Jsake

I would agree, I think the wider field of view is more versatile and a good option for someone who's just starting out. Trouble is when I was looking around the 35mm options in the crop eco ...

I was recently asked for advice on camera systems for someone who wants to get into nature/wildlife. Budget will be decent, around £2,000. I made some recommendations based on costs for a more ...

wow. that is a very long write up. did my best to stay with it. not sure I've fully understood it though. I've not had chance to shoot a whole lot of V-LOG with my S5, but I have managed to make ...

I don't have the tripod collar for it, so I can't comment on that aspect, aside from to say it looks very neat with just the rubber cover where the collar would go. With my use case I figured I'd ...

No, all hand held, I think when I shot that bit of video I was in a kneeling position so the camera was quite stable. Infact I'd say the unnatural jitter seems more prevalent at the start and end ...

its quite subtle and most noticable toward the end of the clip, seems like the stabilisation kind of twitches. I mean I was at 400mm and its still pretty stable in general. I would have had ...

This weekend I had another opportunity to take the sigma 100-400 out with my S5 and try some more wildlife photography. Unfortunately visibility was absolutely terrible, thick fog and cloud cover, ...

Lol, I actually have the canon EF 50 1.8 too. I also use that with the sigma adapter... Well at least I did before getting the sigma 45mm. Even with the adapter the 50 EF is small and light, ...

I think I'm most looking forward to the lumix 50mm f1.8 as I really like that focal length for creative video, and I'm assuming it would have the same AF reliability in video as the 20-60. I like ...

Panasonic 20-60 f3.5-5.6 I have the panasonic 20-60mm as it came with the S5. .. it's sharp at pretty much all apertures, light weight, weather sealed, focus is silent and fast, on the S5 it even ...

Good Suggestion, hadn't been to that forum yet, but have posted there now

Not the most exotic creatures, but for my first serious attempt at wildlife photography, I'm happy with these two images.

shutter shock? looks like the fine details in the grass and rocks aren't resolved. High shutter speed so motion blur seems unlikely.

There's no way an ISO3200 image on my GH5 would have come out this clean, I've found with the S5 I can set quite a liberal range on the auto ISO and not worry about it.

As far as I know, there is nothing native over 400mm. best hope is probably that sigma create an L version of the 150-600mm as Panasonic do not seem to be prioritising the release of super long ...

Inspired by other users of this forum I decided to up my wildlife photography game with the new sigma L mount 100-400 DG DN. I managed to get outside for about an hour today, not very long, but ...

This... This was the other option I was considering. I've seen the 100-300mm for as low as £350 used. by all accounts the image quality is fine at the long end if you stop down a bit. very ...

Thanks for the sample images. I can see from these that image quality wouldn't be a problem If i did choose to adapt.