TheDarmok74

Very impressive indeed.
2 things come to mind: a second camera would be very welcome, but not a tele lens but an ultra WA lens. This is so useful, any body who's tried it once won't want to miss it...

Wow, many, many cons.
Maybe they should have given it another 6 months or so and bring a finished product to the market. Sony won't be impressed, Nikon neither. If Pana gets it right with their...

Looks good but I am amazed how you can write such an article without mentioning the Pixel even once. They've started serious computational photography in smartphones.

Personally, I won't get an...

A great setup, but as a G6 owner I can only hope that the beefed up their image processing A LOT.
With the Google app, the images are ok, without it, the great super WA lens is unusable, in my...

Since I had the Mk II (and other Olympus bodies) I know this. But the question is, if the Mk III really dropped this setting (along with several others which it certainly dropped).

I read some conflicting information on this. Can an actual owner confirm if it's true that on the Mk III you cannot disbale the AF assist lamp? That would indeed be a problem in some settings. ...

I got the Micro with the Panasonic G81/85 and while it was ok, I wasn't too impressed, considering the great reviews. Now it could be that my expectations were too high or that I got the wrong mic ...

That's the main reason I still consider m43. And the hope that Olympus WILL release a new body after years of stagnation in the low and middle segments.

Thank you for sharing this. Sounds a bit cryptic. So I guess with the 12-100mm the MkII will be slightly better than IBIS only but not as good as with the E-MI Mk II (6.5 stops). The E-M10 Mk III ...

Thanks David!

This may seem a strange combo but I am looking for the lightest camera possible and a lens that I hardly ever need to change yet which offers great IQ. With this combo and the super lightweight ...

I suppose most RAW shooters care for this jpg feature and maybe Fuji thinks that their DR modes are enough but as you said, cell phones have been doing this for years, the RX100 MkI does it,...

I get it that most people don't care about the lack of in-camera HDR on these bodies, but the lack of IBIS is a huge letdown on an otherwise seemingly perfect camera. It's 2018, by the way.

In the meantime I had the G85 with the 12-60mm kit lens and it is a great lens. This one and a super WA cover almost everything I ever want to do (maybe a small prime for portraits).

So is she not missing tracking AF? Probably not, as would most people. This is as entry as entry goes, so tracking AF is not an issue. (Post more intended to the poster above obviously).

Never had it in hand but judging from the pictures I'm sure you are right. It also looks ugly while the other Fujis look really nice. My only point is that it seems to be the best bang for the ...

The X-T3 won't have IBIS either and I guess not even in-camera HDR, a feature cell phones have had for 3 generations.
Not everybody's priority, I know, but if they all have it, why Fujifilm not?

Although it is a good deal deeper than the Nikon models, there is no IBIS. That's a shame. eight is also equal.

https://www.mediamarkt.at/de/product/_fujifilm-x-a5-mit-objektiv-xc-15-45mm-3-5-5-6-ois-pz-silber-1635018.html?ga_query=Fujifilm%20X-A5 419€, plus, there's a 15€ promo code, but I don't have it at ...

No, it's an online deal from Austrian electronics chain Media Markt. It's actually 419€, I just saw that there is a promo code that gets it down to 404€, that's including 20% VAT. Personally I ...