PaulSnowcat

I DON'T use special sound players and don't use separate loudspeakers. That's why I pay attention to sound quality of my smartphone.

If I was an audiophile, I'd be using hifi player and i'd pay...

Photographer's guide for buying a smartphone.
1. Think about what screen you want to have, IPS or OLED? Larger or smaller?
2. Think about battery... Do you need a large one or no?
3. Think about...

No, not at default setting. Unfortunately I have to figure out settings for each picture with high ISO individually. That's a huge drawback. I just manually find the best setting.

Great review! Now THIS is the proof that phones shoot better then photo cameras :P

@TwoMetreBill, you are right, X-trans 4 with Topaz AI can be used up to 6400. BUT Silkypix can handle 12800. Here is the sample of extremely difficult picture (difficult for denoising), developed...

Well, I'll check it out for sure... I cannot use DXO with my new Fuji camera, so this IS quite a problem for me. I have to use SilkyPix instead, it can give results that are at least comparable...

Topaz is NOT the best. I recently switched to Fuji camera and I had to try EVERY noise removal software (stand alone or integrated in RAW processor) to get something that can be at least comparable...

Sorry to disappoint you, Deed, but you are wrong. I was a SONY user, and I still am a Nikon user. Both systems have enough hater-users. Those people that use the system and keep bashing it on ...

Photoshop was not used at all...

I am sorry, I've never seen the original discussion you're referring to, but I will add some thoughts from myself... If you have an 1.0 lens (or 1.2) if does not mean that you MUST use it wide ...

I increased sharpness somewhat (lightly) in pp (not dramatically)... Plus Sigma 50-100 is a very sharp lens. Even at 1.8. Even thought I "came" from film era I enjoy having good "digital" ...

I am not sure 50-100/1.8 will ever come natively t any mirroless system. It is a DSLR lens after all. If Sigma wanted to just "port" it to ML, I'd expect them already to do so at least for Sony E ...

Sure, here you are. Shot in RAW, developed in SiklyPix.

I just want to share some pics. These are shot with X-S10, Fringer NF-FX and Sigma 50-100/1.8 for Nikon. The combo works flawlessly - fast eye detection, spot on AF (as expected from a mirrorless ...

That's VERY strange... It should not be this way :)

Yep they've said it many times in the past, but last their statement was about time that passes and that they cannot say that this will never happen and that they are working on it. So hope...

Jeff, I've tried it and was VERY disappointed with it's ergonomics. I prefer classic shapes or camera bodies with deep grip. X-S10 is an ideal camera for me :)

When I saw the title i was thinking "Wow! At last PRIME for X-Trans!". But alas, still no PRIME for X-Trans... Too bad. DXO is my favoured soft for RAW processing. And I had to switch to Silkypix...

Thank you!

True, that's 24-450 in EQ... It is a great pleasure to use one. I was using one on Sony, then I've switched to Nikon and sold all my Sony gear. After a short time, I've bought new 16-300 for Nikon ...