nevada5

nevada5

Lives in United States The Southwest, United States
Works as a Future lottery winner.
Joined on Jul 22, 2001

Comments

Total: 59, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

So..... Why not buy a gold bar?

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2022 at 17:11 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply

I guess the first 14 images constitutes one entry? I spent time trying to view each one till I figured out it's a collage of less than mediocre images. So I got tired. I came back after a nap and looked and I like 2, 5 and 7.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2022 at 23:02 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm X-T3 Review (2480 comments in total)

On the intro page under key specs it shows "Three-axis tilting touchscreen" yet on the conclusion page it says (correctly) "Dual-hinged screen."

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2019 at 03:36 UTC as 42nd comment

Shouldn't we wait one more year till the end of the second decade of the century? The century began January 1, 2001. So .... it's math.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2019 at 05:40 UTC as 53rd comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon developing D6 professional DSLR (1002 comments in total)

Amazing. 2 people have already had it. Zero people own it, so I guess those 2 that had it found a reason to sell it. That's too bad.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2019 at 18:20 UTC as 87th comment | 1 reply
On article The best camera bargains of 2021 (348 comments in total)
In reply to:

nevada5: It seems that when you include compact cameras, the lens quality should be taken into consideration. A camera that typically has a junk lens is not a bargain at any price.

Compact camera, as in - fixed lens.

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2019 at 19:43 UTC
On article The best camera bargains of 2021 (348 comments in total)
In reply to:

Applejack8: youll never ever see me buy a gx85 the hardest camera menu to decipher ever!!!!!

Good to get that out, huh?
Wait - how do you know that?

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2019 at 18:04 UTC
On article The best camera bargains of 2021 (348 comments in total)

It seems that when you include compact cameras, the lens quality should be taken into consideration. A camera that typically has a junk lens is not a bargain at any price.

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2019 at 18:02 UTC as 40th comment | 4 replies
On article Minolta DiMAGE V hands-on review (287 comments in total)

Just pre-ordered one.

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2019 at 04:49 UTC as 49th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

nevada5: Seriously? The A1000 has a downward-tilting LCD screen. So ---- waist-level shooting is done by holding the camera upside-down, or maybe standing on your head. What a fantastic design!!! (That was sarcasm) How stupid.

Huh. Maybe not. Confusing wording?

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2019 at 03:34 UTC

Seriously? The A1000 has a downward-tilting LCD screen. So ---- waist-level shooting is done by holding the camera upside-down, or maybe standing on your head. What a fantastic design!!! (That was sarcasm) How stupid.

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2019 at 02:11 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply

Yeah, stupid has no bounds. And you still can't fix it.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2019 at 02:35 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Sirandar: My OMD EM5 took a 200m bounce down a mountain scree slope in a Pelican care. I put it down to change footing and while I was looking the other way down it went. I was bouncing a meter in the air as it went down much to my horror.

I made the long climb down to recover the SD card, but surprisingly when I finally got to it neither of the closures had popped. When I opened it up I found the camera intact and after testing everything except the clip on flash was working. I ripped the flash apart later and the flash had a unfortunate design issue in the switch.

I still use that camera .... it suffered no ill effect I can detect.

This is perhaps on of the advantages of m4/3 ..... all my lenses and the camera fits into it..... and I can take it up a mountain to something stupid like dropping it down.

So, you win?

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2019 at 16:39 UTC

Please enlighten me. Micro Four Thirds is a lens mount. The sensor is Four Thirds. Or, has something changed?

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2019 at 03:00 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On photo DSCN1086 in nevada5's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Titled: Primitive snapshot.

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2018 at 02:18 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply

I’m not saying let’s go kill all the stupid people… I’m just saying let’s remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

Wish I knew who to credit for that.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2018 at 05:48 UTC as 43rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

(unknown member): Just shows what you can do with a potato and a lot of weed :)

I've done more with less weed. I think. Maybe I'm thinkin of someone else.

Tried to make a doll house out of Cheetos once but - ah, it was fun. I think.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2018 at 02:54 UTC
On photo D4B_9678SFGiantsBravesBrokenBatCrop169PP@ in RBFresno's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

WHOA. Nailed it!

Link | Posted on May 29, 2018 at 02:11 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Fog Maker: Fake or real... None of them is proper representation of how we actually see the world

Per your linked definition: the blurred quality or effect seen in the out-of-focus portion of a photograph...

Bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus area. You can have nice bokeh, smooth bokeh, jittery bokeh, etc. But you can't have a lot of bokeh, you can't have a photo with bokeh - that makes no sense.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2018 at 17:42 UTC
In reply to:

Fog Maker: Fake or real... None of them is proper representation of how we actually see the world

It's not bokeh. An out-of-focus area of an image is not bokeh.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2018 at 00:52 UTC
Total: 59, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »