PhotoFoxx

That would be the case if Canon didn't already have a camera that's better then the A1 -> the R5, which costs 3000$ less but is better in most specs with a few exception where the A1 has some...

Also own 3 but 100-150? Then something is definitely wrong with your RP or battery. Or you have everything switched on including Wifi and maybe even auto upload etc + Screen on most of the time.

I often heard that but my experience has always been the other way. I can only guess the reason but I would say its the size of the screen compared to the required brightness and illumination while ...

I have been shooting weddings with the RP and usually got around 500-800 images with a single battery. The only time I had such low numbers was with a active Wifi connection to the app and auto ...

Just be careful with the expectations of such upscaling. The "AI" basically just guesses what should/could be there. But you can't magically bring information into an image that just wasn't there. ...

So you compare a completely new system to one we have since many years? Sorry but that makes no sense. Then the e mount would need to be compared with canons EF mount if you want to do a...

I doubt we will ever see that. That patent was signed around 2016. But who knows :)

There are lenses out there with even less than f1. Impossible revers more to "how hard is it to create such a lense, and at what quality and price?"

It took Sony up until now to create such a lens...

Its not impossible. There are even cheap third party lenses out there which achieve even less than f1.0. The problem is in the combination of image quality, sharpness, "flawlessness", like CA, edge...

"Sony has about the best high-end lenses in their GM offering"

Thats Canon you are talking about. Up until now, Sony didn't have comparable lenses. What Sony does have is support from many third...

Those are all available on all R system cameras as I said. Even the RP which I have been using for events and weddings up until I now got the R5. The only thing that the RP didn’t have was a ...

All R system cameras also offer a combination of tracking and point focus which can be enabled in the settings. Once active, instead of Face detection just selecting a face for your (our falling ...

from my personal experience with the RP and the R5 I always felt that with the screens it drained a lot more then when using the EFV.

While this is just my personal opinion, in don’t really see a use case here for this. (Or only a very small one) When you are not using the camera, all screens are off or the camera is in standby. ...

The reason why colors are not good are adobes color profiles. Those are horrible. I have an R5 and an RP and i can say that with adobes profiles the images looks far away from what you see when...

Considering the specs and price, I see the R5 already is Canons competitive camera. The R5 currently is comparable or better in some specs:

- eg 8 Stops IBIS R5 vs 5 Stops Alpha1;
- R5 8k Video...

Renting it is surely the best thing you can do to find out how it works out for you. The RF28-70 is big and heavy. Depending on you shooting style especially for a whole day it can become a ...

Thats a valid point. Thats why it depends on the situation. On the other hand the 70mm will get you more compression of the background which can visually compensate the bokeh difference. In the ...

So I only have the RF28-70 f2, but i initially wanted to get the RF50mm f1.2 and read nearly every comment, discussion and test on both before making a decision ^^ From that perspective, I can say ...

Absolutely, I have been using a EF 50 F1.4 as my main event/wedding lense for a few years until I decided to step up the game. I was at first aiming for the RF50 f1.2 (as it would have been a ...