Archied

To be fair its a medium format 100mp non stacked sensor

A shorter tele lens usually means really impressive miniaturizing or sacrificed large apertures ( newer sony g primes )

You should see the GM equivalents , because tamron isnt really able to...

The mount is by single lens approval - this will kill their 28-70 f2 sales or at tge very least hamper it .

They wont allow it.

Ironic becaise tamron is involved internally with sony and nikon.

Obs does that already and that is as basic as stream app goes.

No it doesnt bake the lut into the footage , it bakes the lut into the stream received from the cam.

Nah , ibis on drone cams are bad , like real bad.

Its a good thing they removed it.

While it is expensive , it is so for a reason.

Your ais wont be as sharp , as fast or as reliable as this 35 150.

Cheaper alternatives are alternatives , never the replacement for the status quo.

@panther fan , you should tag op instead

Fair observation

Idk man , the sig 30 1.4 is sharper than the e 35 1.8

Yeah about that . .

The sigma lineup is cropping up on Z bodies

@Husband80 , but the option does exist.

Noted , i forgot that 100Mbps is 12,5MBps and not 10MBps as in U1 and C10 I ordered it anyway and will report back - if it doesnt then its 8$ anyway , thanks for the info

A short question . Does the sandisk ultra ( the 64gb 140MBps refresh ones ) support 4k on a6400 ? Judging from the uhs-i limit , it maxes out anyway ( yes i know the 140 is with a compatible reader ...

Agreed , the fact that dji offers cheap 1inchers , apsc , and ff in drones with a 'reasonable' price bracket killed skydio

No the g85 does not beat the a6700 i anything but ibis , though it does so at a comparable margin ~ 2 stops or so more

Yeah i second that , the 33mp isnt the best , its a bit better than a6400/a6600's but not by much

Theres ups and downs

Gh6 is for filmmakers and those who dont need pdaf
The 4k60 on a6700 has no crop
And id like a list of a 1incher with 4k120

Theres the sig 56 1.4

Yeah , while i do myself use a 1.4 - more often than not , i'd have to drop down to f2 or f2.8 to get usable shots of something more than a sliver of hair

And while i wouldnt necesarily buy a...

I agree , the 16-50 pz isnt the best , and the fuji 15-45 xc while optically sound is also another pz - i had to deal with both for a while - Is the tamron 18-300 good though ? , For some reason ...