JJ1983

105mm MC wins by a small margin. It's replaced the ultimately fine and splendid 85/1.8 because of versatility. But I gotta say the 24-70/4 has unexpectedly become the workhorse of my lineup. I ...

I had a D600, then an X-T1 and an x-T2 before switching to Z6. I love the ergonomics of the Z6 above the Fuji's, although some things take getting used to. Image quality is just so much better, ...

Answer two both of your questions: Jared Polin

Cats don't have owners, they are the owners.

I have a combo of 20, 35 and 85. I think the 24 and 35 would be too close for my liking. Also the 20 is so sharp, you can easily crop. OTOH sometimes i just want to walk around and be versatile. In ...

I have 20, 35, 85 20 for landscapes, nightscapes and fun perspective 35 for urban, short portrait, family 85 for portrait and landscape

"Anything"?

A 6000 dollar car would definitely be 'for the masses'.

Good news. Not big enough for me to switch, but nice to know.

I switched from FF Nikon DSLR to Fujifilm XT1, XT2 to Z6. Pros for Fuji are really good jpegs, smaller lenses, good variety of lenses, good exposure settings and very good white balance. Pros for ...

I have a Z6 after having owned a D600, so my viewfinder was just a bit tinier than yours. Going to the Z6 didn't make much of a difference. The viewfinder is super fast and BIG. If anything it's a...

I went with 20 as I already had 35 and 85 (and also 24-70/4). 24 would be too close to 35 in my opinion. Look in your bag and decide what's missing.

I have a 35 and a 85. The 85 is a tad more crisp but really that's not a big deal. They're both much better than any 85 or 35 I've had before.

I mostly use my flashes off camera, but for a wedding I did last summer I also placed a Godox V860II on the Z6. It's a bit unbalanced, but it was certainly doable.