arbux

Yes, in terms of price, because G85 is way more capable camera.

I see. Makes perfect sense. Is it responsive, no drag? I recall strong opposition on this forum against fully articulated screen (no idea why), so I didn't think pen-f has it.

It depends on the objective. They gained a lot of market share in no time especially in the markets where olympus was strong. Now, as you noticed above, market share allows you to lower price ...

I doubt it. M43 sold a lot over lat 10 years, compared to new ef-m when that ultrawide was released. Basically 9-18 paid off its development costs some time ago. NX12-24 is better optically than ...

It probably very similar to make such lens, just more difficult to design. However how much more difficult is unknown.

For that you need sony a7rii or iii, nikon d850 or canon 5ds(r)

Misunderstanding or not, thsis is happening: https://nikonrumors.com/2018/11/07/the-latest-full-frame-market-mirrorless-market-share-sony-67-canon-22-1-nikon-10-4.aspx/ see the second chart.

Just above my question. Either you use EVF or you use touch focus. Unless you don;t move focus when looking though EVF, then it would be very poor example of usability, way more important than ...

Maybe it can. Maybe it wouldn't;t sell enough volume to make it worthwhile.

I actually don't understand what they thinking. They definitely have marketing team and they see what competitors do. Even now they could sell E-M5 III easily in good volumes with just 2 ...

Canon APS-C: 10-18mm (i.e. wider than 9-18 and better optically and with IS) US$269.00 Canon mirrorless: 11-22 (i.e. wider than 9-18 and better optically and with IS): US$349.00 Nikon: 10-20mm ...

reading hurts? " We've started with these three as they're the most sought-after, and we hope to expand it to other systems soon."

Fuji flagship is X-H1. Check prices.

Eventually. It's already late. The real question is if this will be ahead of competition (think x-t3) as it will be released later, or just ahead of e-m5 ii.

You don't use EVF then? WHat is the usability of camera without evf?

Other companies add innovations to lover end models, so R&D spend on top end model benefits entire lineup. Not Olympus. It keeps modern sensors (that are old anyway) to top models, better AF to top ...

If you go m43 I'd recommend G9 way. It beats E-M5 II in every aspects. At this stage e-m5 ii is camera with 2012 sensor, lacking AF, poor movie capabilities, way inferior viewfinder etc. Alternativ ...

You're saying m43 lenses are much smaller than FF. In fact they're not smaller and sometimes larger (e.g. nikkon 300mm f4 vs olympus 300mm f4 - Olympus weights twice as much).

Having Nikkor 200mm f2 I'm pretty sure this will not happen and for a good reason. However Olympus doesn't offer anything with f2.8 above 150mm so it has plenty of room for improvement without ...

Not really. 1. Olympus pro zooms are commonly citicized for its poor bokeh with busy backgound what is an issue for both sports and nature photographers (foliage). 2. Olympus pro zooms end at 300mm ...