CrisL

What's your experience with 4K mode ? Here one of mine , of course the IQ , details are not stuning but with the good light we can expect to capture the unique moments , here when the eye is as ...

Yes I was also annoyed by that / It looks the rear screen is still activ even if you used the EVF so you need to switch off  the touch AF operation in the custom menu [Custom] → [Touch Settings] → ...

I am using Sylkipix  Panasonic Free Version 4.4 SE Edition

Because I can get this kind of picture on a fast moving bird. Despite the low light (800 ISO) I was able to get a burst of 6 good enough pictures RAW +jpeg I known it's not very nice IQ but for me ...

You will not be disapointed . I counted 14 continuous RAW+JPG before to pause or about 50 jpg only. Will be nice to see your best firts shots

Perhaps not stuning IQ but I love this and my FZ82 Processed from raw low light ISO 500 Processed from RAW Resample

I confirm with another type of picture that processing raw  looks to finish with a large improvement of the noise aspect. I processed Silkypix Look at this 200% zoom to enhance what I consider a ...

No i.zoom because I shooted in 8 MP (3840*2160) EX M mode . The sensor is just croped and the optical  EFL can be more than 1200mm .1200mm is the maximum EFl for the full 4/3 sensor . Like that ...

I added this 4K photo sample mp4 file  of the woodpeeker . https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_8VGC-iWlpgNnRnN1ZqemlMQ0E The woodpeeker is farer than on the still pictures so possible I was in ...

Thank you all for your interesting answers and questions . For these 4 pictures I cropped in real time as I shooted as usual for me in 16/9  8MP jpg (not 4k) mode and the EFL are between 1100 and ...

Here the link for the RAW https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_8VGC-iWlpgU2ljTXh3N1lLX2c

Here the SOOC jpg and the raw files Thanks to anybody to confirm what I found Compare the two in Fastone SOOC jpg

Interesting to compare with FZ330. I chosen  to move to micro 4/3 for better quality up to 800 mm equivalent with the PL100400 and I am quite  surprise with what I can do with the FZ82 Not really ...

I had always the dream to be able to shoot what I can see even briefly but as birders we known how difficult it may be to shoot birds in trees. With the FZ82 I am experiencing that this dream is ...

Probably true but thanks to the fast rafale we can take the FZ80 is much more fun to use than the P900 I known and the RAW files look interesrting as I just experienced. So depends but for my usage ...

Depends what you want to do and you expect ! Don't known the B700 , but against the P900 the ergonomy is much better thanks to the fast rafales we can take easily so much more fun to use . + it ...

Yes No problem I will try with the PANA 1.7 teleconverter . Not the best Not the worth but my experience with previous bridges is not very positive. The Izoom is not bad and may be an alternative.

Yes I  provide my feeling here https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59218421 . For me it's very positive but depends how do you want to use it and what you expect ?

Can you give us your appreciation on this  I shot today with good light This is handheld at full zoom (1200mm) and the plane is at 1250 m This is from the RAW file processed with Silkypix and ...

I have still no conclusion on I. Q comparison. I have still to do a fair test in controled conditions . I just wanted to emphasize on FZ80/82 advantages . But P900 and P610 has certainly other ...