Joined on Oct 4, 2018


Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
In reply to:

bobn2: And then there's the 24MP FF BSI IMX410, ten to the dozen the 'Nikon designed' sensor to be found in the upcoming Z6. And, BTW IMX571 is not a 'nickname', it is the official Sony part number. The list is not really Sony 'sharing details' of some of its sensors, this is it's catalogue, meaning that if you want to design a camera, you can go and buy these parts off-the-shelf from Sony. There are also non-catalogue parts such as the IMX309 in the D850 and Z7 - presumably not available in the catalog since Nikon paid for exclusivity for at least a period.

Which one would be used for the Sony 7R FF variants?

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 12:20 UTC
In reply to:

32BT: No mention of the current 50mpx MF offerings?

And how about the 47mpx FF?

The sensel pitch for the 24mpx vs 100mpx seems quite interesting, btw.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 12:15 UTC

No mention of the current 50mpx MF offerings?

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2018 at 09:09 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies
On article Nikon Z7 Review (4505 comments in total)
In reply to:

calson: It was never stated what software was used to do the NEF conversion. I have had problems with banding with NEF image files processed with Adobe's reverse engineered RAW converter and no issues when I then processed the same image files using Nikon's Capture program.

Adobe ACR is quick but it is the worst NEF converter available. I use it for batch processing to produce JPG files for clients to review but not for processing a file that will be made into a print or go into an album.

Since it's a regular pattern with known cause, shouldn't it be considered *more* dynamic range as opposed to less?

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2018 at 10:06 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4