gary0319

I had not considered the single frame possibility, thanks.

It really continues to amaze me. There is even some tech wizardry going on that mitigates some subject movement. The candid street image below was HHHR with the E-M1 III. What surprised me was ...

OK, today you can learn something… for free. If you will indulge me. The E-M1 III Hand Held Hi Rez image is actually a compilation of 16 individual images that are stacked in-camera resulting in a ...

Because that’s the name of the camera setting and differentiates it from Tripod Hi Rez. Here’s one from the E-M1 III with shutter speed of 1/4 which, if you understand how the HHHR works, equates ...

I rarely use the HHHR of my OM-5 for landscape. However for B&W images, the HHHR 25 mpx JPEGS rival what I was getting from my Pen F Mono2 images. Also, the HHHR in-camera stacking does great, ...

@John isaacs. I hand hold for everything.....my tripod has not been out of the closet since last July 4 for the fireworks. I often use the focus stacking for orchid sprays at botanical gardens...

Me and my wife have used our PL100-400's for everything from Bifs to bugs to rodeo broncs to surfers with great success. Good Luck!

When I made the move from Canon to MFT I just sold off my Canon lenses to fund additional Olympus/Panasonic lenses. I can see keeping the Canon lenses if the MFT kit is a supplemental add on to ...

Well, as much as I’d like the camera to do all the focus bracket figuring it would be, IMO, a major programming and technical challenge. Just image getting the details all sorted to take into...

Right off the bat, I prefer the image from the 100-400 with the cleaner small feather details. But, it seems like the Panny image suffers from some over sharpening of the feathers, so that might ...

Thanks for the info., I look forward to hearing the results of your comparisons.

Since you have both the Olympus 60 Macro and the Canon 100 macro I would be curious to know if the detail resolution is equal between the two. I have been under the, perhaps mistaken assumption ...

I think there are two types of decision making people… those that ferret out the 20% of critical factors in any decision and go from there, and those that need to resolve every little nit before ...

I never had the 300 f/4, did have the 40-150 f/2.8 and the PL100-400 at the same time. Ultimately the PL100-400 won out because it was sharper once any teleconverter was added to  increase the ...

Why? It seems the “easy return” business model is working pretty well for Amazon and B&H, and Adorama, and, and … Now if you have some kind of moral dilemma with it, that’s another issue

We've all tripped over this awful issue once............. but only once. The usual suspects always come out for an Equivalence battle reenactment.

Welcome to the 21st Century. Online shopping is geared towards liberal return policies.... built right into the price. Heck Amazon encourages such behavior with "Try before you Buy", and the ...

Yet, two differing end results causes some confusion. I have a friend who references every image he takes in terms of print size, be it 12/16 or 8/10, etc. because this is what was important to ...

Indirectly, perhaps. But a case in point. Since we know that the DOF doubles with the m43 sensor compared to a FF for a given f stop, I can shoot a flower at f/8 whereas my FF friend needs f/16 ...

So what? Is my M43 image 4 times less bright to the viewer. If not, then this is nothing more than an academic exercise, with absolutely no bearing on the end result, if both images are properly ...