ttan98

https://www.dwidigitalcameras.com.au/canon-eos-200d-body-only-digital-slr-camera-black-kit-box.html those looking for one may like to get it from here. BTW I am not connected to the company in anyway.

A big difference is focus in LOW LIGHT, I think A7RII is quite bad in this situation(so many owners complain about this), whereas D850 being a DLSR is so much faster.

I quickly read the SL2 manual, I cannot find whether Back Focusing is available on SL2, can anyone confirm this? Thks.

I would bought the Fujifilm X-T20(I own Xpro1 and a few lenses) over the SL2 hands down if not for the Xtrans sensor. Maybe you are aware that the RAW images from XT20's sensor when processed in ...

Finally you pulled the trigger, you got one... Glad you are enjoying it...I may get one too...

In your case SL2 is no brainer....

You have a good point I also own a number of formats/bodies, Sony(A6000), Fujifilm(X-pro1), Olympus(EM-10) and many Canon EF and EF-S lenses. Currently haven't decided which way to go either X-T20 ...

You have talking about it for a long...long time....

Thanks for this info, it's a useful site an alternative to DXOmark.

Hi, Some of you may be aware that there is new revision of Picktorial post processing software that goes with Thomas' film simulations including Chrome and Acros for the older Fuji bodies e.g. Xpro1 ...

You will find it better than the kit lens in most aspects, sharpness, color rendering, etc.

At the asking retail, it must be in the very good category otherwise is money down the drain really. I am not getting it cos the camera body is way better than my abilities at photography.

yes. my mistake.

If you look at DXOmark grading of Sigma 17-50mm the results show a HUGE improvement over the std STM 18-55mm kit lens, in addition the color rendering on this lens is still much better than the ...

You are wrong both Sigma's are superior to the std Canon 18-55mm STM, I have made the comparison myself. Both the Sigmas are marginally superior to the Canon 15-85mm which I also own.

I don't own the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8(I assume) it by all means a very very good lens you really can't wrong with it, however you need to know these limitations: 1. It is on the heavy side, much more ...

Very similar in my way of thinking.

I don't own any Canon SL1 or SL2.

I still own Nex 5N I agree with you. I also own A6000, in terms of image quality under normal conditions (small to medium size print)not  much difference between the 2 bodies.

I own a few mirrorless cameras not all are satisfactory eg difficult to focus in low light. This SL2 seems to be a good alternative because of its weight, size and price, furthermore I own a ...