fPrime

Miki, so true. Nikon had better launch their mirrorless in a new wide mount with a short flange distance to allow the full range of legacy glass to be used. Otherwise it preserves Sony's lens...

JustmeMN, they most certainly dominate APS-C crop mirrorless just as I said. Look up the CIPA numbers for yourself.

Finally it's officially confirmed... Nikon considers the DF to have been a commercial failure.

No one here is surprised, of course. It was a gimped camera from the start without the EVF, focus...

Yeah, it "must" be full frame only because Fuji already dominate the APS-C crop mirrorless market, wink, wink. ;-)

NarrBL, sorry but you came off as a post-modern, non-humanized, blacked-out, expanded-breadth fool with this post. Apologies if I left out any clichés...

This latest set of SOOC images confirms it for me. I still don't think Nikon knows how to process natural looking images from high megapixel sensors with high DR.

I can see where Nikon is trying...

You don't understand. This is simply the continuation of comments started over a week ago on the D850, not 600 people chiming in all at once on DR.

jay jay02 - Have to agree. I was looking specifically to see if the SOOC image quality lives up to the hype that some are giving it, but here it looks like the output of any modern CMOS DSLR to...

Satyaa - no I mean 50mm will have a wider DOF at same aperture than the 85mm you were proposing.

Also, recommend you look up the results Thorsten Overgaard gets with his Noctilux 50mm f/.95... you...

Ahhh... but what if it costs $10K like the Noctilux 50mm f/.95?

Hardly. Many are awaiting a new Nikon mirrorless mount that's wide and has a short flange. Allows much greater flexibility in lens design.

Why 52/0.9? Check the output of the Noctilux 50mm f/.95... an ultra fast 50mm optic allows more DOF than an 85mm which helps when framing people. The wider view also makes for a compelling...

The Noctilux 50mm f/.95 seems to do quite well on a variety of full frame M cameras for general photography. The minority seeking lenses for astro will always be better served by other offerings.

The discussion is about 3D Pop. Not bokeh quality. What you are seeing in the bushes of my photo is simply busy bokeh. It's the type of rough bokeh that works well with 3D Pop. What you consider as ...

You are a pixel peeper then. Someone who zooms into trees at 100% and fails to see the forest around him. It's the curse of how digital monitors with 100% zoom have distorted your perspective. ...

Do you mean like this? What are you trying to suggest... 3D Pop only works with central subjects?  I can already tell you that's not true. fPrime

Once again... some random outdoor scene is NOT how to prove or disprove 3D Pop. A random scene may not have the proper scene geometry for demonstrating dramatic 3d Pop with any lens. And without ...

For sure, from as prolific a poster as you are on forums (what's it been, a whole 20 posts total on here in the last year?) that does say a lot, haha. It tells me you might need to come out of your ...

Now this is more like it, haha.  You've instantly become more readable, bravo! fPrime

Only the hand-designed, vintage glass from 1950-1990.  The computer designed lenses all had sharper corner and edges but rendered flat as pancakes.  Were you expecting me to say something ...