Lives in Spain Spain
Joined on Mar 3, 2010


Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13

Camera aside. I really enjoyed the fantastic sample gallery @ Dan Bracaglia. Stunning photos Sir!

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 07:52 UTC as 302nd comment

This is a good thing. I can literally look the other way! :)

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2017 at 00:50 UTC as 85th comment

I've been using a very similar wrist strap for about 5 years now. £1.99 and Free postage. The leather is nice and soft. Many sellers have them on ebay, for example:


Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 14:23 UTC as 68th comment | 3 replies
On article Art Wolfe: Swimming with the Humpbacks, Tonga, 2013 (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

lemonadedrinker: What is all the nonsense with the name across the image? Who cares who took them; they're beautiful pictures ruined with the distraction of the name thing at the bottom-saying to all of us Look at me,I'm as important as the whale.
Eugene Smith never put his name on a picture. Nor did Edward Steichen. Nor any other genius of the arcane art of photography.

If you look closely at the first photo, the whale is looking straight at the watermark. Art Wolfe holds a selfie stick with his name in front of the camera, therefore mesmerising and informing every living thing of his importance. True story. ;-)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2015 at 23:03 UTC
In reply to:

James C. Murray: Good photos but some prop blur would lend some idea of motion to the Herc and the smaller prop aircraft.

Just when you think it is safe to read, thinking there could not possibly be any reason for a negative/stupid comment......

Silly photographer! Even though flying themselve's, they should have put an ND filter on for blurring the props. Instead we see airplanes that clearly aren't in motion, but yet managing to achieve flight. Quite an extraordinary feat! ;)

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2015 at 22:20 UTC
On article Behind the Shot: Dali's Dream (103 comments in total)

Thanks for sharing this technique. It is a fantastic shot and a great title. If Dali were alive, I'm sure he would want to buy a print.

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2014 at 11:07 UTC as 30th comment
On article Enthusiast compact camera roundup (185 comments in total)

This is for compact cameras? I have the Fuji X100s and it slips right into my....... camera bag, because it is not a compact camera! It's a bloody good camera, but calling it compact is like calling a toilet roll a tampon.

I hope it is not just me. Maybe, you're all now used to hipster jeans that hang below your ass and pockets big enough for a keg of beer?

So, back to COMPACT cameras. Ricoh GR, Nikon Coolpix A, Sony RX, Canon G7... and Sigma DPM/Q (Although slightly bigger and less user friendly). Bigger sensors that fit in 'normal pockets'.

I think your top 4 cameras are 'Enthusiast small camera bag cameras' and marketed like that, all a good choice.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2014 at 01:35 UTC as 61st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Prairie Pal: yawn

@ Prairie Pal. I just looked at your gallery. The shots you have of dust on your sensor are sensational. I can see why you find Benjamin Von Wong's photos so boring.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 12:33 UTC
On article Leica announces X Vario zoom compact with APS-C sensor (757 comments in total)

Wow! This release sounds as popular as another brand, albeit a software one. Maybe it should be called the Leica CC. :)

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 16:06 UTC as 255th comment

If you add a 6th option. 'I would rather pay a one off fee to own the software I pay for' I would tick that.

Another thing. If Adobe really want to charge people for new features, why not add the option to allow us to pay for future ACR updates? I'm perfectly happy with everything in Photoshop CS6, so for me ACR is the only thing I would want to pay for. I don't want or need any anti blur features, or radial filters. I would rather know whatever camera I own in the future is supported.

The stupid thing is that for the price of Adobe Photoshop CC for 1 year I could actually buy an F1.4 lens, which would negate the need for the radial blur features anyway.

I could go on, but for me PS CS6 is all anyone really needs. Maybe a developer will bring out a plugin which works like ACR and therefore CS6 becomes the final version of Photoshop for everyone.

I really hope you listen to your users and change your mind on this.

This is another customer who will be opting out.

'Sad Face'

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 20:39 UTC as 841st comment | 3 replies

Sorry, I think you got the title wrong. Was it meant to be:

PDN publishes 2013 list of 30 emerging photographers not to watch?

I agree with Clint with 500px & everyone else really. For me Ming Thein was a huge inspiration in 2012, and I Imagine will be for 2013 too. I don't have 29 other names, but do follow quite a few other photographers, some of which post here regularly.

p.s. Wow, I just made my first negative post on the comments section. I'm one of those now.....No!...Sorry, it won't happen again! :/

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2013 at 21:51 UTC as 34th comment
On article Mobile-friendly forums launched (102 comments in total)

Thanks DPR Team!

The forum looks great on my Asus Transformer. Really easy to use and navigate.

Much appreciated.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2013 at 11:30 UTC as 37th comment
On photo Penticton Pier in the Out Of The Darkness challenge (2 comments in total)

Hi Steve. Thanks for your comment. It was taken in Canada. Nearly 2 Years ago now. A friend of mine lives there, so I had the opportunity for a nice summer road trip. Maybe it's time for another visit. :)

Link | Posted on May 20, 2010 at 11:03 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 13, showing: 1 – 13