On article Casio: the innovator that time forgot (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mark Banas: During the series of "cameras that changed my (photographic) life" I wrote up a bit on the Casio QV3000EX, my first digital camera. Then just last week, during a quarantine-cleaning out my storage bins, I found that camera! It still has the CF Microdrive in it, so now I will find some AA's to try it out... thanks, Jeff, for the reminder!

Was my first digital camera too. Bought it in 2004 on ebay for $70. It was the first 3MP digital camera, few days ahead of Canon S20.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2020 at 23:05 UTC
On article Mendel Mendlowits, founder of Adorama, has passed away (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul JM: Adorama and BH have had a profound effect on the photography marked internationally, not just in the US. 15 years ago in Australia we endured probably the highest prices of anywhere in the world to buy photographic gear locally. It was really only when Adorama and BH created a truely global market for photographic gear that a sense of true competition was created and our local outlets were forced to move into the modern era, and become competitive on price point. The other great aspect of the Adorama/BH model was the availability of rare and unusual gear that was virtually impossible to access elsewhere. When I first started underwater photography for wreck diving, the only place I could readily access specialist housings, arm, connections etc was via these outlets
They have truely democratised photography worldwide

Adorama also has diving equipment store Leisure Pro.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2020 at 18:14 UTC
In reply to:

digiart: While smartphone makers push to close the gap in image quality between smartphones and ILC cameras, traditional camera brands seem to be "sleeping at the wheel" with much less innovation.

For some years now I have been wondering when we will see a multi-lens "packet of cards size" camera. The thickness of smartphones limits optical quality too much, but a pocket size camera with a "big-ish" 1/1.28-inch sensor and a set of 4-5-6 rotating small lenses (like in the old film and TV cameras) is surely possible. Such a camera could use a small lcd on the back or just an EVF. Imagine being able to quickly switch lenses by simply rotating a small wheel. Such a camera would have image quality not too far from M4/3 but in a much smaller size.

Why not have a zoom lens instead of having multiple primes? It has been done with Canon G9X, G7X, RX100, etc.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2020 at 23:10 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

You're lying again.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 06:01 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

You're lying that Canada has the number of firearms as US per capita. Thare are way too many restriction in Canada as compared to US, even if you compare to idiotic gun hating California.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 05:06 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

Well, right now we have majority after Gorsuch and Kavanah. I think it will not be reversed in a near future, especially if Ginsburg retires soon.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 05:04 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

SteveAnderson.
You're lying! I'm Canadian too.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 04:51 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

SteveAnderson. No you don't have as many weapons in US, not even close. And in Canada it's not a right, but a privilege. Government can always confiscate your guns without question. US is 120 per 100, Canada is 35 per 100.
Also, guns don't kill, people are.
California violates 2nd amendment every day. Those unconstitutional laws must be cancelled, and politicians who adopted them must be in jail.
Please read declaration of Independence:
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 03:26 UTC
In reply to:

supeyugin1: Another California insanity. All those politicians should be in jail by now for violating the Constitution!

Enough with all your libtard BS.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2019 at 03:17 UTC
Total: 796, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »