Lives in United States Nunyer Dam, United States
Works as a Customer Service
Joined on Nov 7, 2007
About me:

I am a 4/3 and m4/3 survivor selling off my body and appendages to fund a full-frame addiction. Currently shooting with a Canon 6D.


Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8

Maybe Brides Magazine should consider hiring an edditor.

Link | Posted on Dec 31, 2016 at 13:39 UTC as 63rd comment
On article AP cuts ties with Pulitzer-winning photographer (166 comments in total)

Really, fired for that? The removal of that item in no way changes the story being told by the photograph, it just makes the photo more appealing. So it would be ok, if the camera was a little more to the left, to crop it out.. or or using dodge and burn to eliminate would have been ok.. but to remove it digitally is a sin? Bad decision on the part of the AP.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 04:15 UTC as 67th comment | 1 reply
On article Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000 (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

Underdog 3000: I also am confused to the addition of the OM-D and G6. Both excellent cameras in their own regard I am sure.
Both are priced at the original manufacturers suggested retail price.
Where is the deal.
Sometime I think DPR puts out stuff like this just to see if we are following along.

This is not a list of "deals".. it is a list of the writers favorite cameras under $1000.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2013 at 02:51 UTC
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1842 comments in total)

Sooooo... if I am reading all of this correctly, for a one time payment of $19.99, I will get a full working version of Photoshop CC. Because you all know too well that it is going to take some code cracker out there about 15 minutes of effort to post a work around or create a dummy service.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 03:20 UTC as 714th comment
On photo Jenny E-M5 Test in CrashE3's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

frelwa: Great shot. Nice bokeh for f2.2. I think the foreground softness makes the photo more interesting, despite what some say about it.


Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 00:14 UTC

Sure, there are still many users that need CSx. BUT Adobe has, for way too long, benefited from the basic to intermediate photographer that thinks they need it because that is what all of the great photographers have. I am one of those who does a lot of portrait work and just really felt like I needed CS for good retouching and the support of plug-ins that I enjoy using. It is just not the case anymore.. there are way too many options and way too many "plugins" that have come out as stand alone programs. CS3 is the last version I am likely to have bought, as everything that I do to a photo can now be done in my OnOne software suite.. for far less money.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2012 at 14:25 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus launches VF-3 and announces E-PL3 US pricing (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

andrea_g: I wonder if VF3 iworks with XZ1 too. It would be perfect on that small camera!

"The E-PL3 and XZ-1 are virtually the same size not counting whatever lens is attached to the E-PL3." Oh.. and the sensor.. and processing engine, not that those count for anything.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2011 at 12:01 UTC

Ah, thank you for this. It is a logical expansion for you all as many of us like to print some of our own proofs and such.

I have the Canon Pixma MG5220 and was tempted, at the time of purchase, to go with the 8150. Cost was a factor and the 5220 was on sale at the time. I must say though.. wow! The output on the 5220 is already spectacular and I have many photographers asking me where I get my printing done. I can only imagine how much better the 8150 would be.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2011 at 01:14 UTC as 57th comment
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8