ChristianC1975

The difference from APSC and FF is 1 + 1/3 stops, not 2/3. That is between M43 and APSC.
Other than the nerdy correction, I agree with the conclusions of the article.

not inmy opinion. 4k or 6k mode does not only give you lowe resolution (anyone should be ok with it), it has 8 bit 4:2:0 at least in my camera, so pics look less good than jpegs or raws

I hated the cuts. The rest was fine.

I have the G9 and I like it. Having said that, for landscapes you will have a bit less bit depth and dynamic range than the Sony- it is your decision if that is important for you. APSC is 1.25 ...

in 24-70 IBIS is more than enough- go over 200mm and then you may start to want lens stabilization with or instead of IBIS.
So they keep the lenses smaller and cheaper (kind of ;-))

The cinema features are so many and apparently well implemented...

... I sense the smell of a gold award.

sooo...
Remember that 60p is for the moment something for specific uses, not for general recording. Then the crop hurts less.
The real point of the camera is to give both the quality and the tools...

Yeah why care about things actual dps use and need if you can have an amazing af they don't?
No 10 bit for video is like telling a pro photographer to stick with jpeg. Possible but much worse than...

In narrative video, higher than 24p is slow o, it is used in spezialized shots, where you don't care about things like crop bc it is the exception.
Anyway today's sensors in ff just cannot get full...

sensor reading just does not make it, they have read just a few of the lines (half) or they would not keep the 30 frames/second. Seems to be some limitation in Canon-own sensors

I saw the Cameralabs video and it is quite jerky in it too- but maybe we are just getting used to a crazy nice level by other models- like AF, which has improved so much that what we used to call...

maybe just my opinion, but that is far away from being "smooth stabilized 4k". It jerks and it is not very well stabilized.

@cosinaphile
yes, I realized later (see my later post), it is bigger so diffraction is less critical.
The point however is that the aperture limit for diffraction at those resolutions is way below...

Hype is real.
The guys of photolari (of mild fame around here once a year) compared the super-hyped P30 pro with cheap PS with zoom...
...
And the P&S held well, crushing the phone in zoom...

... and I missed the sensor size; it is bigger than the usual sensor for a phone- so my calculations are off by one stop or so.
Anyway, I think it is marketing, bc. as far as I know the quality of...

What I mean is that if resolution is lower than the pixel count, why would you bother to make things more complicated adding pixels that will not give you more information, as the diffraction...

Ehhhhh diffraction anyone? Where does it start in that sensor type?
I thought in MFT it was about F5.6 for 20Mpx, so this sensor is 8x smaller, right? F zero point what for 27 Mpix?
Does it then...

they use the GH5... Let me say it: 10-bit! That is like the difference between raw and jpeg in stills- it lets you work better bc. you have more flexibility.
Still baffled that Sony is not giving...

pretty low quality trolling, too obvious.

ah! good to know.