|
nevada5
Lives in
The Southwest, United States
Works as a
Future lottery winner.
Joined on
Jul 22, 2001
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |  |
| Rice fields of Bali by N4865G from Rural photography | Red Bellied Woodpecker by Freddy Mercurio from A Big Year - Birds 2022 | Setting Moon by Jonathan Shapiro from My Best Photo of the Fortnight | MV Dayspring shipwrecked in Scottish Highlands by summicron from Wrecked | PB_CrabShack_17x11 by PattiTB from Crabs Unlimited |
So..... Why not buy a gold bar?
I guess the first 14 images constitutes one entry? I spent time trying to view each one till I figured out it's a collage of less than mediocre images. So I got tired. I came back after a nap and looked and I like 2, 5 and 7.
On the intro page under key specs it shows "Three-axis tilting touchscreen" yet on the conclusion page it says (correctly) "Dual-hinged screen."
Shouldn't we wait one more year till the end of the second decade of the century? The century began January 1, 2001. So .... it's math.
Amazing. 2 people have already had it. Zero people own it, so I guess those 2 that had it found a reason to sell it. That's too bad.
nevada5: It seems that when you include compact cameras, the lens quality should be taken into consideration. A camera that typically has a junk lens is not a bargain at any price.
Compact camera, as in - fixed lens.
Applejack8: youll never ever see me buy a gx85 the hardest camera menu to decipher ever!!!!!
Good to get that out, huh?
Wait - how do you know that?
It seems that when you include compact cameras, the lens quality should be taken into consideration. A camera that typically has a junk lens is not a bargain at any price.
Just pre-ordered one.
nevada5: Seriously? The A1000 has a downward-tilting LCD screen. So ---- waist-level shooting is done by holding the camera upside-down, or maybe standing on your head. What a fantastic design!!! (That was sarcasm) How stupid.
Huh. Maybe not. Confusing wording?
Seriously? The A1000 has a downward-tilting LCD screen. So ---- waist-level shooting is done by holding the camera upside-down, or maybe standing on your head. What a fantastic design!!! (That was sarcasm) How stupid.
Yeah, stupid has no bounds. And you still can't fix it.
Sirandar: My OMD EM5 took a 200m bounce down a mountain scree slope in a Pelican care. I put it down to change footing and while I was looking the other way down it went. I was bouncing a meter in the air as it went down much to my horror.
I made the long climb down to recover the SD card, but surprisingly when I finally got to it neither of the closures had popped. When I opened it up I found the camera intact and after testing everything except the clip on flash was working. I ripped the flash apart later and the flash had a unfortunate design issue in the switch.
I still use that camera .... it suffered no ill effect I can detect.
This is perhaps on of the advantages of m4/3 ..... all my lenses and the camera fits into it..... and I can take it up a mountain to something stupid like dropping it down.
So, you win?
Please enlighten me. Micro Four Thirds is a lens mount. The sensor is Four Thirds. Or, has something changed?
Titled: Primitive snapshot.
I’m not saying let’s go kill all the stupid people… I’m just saying let’s remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
Wish I knew who to credit for that.
(unknown member): Just shows what you can do with a potato and a lot of weed :)
I've done more with less weed. I think. Maybe I'm thinkin of someone else.
Tried to make a doll house out of Cheetos once but - ah, it was fun. I think.
WHOA. Nailed it!
Fog Maker: Fake or real... None of them is proper representation of how we actually see the world
Per your linked definition: the blurred quality or effect seen in the out-of-focus portion of a photograph...
Bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus area. You can have nice bokeh, smooth bokeh, jittery bokeh, etc. But you can't have a lot of bokeh, you can't have a photo with bokeh - that makes no sense.
Fog Maker: Fake or real... None of them is proper representation of how we actually see the world
It's not bokeh. An out-of-focus area of an image is not bokeh.