capanikon

capanikon

Lives in United States WA, United States
Works as a photographer! :D
Joined on Apr 26, 2007
About me:

Hi. I'm just this guy, you know?

Comments

Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

... aaaaaand "full frame" just got it's ass handed to it. Permanently.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 22:07 UTC as 70th comment | 5 replies
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1188 comments in total)

Looks great. Finally we can start moving away from the teensy so-called "full frame" format.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 21:28 UTC as 72nd comment | 9 replies
On Article:8533054559 (70 comments in total)

DXO is generally overrated.

Posted on Apr 15, 2016 at 00:16 UTC as 12th comment | 4 replies

hmm

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 02:04 UTC as 96th comment

Neat.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 04:15 UTC as 196th comment
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2597 comments in total)

This is a winner.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 01:32 UTC as 570th comment

This headline is wacky: "Oh, wow... Sony announces 24MP a6300 with incredible AF and 8 fps live view bursts"

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 20:12 UTC as 54th comment
On article Delayed: Nikon Japan pushes D500 to end of April (139 comments in total)

Perhaps they are concerned about "scalpers" due to expected high demand. Imagine people buying D500s and then immediately putting them up on ebay for $4,000 because Nikon can't meet demand.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 19:23 UTC as 26th comment
In reply to:

capanikon: Let's see this work on a fast telephoto wide-open though.

that race car shot, for example, doesn't look like a 200 f/2.8 at all. It looks more like they shot it mebbe 100mm at f/11. Not impressed.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 20:27 UTC

Let's see this work on a fast telephoto wide-open though.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 19:56 UTC as 51st comment | 4 replies
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (243 comments in total)

I prefer the shorter 35mm f/2. More compact. This 35mm looks like a short tele!

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 18:48 UTC as 62nd comment
On article Top 5: Hands-on with Nikon D500 (801 comments in total)

Omitting the rinky-dink pop-up flash makes the D500 a more attractive camera, IMO.
Those pop-up flashes are beyond dumb. They belong only on Canon Rebels and the like.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2016 at 18:44 UTC as 149th comment | 8 replies
On article Nikon announces development of flagship D5 DSLR (442 comments in total)

yay.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 06:46 UTC as 150th comment

Too big, heavy, expensive for a 35mm. Stick to f/2.0 for 35's.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2015 at 17:05 UTC as 11th comment

Wow ... such low noise at ISO 800.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2015 at 05:19 UTC as 23rd comment
On article FAA proposes regulations for commercial drone usage (119 comments in total)

http://www.gravityshots.com/

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2015 at 20:52 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon D750 Review (1988 comments in total)

Looks like a great low-end/midrange FX body.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 04:19 UTC as 492nd comment | 1 reply
On article BPG image format aims to replace JPEGs (204 comments in total)

Wikipedia says "BPG is believed to be covered by some of the patents on HEVC, which makes LWN.net conclude that it is unlikely that BPG will replace JPEG, despite BPG's technical superiority."

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2014 at 23:22 UTC as 70th comment
In reply to:

capanikon: Eh. Canikon mirrorless is gonna crush Sony whenever they get around to taking mirrors seriously.

aps-c already has excellent dof control and great low-light performance. 35mm is one stop better in both regards. But medium format is even better than 35mm. I think aps-c provides a better balance than 35mm.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 17:47 UTC
In reply to:

capanikon: Eh. Canikon mirrorless is gonna crush Sony whenever they get around to taking mirrors seriously.

Personally I see little or no need for 36x24mm sensors (FF) in ML bodies as APS-C is more than good enough for my purposes. There is nothing magic about rectangles 36mm by 24mm in size. APS-C sensors also make supertelephoto glass more accessible, less expensive, lighter and smaller.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2014 at 01:11 UTC
Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »