TheDarmok74

You're so cool, you probably only use the best gear available and you always have it with you. You are awesome!

Only that super WA is something anybody has good use for, bird pics are not for everybody and it's a very special thing that a phone can't be good at. Apples and oranges....

I'd say between 14-16mm but no fisheye of course.
Don't know what my LG G6 equals to but I'd guess 12-14mm.

Super WA would be great. That's why I love my LG G6.
I think people don't know what they're missing. Once you have it, you tend to use it a lot.

That's quite a stupid remark considering that I said the RX100 series IS very sharp and that we are talking about compact cameras and that a SLR is by no means a guarantee for a sharp lens and.....

I didn't know that there's still NR software. Gotta take a look at that, even if I hate shooting RAW, but if it's worth the hassle, then I could try and learn the additional workflow.

It was what is called a rethorical question and how could I not have understood when I said myself "Only the first with a 1" sensor,...."?
I pointed out a mistake, they could change it. That's all.

Of course that was meant, but it's not written that way ;-)
And yes, the RX10 series is not the catagory of travel zoom as created by Panasonic with their TZ series.

"The RX100 VI, with its 24-200mm equivalent lens, marks Sony's entry into the travel zoom sphere"

Why is this the first Sony travel zoom? Only the first with a 1" sensor, but they had 1/2.3"...

Yes, it IS very expensive but to me this is a camera that has no rivals. The Panas are nice but for one important feature: sharp lens.
I have been using mirrorless cameras on and off for a couple...

I upgraded from the MkI to MkIV.
Yes, the I is still good, but as a main camera, the IV offers enough benefits to upgrade.
As for the VI....would be temtping, but I am so happy with the IV, so for...

These RX10 models keep getting more expensive and they don't really get much cheaper as with time. Good fpr Sony and they are indeed great cameras, BUT why no intervalometer? What did they think...

I wish them the best but after the first try and the DL desaster I don't believe anything they say.
The next step has to be some Google style smarts in the image processing, that will be the...

I am confused as to OIS. I thoguht it had it but only in photo mode.
Your specs seem to indicate that it only has it for the tele lens.
So there is no OIS in the 27mm equ lens? Is it really all...

Having seen the samples on DXO I have hopes that the Software is not bad. The night shot is impressive but oversharpened and too much HDR applied. Hopefully this can be tuned down.
Otherwise, they...

>>Looking at the provided sample images, the system appears to be doing an impressive job. That said, these kind of marketing images have to be swallowed with a pinch of salt

Makes me think of the...

When did we first hear the rumors about a 40MP camera? Late last year, and ever since I was hoping for some kind of PureView pixel binning. Seems that won't be he case and somehow I fear it won't...

Positive: More resilient than the ultra breakable S8, so that's good.
Negative: You either still have to carry this nice phone in an ugly bumper case or risk several hundred dollars for a new...

Yes, some peolpe. Some people might think this defeats the purpose of having a stylish all glass device if they are forced to put it in an ugly silicone bumper or some sock.
FWIW I just watched...

Glad I could help.