Lives in Latvia Riga, Latvia
Works as a IT Specialist
Has a website at
Joined on Oct 17, 2011


Total: 32, showing: 21 – 32
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? (1507 comments in total)

It would be 6D, but probably in next year's poll :)

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 07:58 UTC as 536th comment

Half of all comments with unnecessary flame :(
There will always be people who need such lenses, becase they won't be changing them during theyr travels or events.
The quality such a lens + low to mid ragnge body provides, is totally ok for purposes, they will be using the pictures later, and there's no need to tell them something else.

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2012 at 09:19 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS 6D sample images added to hands-on preview (252 comments in total)

The High ISO pictures (6400; 12800) look just great compared even to one generation older Canon's.
This will be a great step-up to FF and nice step-up to camera Max. Auto ISO setting.

Still crossing my fingers for retail price in banana republic where i'm living ;)

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 08:33 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

audijam: i want this lens...i want all Sigma lens could be calibrated by using the USB dock so we could do it at home.

All new ones will be. Sigma will remake or renew all it's lineup in some time, and new lenses will get this new looks, new categorization and USB port.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2012 at 15:10 UTC
In reply to:

bricci_mn: Sorry, but what's the big issue in the conversion from US$ 899 to UK£ 799???
also by adding a big 25% of taxes it would not cost much more than UK£ 705 or EUR 885 in the worst case...
Why the hell are still there those differences??? :(

In real life there's never such a difference

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2012 at 15:07 UTC
In reply to:

Andrew Elliott: I simply don't understand why, in this day and age, with a prime lens and all their technology and knowledge of implementation already there at hand, at the price they're charging, they couldn't have made that 35/2 more complete and made it weather-sealed. It's not even a zoom so I imagine it would be easier to achieve.

At the price, even after it falls a bit, I think it's pretty mean and tight-fisted of Canon.

Easy - weather sealed lens with such price would bring to Canon much less $$. So there is no WS :)

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 07:20 UTC
In reply to:

The A-Team: I like the current Canon lens caps in contrast to the other brands...

Only to jump out of the crowd?
I personally don't like the sex with getting the cap out of (or on) the lens with lens hood attached, so this is really the best part of these news.

Different story is with this new 24-70/F4.
Price is... ehmm... wtf?
And din't Canon listen at all to people saying that zoom ring on 24-105 is a bit too close to lens mount and camera? This one has identical design :(
They better could make a 24-70/F2.8 IS then this one, which due to IS availability will compete with it's faster non-IS sister.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 11:41 UTC

I really doubt but in the same time hope, that they will add the same featuure to upcomming 6D, as it has by Canon words nice feature to autoficus in as low light levels as -3 EV.
I just wish to use my TC with autofocus and without spending several T$ on a 1DX ;)

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2012 at 09:20 UTC as 11th comment
On article HDR for the Rest of Us (196 comments in total)
In reply to:

dark goob: Just think, if you had an external HDMI monitor you wouldn't have to bend to the ground. Or a camera with a rotating screen.

Why doesn't Canon put a damn rotating screen on the Mark III? I would buy one if it had it.

Totally agree!
I see the non-existent swivel screen as the biggest disadvantage for upgrade to 5DIII after using 60D for some time..

It helps a lot!

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2012 at 07:36 UTC
In reply to:

Mach Schnell: Holy cow! Are they serious? $1,700. That is 3 times what I paid for the extremely good Sigma 150mm f/2.8. I can't fathom why it would cost so much more. I don't think they'll get many takers at that price.

Easy to understand the price tag, if you have the line - "First in the world" in advertisment ;)
It's happening so not only with lens manufacturing, but everywhere else too.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2012 at 14:46 UTC
In reply to:

Greg VdB: I really like my Sigma 17-70 for the high-quality materials used, and I never actually noticed any 'barrel expansion and contraction' in extreme temperatures in any of my lenses, so I'm kinda sceptic about this TSC. I just hope that all this isn't a cheap marketing tactic by Sigma to introduce lenses with a lower quality finish (lighter and smaller??). There's already enough wobbly plasticky Nikon and Canon lenses out there in the entry level segment!

Totaly agree about 17-70. Great bang for the buck.

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2012 at 14:16 UTC
On article Sigma USA announces pricing of 50-150mm F2.8 OS HSM (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: if youve got an 18-50/2.8 it makes more sense to get the 70-200/2.8.. the 50-70mm difference is nothing and can be made up by walking. the extra 225-300 on the tele end is far for useful.

A ton of comments, but nobody is mentioning, that 70-200 is a FF lens. If you put it on Crop body, it becomes more like 110-320 if field of view is compared.
So there can't be a conversation about 20 or 30 mm but at least 60, which is a huge thing!!

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2012 at 08:41 UTC
Total: 32, showing: 21 – 32
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »