jbancroft1957

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/56106732

Tend to agree. I remember posts from years ago saying it was susceptible to shutter shock with certain lenses.

Yes, or even an f4 as a more compact alternative.

What about auto-focus speed, is there a difference? Thanks

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67302021 Regards John

As Jonathan Mac said, 'Of course any Canon APS-C system with anything more than crappy variable aperture zooms was doomed from the start.'

Thinking about RF-S, whilst the variable aperture zooms...

Thank you for your easy to understand explanation and answer. I shall bookmark this for future reference! John

Hi Please can someone advise. Let's say you take two photos of a subject from a fixed position using these combinations. 1. APS-C 24MP at 135mm 2. FF 45MP at 70mm If you crop the image from 2 to ...

I'm thinking more a RF-S 15-70mm f4 (or something very similar).

Amazon UK. Generally underwhelmed on photography related savings.

It's as though Canon are deliberately ignoring this one, desirable lens once again (think EF-M), for all but their full frame range? Or maybe that's just my own conspiracy theory? 😀 John

Like 'the Clash' comment 🙂

Yes, the G9 would seem to be better suited for my usage. Thank you.

Just found out the GH5II price offered was an error so original question no longer applies. Apologies

Both bodies only and both new.

Hi Are there any disadvantages in buying the GH5II rather than the G9 (for mostly photography)? I've the opportunity of buying a GH5Ii for near enough the same price as a G9. Thanks John

@PGH423 I'd be genuinely interested in the lenses you're using to cover the 18-200 range. Are they native and reasonably affordable?
Thanks

As an aside, I find I get much more accurate and consistent results on my A7IV with AWB (white priority).

Not sure if I missed it but do we know the buffer size when shooting in continuous RAW(s)?

That would be my dream!