PK24X36NOW

An important notion to understand. A blurry image due to camera movement during the shot will look blurry whether at 12MP or 45MP, you just won't be able to (natively) magnify the blur as much on ...

Agree with the second option, that's what I use most frequently. Manual with Auto ISO gives you control over the most important things - shutter speed to stop motion blurring of subject or scene ...

I use the ES-2 with my 55mm f/2.8 Micro Nikkor manual focus. Had to get an extra third party extender ring since Nikon didn't include the 'extra' one needed for that lens (the ES-2 is set up for ...

I'd hate to be on the ferry docking there - looks like it has to ram through the Rock of Gibraltar to get into the slip!

BTW, if your previous camera was the D3S in your equipment list, you don't have "4x the resolution." You actually have a bit less than 2x the resolution. 4x the PIXELS (49.2MP) is needed to ...

Somebody beat you to it. And beat me to it too - four months ago. ;-)

Sorry, but this is a dumb question. I didn't buy an interchangeable lens camera to then confine my "system" to a single "do everything" lens.

Non-sequitur Marty. Sigma bodies of any variety sold few copies, so you can toss that example. The Pentax K-01 didn't have a viewfinder - you had to shoot it like a phone, using the back screen, ...

Yes, I made that "jump" as well (D810 to D850), and now pretty much want for nothing. :-D

I had a Pentax LX (actually two) back in the day, having worked my way up from a K1000 (later two K1000s) then briefly a Super Program. I "dabbled"/experimented with early Pentax DSLRs (the ...

Film to digital was easy; once digital matured some (and became more affordable), it was simply better in many respects than shooting with film, both the results and the range of possibilities. ...

I was experimenting with using 4fps on my D3 while I went back and forth about whether to get a D800 or D800e, really wanted 5fps but started to figure I could make do with 4fps. Then Nikon came ...

In bright Sun, 1/30th at f/11 will be about 4 stops overexposed (1/250 @ f/16, which converts to 1/500 @ f/11 was the exposure for ISO 200 slide films per manufacturer's instructions for bright Sun).

Since I shoot RAW and process my images, even if I had a MILC what I see would never be what I get.

Or made a focusing error on the 24MP test.

In film days I was using 1/250th at first, proved too slow. I went to 1/500th and usually not higher out of necessity (didn't want to go to higher ISO/grainier film, plus higher ISO wasn't ...

Approaching this question from a different angle - if when you speak of "resolution" you mean what DxO Mark calls "Perceptual Megapixels," that is not a measurement. I hated when they moved from ...

Maybe one should ask "How stupid does one need to be to think that ChatGPT is 'smart?'"

And? They're clamoring about "pixel level sharpness." Which is meaningless. Compare two prints of the same image of equal size from the 24MP camera and the 12MP camera, and the 24MP camera image ...

More nonsense. A higher resolution body makes nothing "worse."