Lives in United Kingdom South East, United Kingdom
Works as a IT
Joined on Jul 12, 2001
About me:

Reading SF/Fantasy


Total: 381, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

coldcut: Sometimes I wish that more focus were put on work that are documenting positive things. Sure, the world is a harsh place, but we get bombarded with news every day. There are lot of good things to be found too, and somehow I feel that promoting the good should be rewarded, without forgetting those in need.

^ My vote for the Editor's pick

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2016 at 20:44 UTC
In reply to:

matthew saville: I must say, I'm confused as to why she thought she had to time each shot perfectly, with that much firepower. Though I am not a fan of the "spray and pray" method for getting keeper shots, in this particular instance I might have made an exception since there was a limited number of kayakers, and a limited window of time.

It was probably shot at f/2.8 and an extremely high ISO. Even at a great distance, two 600 EX's should be able to push enough light out at 1/128 power (especially zoomed in) to hit at least 10+ FPS for a handful of shots. Or heck, even at 1/64 or 1/32 power you ought to be able to get 2-3 shots off at 10+ FPS.

Yup, I just tested my crappy old Nikon SB80. At 1/128 power it hit 10 FPS for 3+ seconds. (I only stopped because I didn't want to burn my shutter.)

Also, thanks to the awesome Nikon flash interface, I can easily see that even such an old flash (with a lesser GN than a 600 EX RT) can hit ~50 ft when set to f/2.8 and ISO 6400, 105mm flash zoom at 1/128 power.

Apparently she shot the final photo at ISO640, f3.2, 1/250th.

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 20:58 UTC
In reply to:

Lan: Fascinating! I wonder what his contemporary setup would be if he were still alive today?

LOL; some great responses guys!

M1963: Surely you'd want to dodge that one ;)

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 01:00 UTC

Fascinating! I wonder what his contemporary setup would be if he were still alive today?

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2016 at 19:07 UTC as 31st comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

CopCarSS: Now we just need to convince the pixel peepers of DPR to actually go out and take photos (and enjoy the experience) instead of arguing about ISO 51,200 noise comparisons and the dreaded "equivalency" discussions all day long.

CopCarSS: Some pixel peepers clearly enjoy arguing about noise levels and equivalency, otherwise they wouldn't do it... Personally, I enjoy the pixel peeping, but not the endless arguing.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2016 at 20:47 UTC
On article iFixit takes a look inside the Olympus PEN E-PL7 (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

bluevellet: Next, open one of those cameras without visible screws.

That's easy; but putting them back together again is another story ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2016 at 22:21 UTC

Typo, paragraph 1: <95 CRI, should be >95 CRI.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 19:10 UTC as 8th comment
On article DxO OpticsPro 11 brings advanced Raw noise reduction (110 comments in total)

When I follow the link above, I get taken to the download page, but clicking on the link for Trial/OpticsPro/Win just takes me back to the homepage. I am logged into the DxO site though, so that might be the reason. Anyway this link actually works for me:

Be warned though, the file is 440MB!

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 19:48 UTC as 24th comment
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

I think this would have been rather more interesting if it had been compared with a different camera as well - say an A7R? They're roughly comparable in price at the moment.

Based on these samples I'd say pixel shift isn't worth the massive increase in file size.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 22:58 UTC as 75th comment | 1 reply

The detail I'd expected to be picked up on here, but hasn't been so far - is the super-resolution feature. There's a 92MP mode. I'm hoping that, since there's an OIS present, they're doing a pixel shift implementation.

Also, although the screen is only 1920x1080, it is Super AMOLED.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 00:01 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Karroly: " Hi-Res Audio (HRA) that provides up to four-times-better sound quality than CDs"
When evaluating audio signals, I know that one can measure distortion, bandwidth, S/N ratio, dynamic range, channel separation. But quality ? Which unit is it ? MBS (Marketing BullS...) ?

I was thinking MBS too, but apparently the key to HRA systems is support of a non-lossy codec like FLAC. Higher sample rates, and higher sample resolutions also feature - the Zenfone 3 supports 192k/24bit.

Either that or they're referring to the obsolete Intel specification from 2004 ;)

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

SanPedro: They look pretty nice for an 'always with you' camera. Given the processing power that's now in phones, how long before pixel shift technology could be used to improve image quality. Couldn't this be used to effectively increase the size of the sensor?

Most folks are unlikely to use these on a tripod; which is currently required for pixel shift. Also I suspect the size of the pixels might make things tricky too.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2016 at 22:24 UTC

Another great new feature only for CC users. Oh wait, no, I created an action to do this already ;)

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 19:07 UTC as 42nd comment | 1 reply

Executive summary: Centre sharp, but corners soft.

High levels of astigamatism/coma appear to be the reason for the relatively poor showing at the corners; so this is not the lens of choice for astrophotography.

That said the A7R2 is a harsh test for any lens. Based on my experiences on a 5D2, I suspect the Samyang 14mm f2.8 might be a better option, but I haven't tried it on an A7R2...

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 13:45 UTC as 15th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Esign: Macro 45? Maybe, with the LEDs. Greater depth of field than with 100-200 macro lenses. I'm most concerned about distortion, because this lens could be useful as "scanner" of old drawings and other larger documents which I now have to first borrow (it's hard to persuade an archivist) and then take to the copy shop for scanning, and I have to pay $300 anyway.

Oh, it's you that keeps sending me #!%&$£!$ photographs of documents!

Please buy a scanner, you'll never guess what they're really useful for ;)

Link | Posted on May 11, 2016 at 14:02 UTC

I can't believe they didn't include the first digital camera, or the first dSLR, or the most popular digital camera, or...

Instead they included Google Glass, which to date has made no difference to anything, the Fitbit, Nest, and Roku?!

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 01:23 UTC as 30th comment
On a photo in the Canon EOS Rebel T6 real-world sample gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

I do wish Canon would work on their JPEG detail rendering; the colours are pleasing, but at 100% the levels are detail in the JPEGs are (as usual) well below that shown by the RAW files.

When you're targetting the JPEG market, why not make those JPEGs sing? C'mon Canon, you know you can!

Link | Posted on May 2, 2016 at 23:59 UTC as 1st comment

So, take one of the most significant advantages of shooting digital, remove it, and then charge more for the result. Neat!

Leica M-D (Typ 262) owners - if anyone wants one, I can sell you a car - I'll take off the wheels, but since I'm feeling generous I'll only double the price of the car without them ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 22:01 UTC as 225th comment

"Lytro specifically mentioned that different versions of Cinema are planned, some smaller in size"

Which vaguely suggests some might be *larger* in size... Well I guess if you found a Ferrari didn't help ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2016 at 22:03 UTC as 54th comment
On article Miggo wants to 'DSLR your iPhone' with the Pictar grip (135 comments in total)
In reply to:

Simion1: One of the main problems with phones is that they are thin. And because they're thin that means they have tiny sensors, with tiny lenses projecting images onto those tiny sensors. So when I first saw these product pics my first reaction was 'Cool, someone has invented a way to use a bigger sensor with a smartphone'.

But, it turns out all this product does is make the phone bigger? To me it seems like a wasted opportunity where they could have given the phone both more grip and used a bigger sensor/lens at the same time, which really would solve a problem.

It seems like a wasted opportunity to me too; but if you want a better camera for an iPhone, get a DxO One!

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2016 at 17:34 UTC
Total: 381, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »