clicstudio

Joined on Sep 7, 2008

Comments

Total: 217, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Capturing the unseen: Sam Forencich's Invisible Oregon (46 comments in total)

Brilliant beyond words. I also love the soundscape. Perfectly timed and executed! Amazing!

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2017 at 18:12 UTC as 11th comment
On article Stunning time-lapse captures the seasons of Norway (65 comments in total)

Most impressive! A masterpiece, really.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2017 at 15:56 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Scales USA: I've been thinking of a new phone this year, but I'm patient and will see what others offer. I have a Iphone 6+ currently, but am open to any brand. I think that Samsung will have a tough time selling a S8, too many people think the S7 exploded (It was the Galaxy Note 7) so there is the confusion factor that will make for slow sales.

I only receive Verizon out in my rural area, so a Pixel with ATT is out.

Chippy. Who cares if it exploded or caught fire? Still a threat to a person, pet or any kind of craft. First time in history that airlines ban a device from flying.
Lots of people lost faith in Samsung. Nobody with an S8 is going to be 100% confident it won't blow up on their face. Unless it's an Audi S8! 😜

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2017 at 14:04 UTC
In reply to:

clicstudio: Like we need to see more guns or depictions of guns in the world. With all the killings and terrorist attacks, this is the last thing I want to see...

stevo23 this is a photography website. What the hell are u doing here if you think cameras are anti-freedom? >:(

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 16:58 UTC
In reply to:

clicstudio: Like we need to see more guns or depictions of guns in the world. With all the killings and terrorist attacks, this is the last thing I want to see...

Stevo23 cameras have a certain resemblance to guns and they "shoot" too.
The purpose is completely different. Cameras are meant to create, guns to destroy.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 15:07 UTC
In reply to:

clicstudio: Like we need to see more guns or depictions of guns in the world. With all the killings and terrorist attacks, this is the last thing I want to see...

Make America dangerous again... People like you and Mr. T who want to shoot and blow stuff up are the problem. Less guns on the hands of stupid people=less killing. Simple. That comment that says people shoot people, not guns, is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
The only shooting I care about is shooting pictures.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 15:05 UTC

Like we need to see more guns or depictions of guns in the world. With all the killings and terrorist attacks, this is the last thing I want to see...

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2017 at 14:30 UTC as 17th comment | 9 replies

50 years ago, Speed Racer's Mach 5 already had a homing robot by pressing the G button on the steering wheel. It could be controlled with a joystick by Speed. :)

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2017 at 15:56 UTC as 7th comment

I am an iPhone fan and love my 7 Plus but this thing just blows the iPhone out of the water... I wish Apple was friends with Google and borrowed the technology for the next iPhone... I am glad the OS is still horrible. This is a great camera on a phone I would never buy. That's why I still own a Canon Powershot 720HS. No phone beats a point and shoot.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2016 at 17:11 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

WizardOfOss: I'm pretty worried about 10.5, more specifically this part: "It's safe to assume that there are a lot of people talking about the words 'Bokeh' and 'Raw' today who had never heard the terms before Apple's launch event this week."

History learns us that within a few days that same lot of people will "know" that Apple invented both bokeh and raw, and will claim that every other camera manufacturer copied Apple.

WizardOfAss Apple didn't invent it but it's smart enough to introduce to the general public a new word that most people call "blurry background".
Not all smartphone users know anything about aperture or iso or anything like that. They only want the photo they take to look good. Apple does that with a simple interface but now, with RAW support, some of us Pros, will be able to tweak more details out of an image on a simple device that you carry with you everywhere. I call that progress and forward thinking.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 17:34 UTC
In reply to:

GaryJP: "It shoots 4k"

Like my TWO generations old Galaxy Note 4.

Why do u even have to show you are a loser commenting in an article about a phone that you will not buy because you are either still living in the past or can't afford a newer phone or you are afraid that you will love it and throw that old Galaxy Note 4 in the can. iPhone 6 and 6s also shot 4K and it still looks incredible today so get informed...

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 17:29 UTC
In reply to:

DingieM: Christ this is a stupid article, more like a sales talk. My respect for DPReview just dropped big time.

I really hate people that always have to drop names and compare... Shut up and read the article if it's beneficial for you or don't read it. Barney was careful enough not to compare it to other phones. This is just information and why it might be relevant to photographers. They don't even have a sample iPhone 7 to play with so the article is clear and informative. That's all.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 17:25 UTC
In reply to:

wtang: Why is there a need for an news article like this to "sell" people on the new iPhone 7? There hasn't been a similar article to try to and "sell" people on the merits of any other smartphone. Why does the iPhone 7 need and get this kind of editorial promotion/marketing? Just genuinely curious.

dude this article clearly points the advantages of the new available technology and why, us photographers, should care about it. DPR is not SELLING anything. This is a review site and they are pointing "selling points" not selling iPhones.
If u don't Like it, don't read it and move on.
People are so close minded lately. Technology is changing by the minute. iPhone 7 is going to be obsolete next year, and so is your TV, your car, your watch and we even have intelligent homes.

Apple created the tech revolution in 2007 like it or not. This is just another step towards the future and they have the balls (courage they call it) to remove a 100-year old analog headphone jack and people are complaining because they won't be abe to use their stupid $10 headphones. The future is all digital and wireless.
For photographers, this iPhone is a huge welcome and a great improvement.
I for one, can't wait to shoot with my New Jet Black 256GB iPhone 7Plus and blow people's minds with it.
Cheers, baby!

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 17:19 UTC

Horrible results in my opinion. Everything looks like a cartoon...
I like subtle HDR but this is ridiculous. Learn to expose well and get a good camera with good DR and u won't need this stuff...

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 21:31 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

clicstudio: LR is one of the worst apps I have ever worked with. I am forced to use it since Apple doesn't have support for Canon 1DX Mark II RAW files. >:(
It's slow, complicated and the interface is horrible.
I hate it with a passion...

@String. I use it cause I have no choice. I need to work with my Canon RAW files.

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2016 at 18:54 UTC

LR is one of the worst apps I have ever worked with. I am forced to use it since Apple doesn't have support for Canon 1DX Mark II RAW files. >:(
It's slow, complicated and the interface is horrible.
I hate it with a passion...

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 13:27 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

studiopwp: Errm this feature has been there for a long time now, ever since Content Aware Fill made its debut. You do your crop/rotate/straighten, select the transparent areas, feather 5-6 pixels and hit Content Aware Fill. BTW Content Aware Fill works far better on a flattened layer.

it only works on the background. not on a layer.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 18:11 UTC

I must say the content aware tool in PS CC is very good. It works better than expected most of the time and saves a lot of time or at least it helps with removing unwanted parts of an image. Even complex tattoos or imperfections from skin and such.
I wish it worked on a layer though.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 18:10 UTC as 5th comment

Funny, Snap Seed for iPhone had it for a couple of years now...

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 18:08 UTC as 6th comment
On article Swirly bokeh: Lensbaby announces Twist 60 lens (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

clicstudio: I don't understand who would buy such a lens and produce an effect that can't be removed. Basically if u don't want it, you are stuck with it.. In photoshop you can do the same and have control over the effect.
All of the lens baby line is the same. Photoshop can emulate all of their effects with a lot more precision and control.

Roland I meant u can use a regular fast lens that does bikes and then apply spiral effect in photoshop. Still, there are a lot of plug-ins that emulate focus and bokeh. Here is one. https://www.topazlabs.com/lenseffects

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 03:29 UTC
Total: 217, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »