Dave Seeley

Ken...  thanks for the kudos!...  back acha.  Your site is very impressive indeed. Wow...  so my interest in video is really the result of playing w the M5...w dpaf/touchscreen focus.  It was ...

optimal mount to sensor distance, without adding extra depth to the body.  Same at the M cams.

Yeah....  I disagree...  I actually own two eos ef/m adapters...  all lenses have identical or even better (w dpaf) speed and focus...  it's painless except for adding a little weight and length ...

AND, a canon exec said they thought they had a "sexy" solution for adapting ef...  that could mean increased capability...  zoom, or teleconversion etc?

I haven't held the M50, but own and love the M5...  and true, I'd ideally love the M5ii to have great low/no crop 4K...  then I'd be a happy camper.  The build on the M5 is awesome, and it ...

Didn't know that....  Is that always the case, or only w not so good processors?  Another reason to get a stand along 4K vid cam?  The problem is, I want one that takes ef lenses, and I don't want ...

very exciting!!!   touch and drag autofocus, full frame uncropped 4k video w dpaf....  I'd be in at $4000, but more competitive pricing very welcome indeed.

Different focal lengths, but very useful....  the two ef primes I use all the time on my M5... ef 35 f2.0 is ef 50 f1.8 stm

The ef 24 f2.8 IS is very close in focal range, but has IS.  The M22 has a speed advantage, and it's stm, for silent video...

Assuming you mean that because Canon just released them, that they would not abandon the ef mount? If yes, then I'll say that Canon has said that they have a "sexy" solution to utilizing ef lenses ...

I think that's the way it's going... Seems like the only real objection I hear from dslr peeps is evf. evf's will only get better, and they allow features not possible in ovf... My studio setup is ...

In which case, you won't need to choose between dslr and ml

I actually had this issue w the eos M5... had to double the rule of thumb because of the higher rez on the aps-c sensor..... it's a phenom covered in this article on The Digital Picture... https:// ...

correct, but that is consistent w my point.  The 5dsr is no more prone to motion blur than the 5Div....  the extra resolution of the 5dsr, just allows tiny motion blur to be perceptible.  I don't ...

I have no experience w the 7Dii, but as a crop camera, doesn't it take an fstop hit of 1.6x?  I'd think that would make the 5Dsr ff cam a much better performer in low light...  but perhaps I'm ...

I have to say that I have coveted touch screen since I bought a first gen eos M....  I instantly wanted it on my 5 series bodies.  It was a factor in me "almost" buying the 5Div a few times...  ...

so my understanding of this aspect....  is that w more resolution, tiny motion blur is visible where it would not be at the pixel level of a lower resolution camera where you're getting blur ...

I disagree on both counts, but the first is certainly about what and why you are shooting.  I'm shooting lots of models, and used to shoot headshot separately... but now much less so, as a head ...

My studio (strobes) cam is the 5Dsr... LOVE it. Amazing detail. Used to shoot the 5Diii, but never did buy the 5Div. I've almost pulled the trigger on a 5Div a few times, but entirely for its ...

It was great, and teaming with wildlife... The Hillsborough River northeast of Tampa Florida in the Lower Hillsborough Wilderness https://www.google.com/maps/place/Lower+Hillsborough+Wilderness+Pre ...