Peak freak

I think one of the significant advantages of a camera like this is attaching something like the PZ 16-35/4 (at only 353g) and having an effective (and suitably high quality) zoom range of (approx)...

@Vignes: There was something about it in DPR news, but this was the first thing I came up with:...

I think the Sony E mount has proven that users can have their cake and eat it too.
You want the best performing lenses - use Sony. You want 'good' performing lenses - at half the expense - try...

The problem I have is that these are not photographs of the landscape as the competition clearly implies. They are imagined, created, manipulated images of the landscape and very effective as such...

Tamron make the 17-70/2.8 for Sony and Fuji crop bodies. Heavyish at 525g but sharp, constant aperture and IS. The obvious problem is Canon don't want Tamron (et al) making RF lenses. The less ...

Yes, very nice camera(s), but (even as a Canon user) I much prefer Sony's 'open source' lens strategy.

Good to know, thanks for the ‘review’.

I have tried several copies of the 24-105/4 trying to get a good example - I currently own two(!) and both have issues. I have found that it performs very well when focused at infinity, but when ...

Yes, Canon RF lenses are a lot of money here in NZ too. I hike a lot so the weight and size of an adapted 16-35/4 is a nuisance, but I live with it because the results are so consistently good. ...

Another in support of the EF 16-35/4 adapted to the EOS R. This lens is so good it is the reason I stuck with Canon and decided to get an EOS R. I haven't been disappointed (not overly impressed by ...

@Myles Baker: You're right, and this where I think Canon have it wrong - Camera IQ is broadly similar, and the difference will be the glass you stick on the front of it, and Canon, for various...

Couldn't agree more, but highly doubt they will.
I've been trying for years to have an 'acceptable quality' lightweight EF-S alternative kit to my FF kit, but inevitably have stuck with my FF...

As someone who has used Canon FF and crop for years, 'quality' EF-S lens choice has always been something of a problem.
Now, as an EOS R user, I really like the look of the R10 (and its files), But...

I wonder how much camera module damage is being done in the meantime...

Yes, some people will like it, but the photo snob in me just can't cope with the staging of the dam shot. A shame, because I otherwise see the potential of a good photo.

As someone who (also) likes to use a 'camera' to take photos, the new iPhones (and similar) don't really interest me either, except... for some reason I find video with my 'camera' something of a...

The disappointing thing is not knowing if Canon plans to produce 'good' quality lenses for its RF-S line.
I've long combined the use of Canon FF and crop bodies, but inevitably have to use my L...

No. 6 (solar wind power) is a clear standout for me - could win any number of competitions. At a 2 sec. exposure, it is close enough to what a person might actually observe unaided. Somewhat unique...

@MikeRan: fair point, just as a canon RF user I’m feeling there are better lens options for me elsewhere (I’ve had several copies of an rf 24-105/4. They have weird oof blurring. Kinda put me off...

I believe the new PZ 16-35/4 is uniquely small, light and sharp for an UWA zoom.

Also, thanks to those pointing out that Sony (and Tamron etc) lenses adapt to Nikon, a big deal compared to...