dpfan32

dpfan32

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Nov 3, 2010

Comments

Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS M6 Review (343 comments in total)
In reply to:

TORN: There must be something wrong with Sony because so many of those users come over to see a camera which is actually pleasant and efficient to use and comes along with good and affordable lenses plus it makes your existing Canon setup even more useful. Just add an ultra wide or the 22 or the EF adapter to your setup and suddenly the Canon is not a bad deal at all. Sure, it could be a bit cheaper but it will be in time.

Yeas cameras these days going more and more expensive. Look at the Panasonic G70 and G85 ant the price difference. You already mentioned the A6xxx series but the RX100 series as well, they going completely mad with prices :(

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 08:43 UTC
On article Travel tripods: Comparing 5 aluminum kits (111 comments in total)

I had the BeFree for a few weeks. This thing is only for small mirror less cameras. A 50D mounted with a heavy lens and the tripod swings with every touch for a few seconds. This is ridiculous for such a brand product.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2017 at 19:21 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

Fred Briggs: "We are so small between the stars, so large against the sky." c1967 - Leonard Cohen

All fake. This makes all people feel small. we are all special.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 19:41 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

fyngyrz: Honestly, if you're going to try to show what a camera body can do, shoot with good primes. If you shlock up what reaches the sensor with a compromise lens, you're giving entirely the wrong impression.

Aaahh some people don't understand me and go completely insane...

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2017 at 17:30 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

fyngyrz: Honestly, if you're going to try to show what a camera body can do, shoot with good primes. If you shlock up what reaches the sensor with a compromise lens, you're giving entirely the wrong impression.

Zoom range is too small. Flat images when everything is in focus

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2017 at 21:07 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

fyngyrz: Honestly, if you're going to try to show what a camera body can do, shoot with good primes. If you shlock up what reaches the sensor with a compromise lens, you're giving entirely the wrong impression.

I never got used to the standard zoom kit lenses. I had the Canon EF-S 18-55 IS II (sold it) than the STM version (sold it again)... I preferred to make photos with my RX100. Photos turned a bit better in terms of sharpness.
Now I have the EOS M with the EF-M 18-55 IS STM and the lens stays only in my camera bag. If I wanted flat images my iPhone 6S is just in my pants pocket. :)

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 14:08 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 sample gallery (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

dpfan32: I have the EOS M
You already may know what I'm gonna say ... :)

I don't see this one is any better in terms of OOC JPEG.
I have similar blossoms photos made with the original M.
I cannot justify the high body price of 799 € to replace my original M.

Yes there are tons and tons of other features and improvements. I know.
I could consider replacing my DSLR with one of the ne M5 or M6, but htis is another story.
But using it like I'm using the original M I own like only walking around and making here and there a photo of a blossom for example, the new M6 would mean only waste of money.
For birding I take my DSLR anyway.

So where is the 2017 improvements over 2012. It should be a dramatic improvement but it's not. IMHO !!!

my EF-M 18-55 stays at home. I use the excellent EF-M 22mm and it is sooo small ad cute.
But the EOS-M 18-55 is actually not that bad. It's much better at 18mm than the EF-S 18-55 STM for DSLRs (which is on the other side better at 55mm, but for that I would use the 55-250 STM anyway).
I'm very happy with the EOS M and sold my RX100 MK I; I hated the Sony colors.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 09:15 UTC

better image quality than some newer non-Sony-1-incher ... :)

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 15:28 UTC as 6th comment
On article Canon EOS M6 sample gallery (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: Not a good gallery, looks like random snapshots demonstrating nothing.

iPhone quality :)

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 13:34 UTC
On article Canon EOS M6 sample gallery (114 comments in total)

I have the EOS M
You already may know what I'm gonna say ... :)

I don't see this one is any better in terms of OOC JPEG.
I have similar blossoms photos made with the original M.
I cannot justify the high body price of 799 € to replace my original M.

Yes there are tons and tons of other features and improvements. I know.
I could consider replacing my DSLR with one of the ne M5 or M6, but htis is another story.
But using it like I'm using the original M I own like only walking around and making here and there a photo of a blossom for example, the new M6 would mean only waste of money.
For birding I take my DSLR anyway.

So where is the 2017 improvements over 2012. It should be a dramatic improvement but it's not. IMHO !!!

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 13:32 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

thx1138: What on earth is the 9000D?

is it a XXD or in the end a XXXXD model? It's confusing.
We can make a compromise: it's a XXXD model in the end

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 09:53 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

davids8560: My PowerShot S95 still works just fine. What time is it? It's cold in here. What's your name again?

yes the S95 was an amazing camera. The newer G7X is not much better at daylight.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 09:53 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

fyngyrz: Honestly, if you're going to try to show what a camera body can do, shoot with good primes. If you shlock up what reaches the sensor with a compromise lens, you're giving entirely the wrong impression.

Yes the average consumer would not buy much lenses and probably shoot most of the time with the kit lens.
But why the heck the average consumer will pay 1000 EUR ?? He could continue making photos with his iPhone which he has already and get similar results.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 09:49 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)
In reply to:

Akpinxit: OOC JPGs look exactly the same as any Canons' DSLR from last decade (only inflated to 24 MP) . The lens is too - nothing much , with some images it is hard to determine where focus plane is . Well , kit lens ... . I wonder if it has MA .

...exactly my thoughts.
I came to a conclusion that the Canon 70D and the 7D Mark II have the best picture quality of all Canon APS-C cameras.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 09:47 UTC
On article Canon EOS 77D / 9000D sample gallery (147 comments in total)

why I am not impressed a little... I had the 1100D and JPEG wise nothing seems to have changed...

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2017 at 09:46 UTC as 5th comment

What will the new 100-400 cost??

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2017 at 20:54 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies

Advertising stickers + hight price = no-go

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2017 at 06:35 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

davev8: i have just noticed there is no joystick on the 80D!!! what model did they drop that at???

I have the 50D.
It's a beast and only has marginally if any worse image quality than my 100D which has the newest variant of the 18MP sensor.
It will be hard to switch to the 77D ...
The 80D is too expensive for me...

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2017 at 20:03 UTC
In reply to:

bryanbrun: Admittedly, I know very little about Canon cameras. Are these the best products they have?

There's no electronic shutter, no 4K video and the FPS for all these models seems quite low.

Why do people buy these cameras?

I bought 2 years ago a A5100 (same sensor as the A6000) as an replacement for my RX100. I returned it. Even the photos from my EOS 1100D were overall better to my eyes :P

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2017 at 19:59 UTC

That's what Saturn really looks like :) Very nice photo!
"picture editor from NASA" says it all ;) All NASA pictures are pure CGI.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2017 at 12:07 UTC as 3rd comment | 9 replies
Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »