Rumle

Rumle

Lives in Denmark Copenhagen, Denmark
Works as a Photojournalist
Has a website at http://www.rumleskafte.com
Joined on Dec 28, 2002

Comments

Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

User3787089555: No leaf shutter? Then it is totally crap.

No cap shutter. Then it's totally leaf

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 19:03 UTC
In reply to:

tiberiousgracchus: house sold !

Car and oldest son up for sale... or rental agreements.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 19:02 UTC
In reply to:

dennis tennis: Had Fuji released this two years ago, we would have rewarded Fuji a "deserving of credit" award but too late Fuji!

Too late for what?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 19:00 UTC
In reply to:

belle100: Will there be a new AF 85mm f1.4 A in the horizon?

out of them all, the only lens that aren't currently in the Art line is the 85mm, so its very likely one will appear in the A line soon

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2016 at 07:58 UTC
On article Lenovo Yoga Book features unique 'on-demand' keyboard (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

FLruckas: This would have been more interesting with two screens and a real operating system.

It has option for android or windows 10

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2016 at 23:32 UTC

incredible :)

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2016 at 18:28 UTC as 42nd comment
In reply to:

sattva: Where is point no. 6 in the features description?

Germans pass the number 6 for good luck.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2016 at 06:53 UTC
In reply to:

Hotahseh: welp looks like im selling my soul for this.

Souls are so damn cheap at the moment. Good luck finding a buyer.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 00:47 UTC
In reply to:

Rumle: So... every one forgot about the Nikon A?

Don't know about Dollars where I'm from, but Nikon A goes for under half of a X70 and it seams to be largely the same specs.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2016 at 11:42 UTC

So... every one forgot about the Nikon A?

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 16:21 UTC as 19th comment | 5 replies

damn, as soon as soon as Sony owns this marked we might see a decline in progression and innovation.. And with this buy they have very little competition.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2015 at 18:02 UTC as 52nd comment | 14 replies

"these are not the six rumored Sony lenses you're looking for"
"...these are not the six rumored Sony lenses I am looking for...
"

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 11:44 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm X100T successor rumored to feature new lens (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

Matt1645f4: or at 18-23-35 f1.8 lens that rotas and locks only in those 3 focal lenghts

okay idea, but would be way to big no matter how you put it, look at the sigme 18-35 1.8 it covers same sensor size, is as big as any other fullframe standard zoom, making it 18-23-35 and not actually a zoom would make no difference in optical formula either

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2015 at 20:59 UTC
In reply to:

lingccp: N24-70 2.8 VR is a big deal! Canon, wake up plz!

Alright maybe the canon is not huge deal better than the nikkor. But saying the should wake up and spam IS all over the place is a little extreme. As I see it the new nikkor is reaching a size that unpractical.. least in my opinion. And VR is mostly to blame for that. Now, before sony started making superb video mirrorless cameras I would have loved a 24-70 with VR. But now that I shoot all video on sony lenses I find i'd rather be without and save on size.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 17:11 UTC
In reply to:

lingccp: N24-70 2.8 VR is a big deal! Canon, wake up plz!

The canon 24-70L II is the best there was so far. The lack of IS in a standard zoom is only real practical for video or in rare cases in normal use.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 07:38 UTC
In reply to:

pkvman13: There is a promo video linked to on photorumors.com of these being used on a A7 series body. Why does all the specs, including on B&H/Adorama listings, plus the images of the lens itself clearly say E-mount?

Yahh well. Sony never been known for logical naming schemes.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 10:13 UTC
In reply to:

Cheng Bao: what's the min focus distance of 85/1.8?

0.8 which is pretty standard. Better than the zf with 1 meter and nikkor 1.4 with 0.85. But most 85 1.8 is about 0.8

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 19:20 UTC
In reply to:

pkvman13: There is a promo video linked to on photorumors.com of these being used on a A7 series body. Why does all the specs, including on B&H/Adorama listings, plus the images of the lens itself clearly say E-mount?

Because it is E mount.. FE is just indication that it is full frame. FE is E mount..

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 19:10 UTC
In reply to:

keith james taylor: I think I will waite for the pro vershion so that i can take better photographs ;)

Plastic of a lazy mold... ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 09:36 UTC
In reply to:

hazwing: Did I just watch and advertisment disguised as a review??

why does it have to be advertisement just because its positive?
I get way more out of watching a video like this than a studio test or random sample images

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2015 at 12:46 UTC
Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »