Jefftan

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 348, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with new Panasonic lenses and ZS100 (99 comments in total)

210 gram is too heavy for a MFT slow lens
$500 is too expensive, fair price is at most $300

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 10:14 UTC as 13th comment | 11 replies
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1068 comments in total)

Is there a AA filter in Pen-F?
Anyone know?

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 01:06 UTC as 100th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Steve Photographer: Always nice to hear of MFT lens additions. But what I really need from panasonic is a fast aperture, wide prime that is image stabilised. 12mm or 10.5mm would be great. Image stabilisation in this type of lens would not only allow handheld stills in lower light (or lower ISO), while also permitting indoor video on the hoof - without the faf of a rig. Of course IBIS is the holy grail but this isn't available in Panasonic cameras yet, at least for 4K shooting.

panasonic should make a 11mm or 12mm F1.7 lens

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 12:09 UTC

why not buy 14-140mm, similar weight and similar size, 10x zoom

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 04:43 UTC as 57th comment | 4 replies

what is the difference between this and metabones?

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 03:37 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply

why don't make the 18-50mm lens available for the Nikon 1 system?

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 03:01 UTC as 36th comment | 11 replies

what is the sensor size ? 1/2.3?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 07:46 UTC as 30th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Jefftan: I have heard that the lens especially at wide angle is soft
is that true?

for a fix lens camera if the lens is soft, there really is no reason buying it

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 07:05 UTC

I have heard that the lens especially at wide angle is soft
is that true?

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 02:52 UTC as 27th comment | 7 replies

to me Sony added 4K to A6000 and double the price
Are u serious, Sony?

I am going to replace my aging NEX-5N with either the original A6000 or A7
both excellent value. I think I would choose A7

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 18:12 UTC as 266th comment | 4 replies

Is this a BSI sensor?

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 23:10 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply

For same sensor size if I have to choose
1 stop faster lens but 3 times zoom
or 10 times zoom but 1 stop slower lens

I would of course choose 10 times zoom
surprise it take so long for a 10x zoom 1 inch sensor camera

Panasonic finally nail it this time. Now it has no competitors
The only such product in the market

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:59 UTC as 16th comment

This is what LX camera should be
LX camera should always be a pocket camera
That LX100 camera concept is wrong. No wonder it don't sell well

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:56 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

mosc: I was super excited!

Maximum aperture F2.8 - F5.9

And then I wasn't

:(

I am super excited
this is the first time a pocket size mega zoom with a big 1 inch sensor!
and 4K video

what's wrong with F2.8 sensor? This is not a low light camera.
But even if someone have to take pics at low light, F2.8 is still OK

this is a ground breaking product!

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:51 UTC

$450 4k video!
amazing

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:26 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply

Most interesting product from all company thus far
surprising it takes so long for the 1 inch sensor to be put in a super zoom
10X zoom much more useful than other large aperture 1 inch sensor camera

Price is high but it probably would fall to $500 eventually
I will buy, good product

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 22:19 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply

can u get the same result by pushing RAW
i mean brighten up shadow and darken hightligh

I guess not as good as real HDR like this app

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 19:27 UTC as 4th comment

the first pic ,A great American tradition
is very bad even for small sensor,no detail at all
why? F8 diffraction?

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2015 at 04:47 UTC as 28th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Frank C.: 35mm...
too wide for portraits
too narrow for landscapes
the no man's land of focal lengths
what is there to like??

I agree with Frank C.
35mm is useless
28mm at least,24mm better
u can turn 24/28mm into 35mm by digital zoom but not otherwise

Link | Posted on Dec 26, 2015 at 16:27 UTC
Total: 348, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »