Icagel

Joined on Feb 14, 2019

Comments

Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2
In reply to:

tobicy68: Seems like a good camera. My only problem is that this camera + the EVF is more expensive than the EOS RP. Should I get this M6 II or the EOS RP? Such a tough decision.

I also have downloaded for more than 100 RAW files. Mostly I was orientated for high ISO and base ISO where I could see DR. So DR at base ISO are on m6 side. Starting ISO 800 RP files are more flexible and give lower noise levels. On base ISO it was enough DR for RP as well for 99% of pictures. But yes. Pushing 1.5-2 stops and in Shadows there are noise. But it is only for testing because I do not need to push all shadow information all the time.
I also checked my statistics of exif data and have found my 90% pictures are in 100-800 ISO range. FF frame lenses has good prices only with F1.8-2 values. 1.4-1.2 as I wrote are very expensive. So APSC with 1.4 will have almost the same noise levels in the same situations. Everything is compromises and personal preferences.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2019 at 17:47 UTC
In reply to:

tobicy68: Seems like a good camera. My only problem is that this camera + the EVF is more expensive than the EOS RP. Should I get this M6 II or the EOS RP? Such a tough decision.

I had the same issues and made a decision to take m6 mark II. M6 is faster, more versatile. Lenses are cheaper. I could not imagine I will buy 1.4 or 1.2 lenses for FF. They are very big and expensive. But for m6 there already are 1.4 lenses and they are cheaper, sharp and much smaller.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2019 at 16:31 UTC
Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2