Mirko123

Lives in Austria Austria
Joined on Oct 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (531 comments in total)
In reply to:

photomedium: I rented this and it's an impressive stills camera. However, they put the fn button in the most annoying place inside the grip and it protrudes out a heck of a lot more than in the 7200. This is a hefty camera, and that fn button kills what would otherwise have been amazing ergonomics like the d5500. WHY???

I totally agree.
The Fn1 button is simply HORRIBLE! It makes the camera totally unusable for me.
What an utterly stupid idea!

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 15:41 UTC
On article Review: Nikon D7500, speed and capability (531 comments in total)

Seriously? Has anyone ever actually held this camera? How can you have a "review" and NOT mention the incredibly annoying Fn1 button?

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2017 at 15:04 UTC as 61st comment | 4 replies

Seems like a nice lens, but i much prefer the new Tamron 10-24 f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC.
Its faster, has a metal mount, weather sealing, Image stabilization and its very sharp, for not much $$$

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2017 at 11:00 UTC as 54th comment

Im curious, what is the vetting process that DPR does before it posts these "random" videos?
Or maybe i should ask, how much does it cost to advertise a "tutorial" here?
Seriously guys, if anyone here is looking to learn more about lightroom and photoshop, there are a ton of videos out there on Youtube.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 04:03 UTC as 5th comment
On article Rare Nikon 1200mm F11 pops up on eBay (120 comments in total)

Is that a lens or are you just happy to see me?? :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 21:58 UTC as 32nd comment
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

@ Rainersen, huh??
Oh so original and coherent lol
What an imagination :-)
How old are you? 12?
You obviously havent been taking your meds
Go back to sucking your thumb, or whatever else you happen to be sucking.
Im sure youve had plenty of practice :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 19:38 UTC
In reply to:

Francis Sawyer: WHAT A JOKE. They act as though bit depth is the biggest problem. IT'S NOT.

The problem is compression level, which is glaringly absent from this sham of a "spec." There's no mention of minimum bitrate or compression scheme.

This means we're still facing a future of fraudulent "4K" or "UHD" that has no more real resolution than a cell-phone video, especially when there's movement in the image.

Low-bitrate, interframe-compressed junk is just that: JUNK.

@ 0MitchAG
Thats not true.
Channel 9 now broadcasts in 1080p, as does ONE.
Im sure more will be coming soon

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 10:51 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

Rainersen:
I think its really sad and pathetic that a low life such as yourself seems to have nothing better to do than go to online camea forums and parade as if you're some kind of big man.
I guess this is the only place where you feel that your useless existence has meaning.
In reality you would soil your pants and run off.
Enjoy the limelight little man

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 09:38 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

@Rainersen
Thanks for sharing
But if i wanted your brain dead opinion id slap in the head and give it to you
Now go back to cleaning toilets

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 19:50 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

True, but in that case, why not just get a D750 or another full frame?
Isnt the point of a DX to reduce size and weight?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 14:14 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

Nonsense? lol
Sensitive little flower aren't we :-)
Maybe youd feel better if you had a friend??

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 13:20 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirko123: Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

Higher pixel density = higher noise. Also lower resolution so i dont see the advantage there.
But year, sport and wildlife would be good.
Oh, and where are all the DX lenses?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 12:32 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1174 comments in total)

Looks good.
But im curious, whats the point?
You can get the D750, which is the same size and weight and will produce better images.
Who is the target market for this?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 10:20 UTC as 111th comment | 17 replies

£12,900 body only!!
Wow, what a sweet deal!
Im getting 2, as i always seem to loose one :-)

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2015 at 16:15 UTC as 56th comment | 1 reply

Nice. Can it make phone calls?

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 08:37 UTC as 10th comment

Nice, another 28mm equivalent lens. Im beyond excited

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 08:21 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Mirko123: This looks like a great lens. Well done Fuji!
While Nikon and Canon are stilling on their hands producing the same old, out dated rubbish and expecting us to buy.

@nerd2
Nikon FX systems are great, especially the new 750, but compare a Sony A7 to a D610?
There is a big size difference between the Nikon DX and FX bodies, not to mention the lenses.
Again, other makers are thinking outside the box, while Nikon and Canon are stuck in the past

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 20:24 UTC
In reply to:

Mirko123: This looks like a great lens. Well done Fuji!
While Nikon and Canon are stilling on their hands producing the same old, out dated rubbish and expecting us to buy.

@ Dougbm
Canon has a great range of lenses but their APS-C camera lineup is pretty poor.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 20:17 UTC
In reply to:

Mirko123: This looks like a great lens. Well done Fuji!
While Nikon and Canon are stilling on their hands producing the same old, out dated rubbish and expecting us to buy.

Im talking about APS-C format. Im a Nikon user and have been very disapointed. Unless you love kit lenses, Nikon has a weak lens line up, and seriously, how many slow, 18-xxx lenses do we need? And what are the improvements in their cameras? The new 5500 is seriously an insult to Nikon users. Canon has also been dropping the ball with very minor upgrades over the last few years. Sure, they might outsell their competitors, but their lead is shrinking

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 06:35 UTC

This looks like a great lens. Well done Fuji!
While Nikon and Canon are stilling on their hands producing the same old, out dated rubbish and expecting us to buy.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 01:26 UTC as 51st comment | 11 replies
Total: 40, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »