Jefftan

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 573, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Jefftan: in my opinion any FL narrower than 30mm equivalent not suitable for landscape
24-25mm equivalent is ideal
300mm barely OK for landscape

I am talking about if u use a prime lens like this article mention
All reply miss my point,
if for zoom lens than something start with 24mm and the longer the better (example lumix 12-60mm 24-120mm equivalent)
I still believe when travel many times u need to run and gun, and 24mm equivalent most easy to just get the shot (can crop later if u needed)

"any FL narrower than 30mm equivalent not suitable for landscape
24-25mm equivalent is ideal"

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2017 at 05:14 UTC

in my opinion any FL narrower than 30mm equivalent not suitable for landscape
24-25mm equivalent is ideal
300mm barely OK for landscape

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 15:29 UTC as 114th comment | 6 replies

should revisit the K-01 mirrorless
DSLR is outdated technology

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 02:52 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply

The example shown above show advantage pretty minor compare with ACR
maybe there are setting that would make a bigger difference

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 11:53 UTC as 17th comment | 8 replies

Make a big sensor waterproof camera please
i am sure there is huge demand

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 05:20 UTC as 16th comment

These adapter won't work with EF-S lens as far as I know
They are for full frame EF lens

any EF-S to E adapter for Sony APS-C camera

Thanks

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 04:15 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
On article Feisty upstart: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T20 (356 comments in total)

without weather sealing, in body IS this is surely not a pro camera
for a consumer level camera, $900 without lens is quite expensive

not just Fuji, every company is testing what is the upper limit market will bear
i think they all will learn in the hard way

consumer (non-pro) level is a $600 market
any above (especially significantly above) won't sell

If u get to pro level (with weather seal, in body IS) than higher price may be relatively OK
but still don't expect to sell in high number
and there are not many pro, there are many consumer

and at most $600 is what they will paid

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 12:37 UTC as 56th comment | 6 replies
On article Feisty upstart: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T20 (356 comments in total)
In reply to:

kobakokh: Great camera, great sensor, great 18-55 lens. I am not a fan of Fujifilm, but anyway, really great camera in normal price. Just little overprices... X-T2 is very overpriced camera...

u can dream whatever u like
truth is Fuji sales is very low
in Japan not in top 3 mirrorless

which mean sales is extremely low
if X-T2 really like u said, than production very low
not because of it is a hot seller

no way a $1700 APS-C camera can be a hot seller
same as A6500
even $1000 A6300 can't be hot seller

hot seller is around $600
that's why Olympus and Canon is #1 and #2
their mirrorless is $600 range

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 12:33 UTC

Also all brand has don't know what reason creep up the weight
no weather seal and weight get to 383 gram

how much heavier than XT10?
why do that? Anyone really like heavy?
If there is such person would use heavy DSLR

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:07 UTC as 18th comment | 3 replies

Fuji, How about something really exciting
like a waterproof large sensor (at least 1 inch, the larger the better) camera

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:06 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

SiberiaWolf: A 2017 camera that costs around 1k, without IBIS - that might be deal breaker...

If one can accept 16MP and smaller micro four third sensor
EM10, EM5, GX85 , g80 is very attractive price

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:04 UTC
In reply to:

Drive: The pricing is surprisingly reasonable.

I really don't see how reasonable that is
without weather sealing cost $1200
and that is reasonable?
even $1000 matching A6300 (which is overpriced) is not reasonable

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:01 UTC

no weather sealing $1200
what? Are u serious?

Company are not realistic with price
no wonder Canon mirrorless become #2 in Japan
Canon at least get the pricing right

Olympus #1 because it still have reasonably priced E-PL7/8 and EM10
If they follow E-M1 II crazy pricing, see what happen

Sony #3 thanks to those crazy A6300 pricing again, who know how low is Fuji sales

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 11:00 UTC as 20th comment | 7 replies

anyone can explain why 45-175mm only 210 gram

suddenly 45-200 mm just 25mm more (50mm more in equivalent FL) become 380 gram!

both f 4-5.6 and actually the lighter one get power OIS and the heavier one only got mega OIS (before get updated now)
the 45-175mm base on weight is the better lens yet not get updated

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 21:45 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article A comfortable fit: Panasonic Lumix GX850 overview (119 comments in total)

using micro sd is stupid
with 4k, high capacity , high speed card very expensive compare with SD

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 20:35 UTC as 37th comment | 2 replies

is the old 12-60mm weather seal?

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 19:07 UTC as 27th comment | 9 replies

For the weight and price , this a very tempting camera

As a Sony APS-C big sensor user, I won't buy a 1 inch small sensor camera unless
it is cheap and lightweight

that is it, maybe this will be my first 1 inch camera

last generation, I already want to buy but stopped by its DXO score lower than other 1 inch camera
Anyone know why? last generation not using BSI 1 inch sensor?

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 17:15 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Mariano Pacifico: Cellphone cameras has better technology than big boys Cameras. Cellphone cameras are also upfront with their technologies. They do not give it to us in incremental steps.

Eventually Nikon and Canon will be bought by cellphone companies

tired of this bull
where is the 28-84 F2-4.9 lens in phone

and where is the dual IS and Raw burst 8.2 fps

and most important where is the 1 inch sensor that is many times larger (5 times?)

u don't care, I am sure there are people care to use instead of phone especially at 200 gram

I will use for sure

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 17:11 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: This is what camera should be
at this size and weight if camera still want a fight with smartphone

most people would not use all those heavy DSLR and mirrorless camera
or at least won't take them out and use with them everyday
even if u give them one for free

among the 1 inch, i think this one for its size
and Panasonic 25-250 10 times zoom most useful and interesting

I may actually buy to use with my A6500 with 10-18mm lens (15-27mm equivalent)
This 28 mm start where the lens left off and weight nothing

As the lightest 1 inch, very useful, why negative comments, I don't understand

What concern me is the last generation , DXO score somehow lower than other 1 inch for unknown reason. (maybe last time they don't use BSI, but this time it is BSI)
If not because of this, I have already buy. Hope this is now change

no smartphone can never have this zoom lens

there must be some who care and if lightweight would use instead of phone

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 16:55 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: Has Canon design a waterproof housing for it? anyone know
thanks

G7X II one work for G9X II?
or not? Thanks

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 16:50 UTC
Total: 573, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »