Grat

You'll probably also want to download the full manual from Canon, if you haven't already.

Fantastic pictures.  The photographer and the lens, I suspect, has as much to do with the image quality as anything, and Canon sensors have always been good. The jump from 20 (or 24) to 32 ...

Not surprising-- LV AF has 32 million pixels to work with, and OVF AF has 220 thousand.  That does have a speed penalty, unsurprisingly. There are settings for that.  Not only can you disable it, ...

It varies a bit now, because the camera was released in 2014, but the MSRP is officially still $1799 USD. It's a bit long in the tooth, and due for an upgrade, but the AF system is flat-out superb ...

So in viewfinder mode, the 90D uses a pretty high resolution RGB metering sensor (200+ thousand pixels, if I recall) to identify patterns and shapes, in conjunction with the traditional ...

I doubt you will.  It's a very nice camera.  There is a segment of people who were led into thinking that they were getting a replacement for the 7D Mk II with the 90D, in spite of it obviously ...

FIrst, make sure Canon EOS utility is installed (and running) on your PC (sitting at the "Connect an EOS Camera" screen). Then on the camera, open the Network menu (Purple tab), make sure wi-fi is ...

But, if as mentioned in another response, the new printer is getting 25% more printing for the same amount of ink, then the 50ml is effectively 62.5ml.

Doing some number mangling, I get 80ml for...

Yeah, I mean, Canon's only been using the flip-out screen design for what, 10 years? A tilt-only screen would be a pain for me, because I like the additional flexibility.

Your current computer *is* obsolete. By the time it made it to market, the tech companies already have faster, enhanced versions of the CPU, memory, motherboard chipset, SSD, and networking in the...

I don't get people who show up to say "I have no interest in this camera". You're obviously not who Canon is targeting with it, so why even bother?

I have no interest in a Ford F150-- But I don't...

OK, that's reasonable.  But why do people apply the crop factor to the the f-number (and therefore the depth-of-field) when that's only going to make sense depending on what size you print the ...

Typically, AF these days is accurate enough that as long as your camera locks onto the point you want it to, your image should be in focus. Some systems support full-time MF, so you can compose, ...

Considering how involved people get on the definition of "exposure", that seems to be a surprisingly acceptable inaccuracy. But that would be for an analog print (ie, an enlarger from a negative)-- ...

Strictly speaking (oh look, a nit-- I think I'll pick it!), "a pixel" is usually 4 values (RGGB) interpolated by whatever de-mosaicing algorithm is in use. But if I draw a 22.5x15mm rectangle in ...

This one has puzzled me for some time.  I agree that a 50mm lens on a 1.5x crop body will give the same field-of-view as a 75mm lens on a FF body.  However, I'm puzzled why people claim it changes ...

I'm not sure how well it would work on this composition, since the sky is only covering a portion of the image.  I think you'd still have to go back and lighten up the trees and rocks, as they'd ...

[ ... ] That's a lecture, not a model. And NOTHING in what you just said contradicts the original explanation of the photographic triangle.  You just said it in a more verbose form. Certainly, you ...

Only if taken in complete isolation from all other photographic concepts.

Examples? If there's a better way, by all means, let's promulgate it as much as possible. In every ISO / exposure discussion I've participated in around here, the response is to tell people they're ...