TheDarmok74

If I'm not very mistaken there's still no good, compact and affordable kit lens for Sony E mount, not even from Sigma.

Actually this makes a lot of sense in the Olympus lineup. M43 will only survive if it plays its strengths as a lightweight system with small and affordable lenses. This makes a good alternative to...

As to IQ between 6000 and 6x00:
I looked at the comparison here and at ISO 3200 or 6400 there seems to be very little difference in the jpgs (which is what I'm interested in, granted).
Don't know...

A fair review, as expected.
You can turn it anyway you like and of course it is a great family camera but it also costs 900$.
My take is this:
It's been 5 years since the A6000 and looking at the...

Another point to consider is that Panasonic eg offers both and they work together well.
Or take the Olympus 12-100mm. I only use it with the E-M10 MkIII which doesn't work quite as well with that...

You may like them to do so but I woulnd't expect it, not at all, I would be very surprised ;-)
But go to allaboutsymbian or similar sites by Stve Litchfield, he's just the guy to do this sort of...

While I doubt they will equal Samsung, Google or even Huawei, it's great to hear another manufacturer investing in imaging R&D. More and more companies are taking imaging seriously and that's a...

Very impressive indeed.
2 things come to mind: a second camera would be very welcome, but not a tele lens but an ultra WA lens. This is so useful, any body who's tried it once won't want to miss it...

Wow, many, many cons.
Maybe they should have given it another 6 months or so and bring a finished product to the market. Sony won't be impressed, Nikon neither. If Pana gets it right with their...

Looks good but I am amazed how you can write such an article without mentioning the Pixel even once. They've started serious computational photography in smartphones.

Personally, I won't get an...

A great setup, but as a G6 owner I can only hope that the beefed up their image processing A LOT.
With the Google app, the images are ok, without it, the great super WA lens is unusable, in my...

Since I had the Mk II (and other Olympus bodies) I know this. But the question is, if the Mk III really dropped this setting (along with several others which it certainly dropped).

I read some conflicting information on this. Can an actual owner confirm if it's true that on the Mk III you cannot disbale the AF assist lamp? That would indeed be a problem in some settings. ...

I got the Micro with the Panasonic G81/85 and while it was ok, I wasn't too impressed, considering the great reviews. Now it could be that my expectations were too high or that I got the wrong mic ...

That's the main reason I still consider m43. And the hope that Olympus WILL release a new body after years of stagnation in the low and middle segments.

Thank you for sharing this. Sounds a bit cryptic. So I guess with the 12-100mm the MkII will be slightly better than IBIS only but not as good as with the E-MI Mk II (6.5 stops). The E-M10 Mk III ...

Thanks David!

This may seem a strange combo but I am looking for the lightest camera possible and a lens that I hardly ever need to change yet which offers great IQ. With this combo and the super lightweight ...

I suppose most RAW shooters care for this jpg feature and maybe Fuji thinks that their DR modes are enough but as you said, cell phones have been doing this for years, the RX100 MkI does it,...

I get it that most people don't care about the lack of in-camera HDR on these bodies, but the lack of IBIS is a huge letdown on an otherwise seemingly perfect camera. It's 2018, by the way.