Jefftan

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 1433, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1789 comments in total)
In reply to:

teddoman: Wow, so is this the first camera to offer smaller H.265 files since the 2014 Samsung NX1?

video pirates are still mostly encoding in h264.

why, for file size alone should change
maybe they don't have computer able to encode h.265

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2018 at 21:56 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1789 comments in total)
In reply to:

racunseen: Where is Sony a6700?

wait till feb 2019
XT-3 send it back to drawing board

i am not interested in buying but i want to know how much Sony will charge it
rx100 vi price shocking

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2018 at 21:52 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1789 comments in total)
In reply to:

supersargas: "since in-lens stabilization can't provide effective correction for video shooting."
Elaborate, please?

any maker say Canon do OIS better than others

i somehow think so, correct?

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2018 at 21:51 UTC

should ask if any new lens planned for crop sensor like 16mm f1.4

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2018 at 20:59 UTC as 54th comment

mean mft not dear but DSLR is dying

I don't know, and I might not be the best person to comment, but I've seen many journalists using M4/3 system cameras here in Photokina. In my opinion, M4/3 is a great system if you need compactness.

Within three or four years I expect our mirrorless mount lens sales to be much bigger than for DSLR. Maybe 70% to 30%.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2018 at 20:58 UTC as 55th comment
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1789 comments in total)

is the sensor as rumor made by Samsung and not Sony

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2018 at 15:09 UTC as 52nd comment | 6 replies
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1789 comments in total)

what about the worms
i won't buy xtrans

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2018 at 15:09 UTC as 53rd comment | 10 replies
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

i will try
PRIME is supposed to be the best NR available but is already slow
even slower? maybe not useful

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2018 at 02:00 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

PhotoNinja NR as good as PRIME?
doubt it

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 22:27 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

Download Photo Ninja 1.3.6
Released: June 26, 2018
Latest pre-release: 1.3.7 (Oct 3, 2018)

oops, look like developing again, but same as PRIME?
who said that?

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 15:49 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

PictureCode's PhotoNinja software clearly uses the same NR system as DXO Prime

really, where do u get that? have a link
isn't PhotoNinja now is not actively develop anymore?

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 15:48 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

u don't know DXO PRIME?
best NR possible, my A6500 can use ISO 12800 with it
fuji not support by DXO is big negative

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 15:46 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben Herrmann: The colors are nice and rich - typical Fuji. However, many of us have become accustomed to having a good IS system of some sort (either IBIS or lens-based). As a result - in particular with my getting older - I need IS. If this XF10 had it, I'd jump on it immediately, however, with the Ricoh GR III on the horizon, I will wait for that model. Soooo many choices now-a-days that it can become quite frustrating to be sure.

Ricoh GR III likely double price
for the price xf10 excellent for casual use

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 14:24 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Darkerlight: I am a fan of this type of camera but for me they don't look better than a phone. I really think this camera needs a better lens and like all camera manufactures it needs better software. Many Phones have now a really good HDR implementation. I want that too but in RAW. I know many people say this is cooked RAW but I don't care. ;-)

Many Phones have now a really good HDR implementation

really? which one?
look fake to my eye
if i use camera RAW i tone with software exactly right to me and not decided by a phone

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 14:21 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: The visible dynamic range of the jpgs is very poor. Dpreview, you need to take more photos in DR400 mode, only then the Fujifilm could have a slight chance compared with phones like the iPhone Xs or a Google phone.

with PRIME i use up to ISO 12800
but fuji don't have PRIME

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 14:13 UTC
On article Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery (205 comments in total)

lens may bot be perfect but sony APS-C sensor capture of light and color tone is miles ahead of 1 inch or even MFT especially those old 16mp sensor

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 14:11 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: Sony have animals eye-AF while canikon struggles to deliver human eye-AF lol, mind the gap 😂😂😂

easy to proof
see no company can survive FF alone without crop

even small profit, add up the units is huge

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2018 at 07:04 UTC
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: Sony have animals eye-AF while canikon struggles to deliver human eye-AF lol, mind the gap 😂😂😂

Truth is FF is where profit is
crop is where sales number/unit is, cheap so not much profit

A6000 for example can't have much profit, bet it sell lots more than FF

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2018 at 07:02 UTC

As with past lenses

please tell me what is past lens for E
Thanks

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2018 at 06:29 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

LessMirrored19: Sony have animals eye-AF while canikon struggles to deliver human eye-AF lol, mind the gap 😂😂😂

isn't human just a type of ape?
must work on ape and monkey now

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2018 at 06:22 UTC
Total: 1433, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »