jonas ar

But aliasing is. This can be solved by having better sensor resolution.

The 50/1.2  GM is a beautiful lens

Nope, Olympus no longer produces microscopes. It was spun out as “Evident” and recently sold

2/4 daugthers Nora at her seven years birthday morning Marie

I would prefer dimensions. It is easy to calculate area and aspect ratio if those are of interest.

But most likely sharper images, so something can be gained even if all those attributes are constant.

This is not correct. If you can shoot at the base ISO at the same DoF FF will have the advantage. No one is forcing you to restrict the exposure time to be the same if it is not required to ...

I don't think it is counter intuitive. It is called photography after all, so it should be straight forward and intuitively understandable that the amount of recorded photons is important and then ...

exactly right! Systems perform equivalently when they use optics which have the same AoV and aperture (as opposed to f-number) and use the same shutter speed. That is, they will suffer from the ...

Most lenses have adjustable apertures. That can be used to control DoF. Pretty basic stuff. What prevents you from setting the aperture to get the same DoF on a full frame system?

Yes indeed! One could have applied Hitchens’s razor to this discussion, but kudos to Jim Kasson for doing the foundational work.

The effect of diffraction is identical at the same DoF across formats

Yes, but 99.9% or more lenses have adjustable apertures and it can be set to be the same as whatever it is on the smaller format which will give the same DoF.
Remember I was replying to this...

There is no such thing as “full frame DoF”.

It does not as explained in the review and further demonstrated by Jim Kasson here: https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/noise-reduction-with-nonlinear-tools-and-downsampling/ ahh, I thought you ...

you will get more details which can be traded nope, at least not the review on this very site

Nope, a high res sensor provides more detail also at high ISOs. This can be traded for noise reduction which is far superior to the averaging resulting from larger pixels Source for this claim?

based on what?

Why? I like to shoot at ISO640, what would you recommend? 😉