ChristianC1975

I guess in this set-up the talent is always facing the camera.
In any case, poor wireless performance for both.
My Rode Wireless (I) died and looking for replacement, but it seems neither the II or...

I think that the point will be that differences that there may be just do not show in such a test.
With DR boost, basically you have two circuits reading part of the DR. The overlap exposed values...

Most well-priced camcorders have a very small sensor- if the training is not very well lit, the quality will be quite bad. The GH5 seems fine as budget option, using manual focus on the board. Doub ...

The first one looks fine to me, just a bit underexposed, second and third show the limitations of non-professional gear for birding, maybe a good hand with the raws could improve them somewhat. 850 ...

I agree.
For really low light photography, i still take my EM5.3 with a prime and can shoot sharp photos with really long exposures that i do not get with the a7r3a. which btw has quite some...

I would say yes- newer sensor, updated software, nice tilting EVF (the EVF itself is not great, but the tilting I find super useful. DfD may not be the greatest in 2022, but it is much better than ...

What I wanted was a good technical review, positive or negative.
What I had was rambling about some smaller topics, some positive, some negative.
I wanted to know more about what seems to be a...

Building on the comment prior, even Tony N. realized that his Canon drift off focus as frequently if not more than the gh6, with static subjects. MF lock on those cases, all the way.

The Gerald Undone "review" was really disappointing, not about the camera (that he barely checked) but about him. Seeing someone burn out on the job kind of "live" in front of your eyes is sad. He...

Panasonic has had the same result, called 6k photo with pre-burst, but limited to jpegs.
I agree that it is a fantastic feature for wildlife. At 50 fps with AF, some would call it an USP and a...

Yes, I think I was not clear in my comment- but both answers highlight what I meant, thanks.

yes, pundits bi**ing about 20fps vs 30fps... now 50 is the game :-)
for certain sports use, well lit stadion, that allows a more mobile photographer and 50 fps more exact moment choice.
if iso...

good point.
For me, ff telephoto seems to be limited to safaris or events that have photography as a main, important, relevant reason to be, and when carrying any x-600 lens is acceptable.
For my...

yes, I agree completely.
it is more like the gh5 2 vs gh5.
well, a bit more upgrade.
but it is like: if i want one of them, then the newer. the old one is dead now.
I like the camera, first choice...

Not sure why you say that the readout speed does not match the top FF- which one gets 120 fps raw?
I do believe OM does not get the credit they deserve for useful tech that is included, specially...

This is extremely dangerous and dpreview should not encourage the homebrew of such "solutions".
High energy battery systems (common for UPS and Photovoltaics) are made with many safeguards in place...

I would tip the Sigma 30 1.4. I have had the 20 1.7 and 25 1.7, both fine lenses, but not even close to the sigma 30mm in sharpness or otherwise.

... and Canada is in America ;-)
(Canadian spelling mostly follows US-standards, right?)

I think there are several factors at play here... I think they absolutely failed to understand the video-AF requirement of wedding, event and generally "people-photographers", who also do video. ...

Yes... It is in many cameras and I actually get surprised-annoyed when the picture is taken, while I "only" wanted to focus on the subject.