nnowak

No, it won't. The M6 II might match the 5D III, but it certainly won't "smoke" it. Quote directly from the page you linked: "These raw values are not appropriate for comparing camera models because ...

First off, you have some beautiful images in your portfolio. I don't know what lenses you currently rely on for your work, but you should go through the EF-M catalog and see if there are suitable ...

That is still less than half the data rate people are getting with the M6 II and UHS II cards A lot of the wobbling in that video is severe rolling shutter in combination with the lack of ...

Especially in outdoor situations, I would be less concerned about changing batteries and far more worried about breaking a plug on either end. You also have absolutely zero weather protection with ...

3500 mAh is 4 times the LP-E12.  By your own estimates you said you get 2 hours use out of a single LP-E12.  How often do you need to shoot hand held for more than 8 hours without changing batteries?

First, your math is off.  That linked battery pack is 22,000 mAh at 8.4 volts.  Second, your weight estimates are off.  Your gripped D300 weighs around 1350 grams.  That power bank you linked is ...

Exactly.  It also does not change the sensor readout speeds, the limited buffer, or the limits of a UHS I card slot.

Those are the in-camera defaults.  Using the Magic Lantern firmware hack opens up other resolutions and frame rates.  The OP was specifically asking about RAW video which is something entirely ...

Magic lantern was great 10 years ago when DSLR video was in its infancy. Magic Lantern was enabling new and unheard of features on cameras like the 5D II.  If I remember correctly, RAW video from ...

Compared to the 11-22mm, the EF-S 10-18mm is 30% cheaper, has a wider FoV, and vignettes less.  That list sounds like all positives for a "budget conscious photographer doing landscapes"

They did... https://www.dpreview.com/products/tamron/lenses/tamron_100-400_4p6-6p3_di_vc_usd It is not exactly small and light, but it is smaller and lighter than the Canon EF 100-400mm L II.

Both cameras can shoot 4k.  The Fuji will have more detail.  The Canon will have less rolling shutter. AF and audio recording are disabled when you shoot 120p on the M6 II.  Not so with the X-T200

You also need to consider what it will cost to get back that 2.6mm.  A quick search looks like you would need to add the manual focus Laowa 9mm f/2.8 lens for $500 It all depends on your personal ...

Not as much as you might think.  If you print at 300 pixels per inch, the 24mp sensor would yield a 20" X 13.3" (50.9cm X 33.9cm) print and the 32mp sensor would yield a 23.2" X 15.5" (58.9cm X ...

WOW!  Your images are routinely some of the best in this forum, but this is a new level of spectacular.  Your skills and preparation clearly paid off.  Congratulations!

In the US and Canada, you would likely call it "Scotch" tape.  In the UK it would be called "Sello" tape.  Basically, any matte/frosted translucent tape that you would use for taping paper ...

There were a LOT of times I went out with just my M2, EF 100-400mm L, and EF-M 22mm.  In comparison to the 100-400mm, the 22mm is so small it barely counts as an extra lens.  Occasionally I would ...

Not too surprising. In the overlapping focal lengths, the Canon and Sigma are both better than the superzoom Tamron.  The images from the Canon are noticeably better even when looking at the tiny ...

The M50, M5, EVF-DC1 and EVF-DC2 all use the same resolution LCD panel with the same level of magnification.  Color and contrast may vary a bit due to firmware, but for all purposes they are ...

25.6mm equivalent vs. 21mm equivalent.  The horizontal angle of view goes from 69.5 degreess to 80.3 degrees.  If you were shooting a subject at a distance of 10m, the horizontal view would go ...