Pragmateek

Thanks a lot for your answers, they are really helpful. Indeed my main misconception was to consider the lens as a window, missing the convergence of the rays, which by the way would make the ...

Hello, I'm missing something with the way angle of view ( α on the diagram) is computed. Because in the case of a single thin lens the sensor should be able to get rays entering into the lens by ...

You are right, for most purposes, including posters, 20Mp should be more than enough. And to be honest, I should confess that most of the time the stills are shared through Facebook which AFAIK ...

Thanks for your feedback Pannags. Glad we came to the same conclusion, though not completely for the same reasons: I prefer colours fidelity (i.e. similar to what I see) rather than esthetics, so ...

Thanks for your answer Kelly. You're right, and as I told at some point I even considered the A6400, mainly because of the price difference with the A6600: 550 bucks to get the IBIS but losing ...

Thanks for your answer Ed. :-) You're right, but even knowing my needs, or I believe so because my practice is, of course, limited by my current photophone, and it will for sure change with a ...

Hello, since August I'm looking for the best compact APS-C camera for my usage: 70% landscapes, 20% flowers/trees/plants, 10% animals and buildings. I've considered then excluded: (1) the Fujifilm X-T4 ...

Thanks, glad to know.

Indeed, but I don't consider these as game changers. AFAIK the battery is the same as the A6600. This one is on my radar. :) Indeed this is a point that I'm weighting. The downside is that they ...

Thanks for your opinion. I don't consider A6100 and A6400 because they don't have IBIS which restricts the choice of lenses to the stabilized ones. Though for sure the A6400 is better value for ...

Yes, I was comparing to the 6400. Glad all is in the box. :)

Thanks for this reference, this is probably the lens I will buy after the zoom. :)

Thanks for your feedback. And you'll gain IBIS. :) Even without zooming into the image? I guess the A6600 has these features too, maybe via a firmware update... I'm looking for the right balance ...

Indeed but they are not from the same "serie": - low-end: A6000 (April 2014) -> A6100 (October 2019) ~5.5 years - middle-end: A6300 (March 2016) -> A6400 (April 2019) => ~3 years - high-end: 6500 ...

Thanks for your feedback. So if I go the A7C way the Tamron 28-200 is a no-brainer. But indeed with A6600 42mm is too narrow for landscapes and buildings. So maybe the Sony 18-135 would be a good ...

This is a point in favour of the A7C over the A6600, and hopefully they are not that much bulkier.

Indeed, though in the short term I will be perfectly happy with the relatively limited offer of APS-C lenses, in the long run I might become more demanding, especially for low light, time will ...

I could wait for monthes, but the release cycle of Sony is quite long: A6500 was released in autumn 2016 and A6600 in autumn 2019, so at the same pace the next one would be released in 2 years. :-) ...

Thanks Peter for mentioning this important point. I've checked reviews of the 24-240 and indeed it is surprisingly disappointing. :-(

Thanks for you answer. I too find it overpriced but probably Sony does not want to affect the A7 III which is still selling well AFAIK, as would be the case if the A7C was priced cheaper. Indeed ...