SergiCM

That was my previous kit for photography: 18-135, sigma 30 and 56 for low light, and samyang 12 for astro. I missed the 16mm focal and tried the Sigma. Too big for just 1 lens. I decided to go for ...

I had the same dilemma as you do and I went for the Sony 16-55. Compared with the 18-135 it's big and heavy. Especially heavy. If you prioritize size above all other things the Tamron is about ...

What I wanted to point out is that the Sony lens is sharper across the entire range based on the raw files that I checked. I also wanted to see if the crop at 55mm to make the field of view ...

I don't think I am contradicting my self, is just my opinion. Having the opportunity to get the Sony lens like new 100 euros cheaper than the Tamron. I did consider 3 main factors based on reviews ...

Hi. I had the same dilemma a week ago. I went for the Sony lens. I think if you are into photography it's a better lens (better IQ, size, build) always if you pay similar price for both. If you are ...

Many thanks for your post and comparing both lenses. You just made me more happy with my recent purchase of the Sony for 700€. I have to admit that for cameras without IBIS the Tamron even with its ...

I totally agree with you. The sigma is by far the best Apsc lens in the Sony line. And being that small you can carry it anywhere.

Hello. If you are wondering if the 16-55 cropped at the end is equal to the Tamron at 70 you can see it yourself with the raw files Jake Sloan made in his review. https://youtu.be/_PCd6LYL9KI I ...