nnowak

If you prefer the 40-50mm equivalent field of view, is there a particular reason you are excluding the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 and Canon 32mm f/1.4 from your consideration?  A 24mm lens only gets you to ...

Engineering costs would be low due to the reuse of existing components and designs, but that is where the cost savings end. All regulatory approvals would need to be completed. Manuals in every ...

Yes, possibly this Spring.

£2,149 is a lot less than the £3,999 cost of a R6 II kit with 24-105mm L.  The Fuji kit also weighs nearly 400 grams less.

Wex in the UK has the X-T5 kitted with the 16-80mm for £2,149. Alan Sh likely paid less than that. For comparison, a bare body R6 is £1,999 and the R6 II is £2,779 on the same site. The R6 II ...

Wex in the UK has the X-T5 kitted with the 16-80mm f/4.0 for £2,149.  Alan Sh likely paid less than that.

Cropping to match the field of view of the 90mm will leave you with 15.4MP on a sensor area just a bit bigger than that of a 1" sensor. Sure, it will work, but you are giving up a lot of image ...

Congrats on your new camera! Coming from Canon, the Fuji control methodology will probably feel like the polar opposite.  With a little practice, I'm sure you'll acclimate quickly.

There is some weird repetitive color banding in the water on the left side of the frame that looks like an error in the pixel shift merge.

I use glass screen protectors on all of my cameras.  They are inexpensive, readily available, and I have never had any installation issues.

No. I think buffer capacity is an area where manufacturers can cut costs and many people won't notice.  It is one of those hidden specifications that you never notice until it becomes a problem.

While storage is getting g cheaper, camera buffers do not appear to be expanding as quickly.  The buffer capacity of the X-T5 appears to be smaller than my X-T3.  I am not opposed to more ...

Yes, full frame will have about one stop more dynamic range (DR) than your X-T2, but only if you can still shoot at the same ISO.  If f2.8 is the widest you can go on your X-T2 to maintain enough ...

You keep talking about this magical cropping power of the 32MP sensor as if it was a quantum leap above the older 24MP sensors.  The math simply does not support your repeated claims. To get to an ...

Not yet.  Sigma has already stated that they will be doing lenses for Z mount.

I am not sure if I am following your dates. The RF mount launched in September of 2018 with the EOS R.  It was almost an entire year later when the M6 II launched in August of 2019.  Right from the ...

They will get sued by Canon if it has the RF mount.  Depending on the size and placement of the rear element, it may be incompatible with both EF and EF-M.

At least in the US, the M5 outsold the original M6 by a fairly large margin.  I am not sure why Canon did not upgrade the M5.  The most logical guess is that the R10 and R7 were supposed to launch ...

Histograms won't help you if you're light painting. The one technology that would be useful for light painting is something that I think is only available from Olympus/OM cameras.  It is called ...

Sorry, I forgot about those because no one in this forum seems to actually be using any of them.  All of the discussions revolve around the EF-M 32mm and the Sigma trio.