arbux

on your screen maybe?

exactly, so that no one see this

@Magnar W - I fogot your reading skill is extremly selective, few words out of a sentence is maximum you can do. I wrote "anything comparable to canon rf 50mm" - and you say that there are 0.95...

It looks like dpreview photographers would had me to pay to watch their pictures. FAIR USE snowflakes!

This is not a precedent, as this way of ruling is well established.

Ye,s no difference, please move to China, it's still cheaper there.

Learn English. Then read about previous precedents. There is no dilemma, this is established ruling across many years,

@Magner W - come back when sony has anything comparable to canon rf 50mm 1.2 or 28-70 f2. Your personal assesment of what is possible in e -mount is of no relevance to anyone but yourself.

SIgma has much better bokeh and much bigger bokeh balls.

Better?

Equivalent to m43 2.8 zoom, except price and range.

It is not and lensrentals test shows it.

Which means it is new, unless that firmware is very old.

And how that's better?

"Credible"  - what's credible here? Do you know any certified organization that makes "credible" reports in that area? ANy "credible" reports on sony Zeiss 35mm 1.4 variance? Let's see DXO results ...

If humans were not sensible we wouldn't even climb trees, not to mention leave them.

@entoman - you don;t know if slowly.

@Richard Bulter - maybe it would be more complex, but the question should be "would it sell" and not "would it be more complex". This is laughable complexity compared to other consumer products...

Reading is hard for some. Adapter is not telling you that lens needs fw upgrade. Yes, stick to you slr.

Is that the version for APS-C?
I see people buying one and cutting into 4 pieces to m43.