Jonas Palm

The GPU is useful for photography for certain operations in certain software. Driving the screen resolution is trivial these days.

Thus, to judge the utility of the GPU for photographic purposes...

These SoCs don’t compare to the RTX4090.
The RTX 4090 is a desktop graphics card drawing some 400W on its own. These SoCs go into laptops that offer full performance on battery power (and long...

a) They exist.
b) They are useful in some sizes for some people. That’s enough.
c) There is a point in moving technology to a point where it is simply good enough, and thus removed from...

Arguably the plot was lost when the he chose to disregard DOF. Those two stops is why m43 has the same lightgathering performance as any other format for subjects that aren’t both perfectly flat and ...

Which is conceptually very close to the OM-5. Photocentric classic design, weather sealed, low weight. The differences between the two are obvious, and telling. The XT-5 is pretty much what I hoped ...

Lovely shots! I’m so jealous, I might put this on my to-do-before-I-die list.

Yup, so do I. It doesn’t have to have the blazing read-out speed of the OM-1 or even E-M1iii, I’m good with a modern 50 or so MP camera that’s rooted in photography and extends into video. ...

The assumption that this is the E-M1iii in the E-M5iii body could be optimistic.

Ten of them in all. What good is a list of them to you? Well you seem very bothered by the fact that I don’t praise the new company enough for your liking. But I do indeed have other places to be ...

No, not really, when it comes to product development, But that is not a critisism - it’s simply a function of time elapsed. It remains to be seen, and as I said, the promotion videos they released ...

I have DxO5, didn’t buy 6 yet. In the image sample comparisons I have seen XD does indeed remove more noise, but also seems a bit heavy handed, and some detail is smoothed over just as in regular ...

Well, all of that was probably (and in the case of stacking and subject detect focussing, definitely) started when under the Olympus umbrella. I like Dave Etchells japanese interviews, but I wish ...

Or it may simply be that the lead time for designing a new body is such that the bulk of it was done while they were still at Olympus. Which would also explain the ”Olympus" logo, and the ...

Of course all effort is on the GH series, as that is the only series where they have something new to promote! Plus, they seem to be really competitive in that niche. But the GH series doesn’t ...

It's not really clear to me how you can make that assertion, but be that how it may, if Panasonic doesn't continue this model series, it will simply loose those sales. As Ab indicated, the GH6 ...

I think that is why the OP wants an updated GX9! And I have to agree, I think the GX9 has a great form factor for portability/travel and nice ergonomics in general apart from it’s somewhat dubious ...

Well - we’ll see about that in due time. It’s not as if there aren’t aspects that can be improved from the EM-5iii outside the sensor, but a $1600 body times exchange rate plus VAT, had better ...

Or, you know, he may simply not be under an NDA, and thus not restricted. Occams razor, and all that..

The things you mention are effects of higher speed read out and processing. That’s my point, that’s what the new sensor and processor brings to the table. If you cut that down, you cut directly ...

If you don’t actually use the fast read-out, the stacked sensor is kind of pointless.