|
neo_nights
Lives in
Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
Works as a
Student
Has a website at
http://neonights.zenfolio.com
Joined on
Oct 10, 2007
About me:
Plan? To take over the world! |
Comments
 |  |
| Orange-tip Butterfly by anisah from Nature's Colour Palette | Windswept juniper by Kreber from Wind power |
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
PIX VideosTalks, demos and panels
712The Canon that canCanon EOS 80D Review
373Touchscreen street shooterFujifilm X70 Review
2165Upwardly mobileSony a6300 Review
338Power ZoomPanasonic Lumix ZS100/TZ100 Review
2501Retro through-and-throughFujifilm X-Pro2 Review
716Bang for the BuckOlympus OM-D E-M10 II Review
401Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X Review
Kirkjufell mountainBehind the Shot: Shredded
334Can we get much wider?Canon EF 11-24mm F4 L USM gallery
2157Playing the Ace?Sony Alpha 7R II Review
179Bag ReviewPeak Design Everyday Messenger
41Readers' ShowcaseNicolas Alexander Otto
177Super Zoom? Tamron 150-600mm F5-6.3 Field Test
123Bag ReviewDomke Chronicle: A classic reinvented?
1621OpinionThe myth of the upgrade path
199Beyond the table top5 mini tripods reviewed
103VideoTamron SP 15-30mm F2.8 Field Test
It's a shame that Microsoft won't continue Nokia's work with bigger sensors...
I can't help but wonder if those ever-so-thin smartphones couldn't be, I don't know, a couple of millimiters thicker so they could have a bigger sensor (as well as a bigger battery).
Elandreth: "The Holga Digital camera features original optics that are known for their dark corners..."
Did they just try to advertise heavy vignetting as a positive feature?
@matthias - Or you could use a crop lens on a fullframe camera, right? (even on film it'd work!)
:p
Maciek_Leopolis: Would it be a nuisance if I asked - which floor was that balcony? One story would make a difference ;)
BTW In 1993 my Good Old Canon T90 survived a direct horse-backward-kick. Uuuups! Only a UV filter ring get damaged, 35mm lens was OK.
Be careful with the frog perspective images at the cavalry parades, folks ;)
According to the link provided in the news from LeicaStore Hong Kong:
"What if a Leica M9 accidentally drop from the roof (4/F) to granite floor?"
So now people will have to make a battle between Nokia's old cellphones and Leica M9.
And a new meme is born!
Eleson: What is that to the left of "Common storage media" ...?
Oh, ok!
I thought so, but.....
(sorry for being the Anti-Joke Chicken here!)
Eleson: What is that to the left of "Common storage media" ...?
Film (in case you weren't being sarcastic)
neo_nights: He "breaks" so many "rules" of many photosnobs here; he's very young, has only two "simple" cameras and... OMG, OMG!... shoots with the kit lenses!!!
Congratulations for him!!!
Only three exclamation marks? What was I thinking????????
Here, take some more !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:)
He "breaks" so many "rules" of many photosnobs here; he's very young, has only two "simple" cameras and... OMG, OMG!... shoots with the kit lenses!!!
Congratulations for him!!!
Horshack: Once again dpreview is showing their extreme Sony fanboyism and anti-Pentax bias with these studio samples, as indicated by this 100% crop:
http://horshack.smugmug.com/photos/i-kDC8jXN/0/O/i-kDC8jXN.jpg
@ Horshack:
"I considered it but the dog is facing the wrong way so I would've had to put your face on the dog's a** :)"
Something like this?
http://cl.jroo.me/z3/R/Q/G/d/a.aaa-funny-fun-the-funniest-dog-a.JPG
citizenlouie: Well, I want to point out something about copyright comment on the Photo 9. Yes, you do need model release, and it's not misconstrued. That's one of the lessons you learn when you take your photography class (and property release, for that matter). The tabloid is in constant legal fight (and they don't mind paying that if they believe they can earn more money selling the paper or blackmail the celebrity in question. It's not the norm of a proper photography practice!). Let's not forget those people paparazzi shot are "public" figures. Their legal right to their image is much more limited to that of regular individuals like us or the cosplay models. Because court judge would definitely ask how much privacy does the person in the photo expects, and that will affect the outcome of the law suit. Lesson... model release is a yes because it's respectful, if not legal.
Paparazzi shots are taken WITHOUT people's consent!
While for Cosplay, it IS part of cosplaying to be photographed! No one makes a cosplay to wear it in front of the mirror and then put it in the wardrobe again.
You DO need a model release if you are going to use it for commercial purposes (like releasing a book), surely.
For web usage, no you don't need a release. It's a consensual thing, based on goodwill. As such, of course, if the person asks the photographer to remove the picture from his/her website, then that should be done.
Never thought I'd see cosplay photography featured on DPReview!
Rooru S: no mention of the QX100...it has a 3.5x zoom with a 1.0 Type Sensor too...! and a better bracket to mount it on several types of mobile phones... Perhaps because DPR doesn't want to hurt DxO?
Until some chinese company comes up, buys the DPReview brand and release the DPR Camera.
If DxO can, why DPR can't? Right? I mean..... right?
Rooru S: no mention of the QX100...it has a 3.5x zoom with a 1.0 Type Sensor too...! and a better bracket to mount it on several types of mobile phones... Perhaps because DPR doesn't want to hurt DxO?
@Barney - But little did they know; you are actually sponsored by Pentax.
PandaSA: the next one is NEO.
I thought people wouldn't find out that I'm preparing a new camera. Damn!
Hands-on preview AND free French lessons! Thanks, Barney!
MariusM: Looks like she's holding the hand of a zombie.
To please the Internet public, which happens to love zombies so much.