Jefftan

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 575, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

DenWil: Elements 15 was 39$ and the free ACR update took a few minutes- didn't even need to sign in.
There are options depending on what you need.

Thanks for reply
That means if I have thousands of RAW to convert to jpeg from a trip and don 't have time to individual adjust
$60 Photoshop Elements can use latest Adobe Camera Raw to do it for me

That's really good news if true.
Thanks

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 13:21 UTC
In reply to:

NAwlins Contrarian: Lightroom 6.9 is also out, for those of you (like me) who refuse to go the subscription route. I downloaded and installed the update an hour or so ago. Now if I just has a GFX 50S on hand to test it with ...

what's the difference between standalone Lightroom and Photoshop elements
Thanks

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 11:07 UTC
In reply to:

DenWil: Elements 15 was 39$ and the free ACR update took a few minutes- didn't even need to sign in.
There are options depending on what you need.

$60 in amazon
have batch processing of RAW?
difference with Lightroom?

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 11:05 UTC

Can be used by standalone version of Lightroom?

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2017 at 11:03 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies

My guess is Nikon 1 may not be dead after all
and that is a good thing

look at the 180 gram 80-300mm equivalent lens
that alone should justify the the Nikon 1 system

There is a place for 1 inch sensor if u look at the IQ of newest RX 100
not everyone like heavy camera, especially in Asia huge demand for small camera

If Nikon 1 is dead it is a real shame but I think it is not dead

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 UTC as 120th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

sh10453: It's a good developer once you have learned it.
Strange Interface, and a relatively long learning curve.

How to learn?
video? English tutorial?

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 17:51 UTC
In reply to:

Robert Schroeder: I'm using Silkypix since the Olympus E-510, which, with its much-lacking JPEG engine, more or less forced me to completely switch to Raw from mostly using of out-of-camera JPEG. Silkypix, the makers of which have contributed to Olympus' own software, too, turned out to deliver final images which I liked more than those of other converters with regard to colors and tonality. (With the older Olympus E-300, other available third-party converters couldn't even produce clean red color, they delivered orange instead...) And the results always came out much like the pre-E-510 JPEGs I had come to like. It was always easy to get similarly-looking images when shooting with very different cameras in parallel, too.

Since then, Silkypix has much improved in many regards. Perhaps most importantly, noise reduction was continually improved.

They still should hire a native English speaker, though, to brush up the language, whether it's inside the software or the texts on it...

That must be a very good thing if u like the color produce by the program

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 17:49 UTC
In reply to:

Robert Schroeder: I'm using Silkypix since the Olympus E-510, which, with its much-lacking JPEG engine, more or less forced me to completely switch to Raw from mostly using of out-of-camera JPEG. Silkypix, the makers of which have contributed to Olympus' own software, too, turned out to deliver final images which I liked more than those of other converters with regard to colors and tonality. (With the older Olympus E-300, other available third-party converters couldn't even produce clean red color, they delivered orange instead...) And the results always came out much like the pre-E-510 JPEGs I had come to like. It was always easy to get similarly-looking images when shooting with very different cameras in parallel, too.

Since then, Silkypix has much improved in many regards. Perhaps most importantly, noise reduction was continually improved.

They still should hire a native English speaker, though, to brush up the language, whether it's inside the software or the texts on it...

"It was always easy to get similarly-looking images when shooting with very different cameras in parallel"

What is that mean?
U mean jpeg from different camera RAW file got the same color? Thanks

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 15:26 UTC
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)

Really how many shoot 4k video even if the camera have it
anything not 10-30 second short clip and one get huge file size

even if shoot 4k, What I know is most use software to downsample to 1080p to save space
Of course downsample 1080p from 4k is better than native 1080p

Also most computer monitor are not 4k , 4k TV is common now but how to watch 4k video on 4k TV is a challenge
Anyone know how?

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:50 UTC as 67th comment | 6 replies
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: What M system need is lens like 22mm F2 not camera

but I like M6 343 gram weight , M5 too heavy
This should be a $600 camera not $900

Yes that's why I said it need more this pancake type of lens
The 22mm F2 is system seller but unfortunately only one

At least i want a wide angle one, 35mm equivalent not wide angle

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:46 UTC
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

scotthunter: Will this camera be weather-sealed like the A6300?

A6300 and A6500 said to be weather seal
first any e-mount lens weather seal? I don't know any

Well maybe Sony said all e-mount lens weather seal but just like camera
u trust it to use under heavy rain like Olympus camera

Olympus real weather seal, I won't tust Sony even for light rain

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:43 UTC
In reply to:

Ken Aisin: I have been using Lightroom since version 1.0 to 6.8 now. Thinking that Adobe probably won't release a standalone 7.0, I have tried several alternatives. Unlike Capture One, I find RawTherapee really easy to use. I pretty much got the hang of it within minutes. And unlike DXO, it is not sluggish at all. I find it very snappy on my PC. So far, I don't know what's not to like. Best of all, it's free of charge!! Really want to thank the developers.

C1 $300 price is way overpriced

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:37 UTC

I have heard RT can read data from RAW and correct MFT lens distortion, correct?

any others like Sony E-mount got automatic lens correction?
Thanks

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:35 UTC as 13th comment | 6 replies
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)

Add in the cost of EVF it is more expensive than M5
if one need EVF not a good value option

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:18 UTC as 68th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)

It need a ultra wide that go 15mm not the current 18mm for the M system
Very important to a lot of people

15mm and 18mm big difference

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:15 UTC as 70th comment | 5 replies
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)

What M system need is lens like 22mm F2 not camera

but I like M6 343 gram weight , M5 too heavy
This should be a $600 camera not $900

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 13:15 UTC as 71st comment | 4 replies
On article Grab a free copy of DxO OpticsPro 9 while you can (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Uniqumm: I think I'm missing something ........
Where/How does one get the software, or are you supposed to just stick the license onto the wall?

if u use gmail like me, it put DXO mail into spam and under "promotion"
have to pull it out from "spam"

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2017 at 09:55 UTC
On article Grab a free copy of DxO OpticsPro 9 while you can (187 comments in total)

I can't believe DXO is giving out DXO Prime for free
Although it only work on old camera but this is the best NR of all program
for free !!

Amazing deal, anyone not take advantage is just missing out

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 15:50 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
On article Grab a free copy of DxO OpticsPro 9 while you can (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: I wonder how many stick with lightroom just because don't want to learn a new software
I don't know if Lightroom really that good or not but I like DXO

even if u are using kit lens, it would improve IQ by lens profile
and don't have to fear it would go subscription only like

"Lightroom catalog is very easy to use."

Catalog, does it occupy space on hard drive?
what if I move the files? the catalog change automatically?
I suppose catalog don't duplicate pics and waste hard drive space, correct?

Thanks for help

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 15:27 UTC
On article Grab a free copy of DxO OpticsPro 9 while you can (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jefftan: I wonder how many stick with lightroom just because don't want to learn a new software
I don't know if Lightroom really that good or not but I like DXO

even if u are using kit lens, it would improve IQ by lens profile
and don't have to fear it would go subscription only like

By the way, i still don't figure out the catalog of lightroom
I haven't really try hard but it don't seem as easy as DXO
Capture one also don't seem to be as easy, again I haven't try hard

I like DXO Opticspro

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2017 at 07:33 UTC
Total: 575, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »