Michael J Davis

Michael J Davis

Lives in United Kingdom Rochdale, United Kingdom
Works as a Retired
Has a website at www.trustsof.co.uk
Joined on Mar 28, 2007

Comments

Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »

No one has queried what they did between 1917 to 1948 - something they don't wish to celebrate, perhaps?

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 11:59 UTC as 38th comment | 1 reply

Well - OK, but why have pictures based on the camera mount? When do we have "Best pictures taken with a tripod"?

It's not the equipment - it's the image that matters!

(For me the best of the set was the Lavender harvest.)

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 10:05 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

Interesting idea - but why doesn't the video show:-
a) How it goes together (isn't that the DIY point?)
b) Any results from the combination
c) what the dissembled bits look like, rather than alternative wood finishes.

I can do slow motion pretend picture taking with my existing cameras!! :-(

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 11:16 UTC as 16th comment

Interesting! I presented it with a cross-section of my 'better' & 'worse' pictures. Nature shots came significantly low, architectural very high (over 99%) and 'pretty girls' around 50% - intriguing!

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2017 at 18:10 UTC as 98th comment
On article 2017 Roundup: Interchangeable Lens Cameras around $500 (348 comments in total)

How come we have six month old comments to a review that was only published yesterday?

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 12:06 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On article 2017 Roundup: Interchangeable Lens Cameras around $500 (348 comments in total)

Since these are interchangeable lens cameras, I think some reference to lens availability is called for. eg what lenses are available for the little Nikon compared with, say, the big one?

Link | Posted on Nov 22, 2016 at 11:59 UTC as 40th comment

Lovely - my sort of photos!
But why do you call "gasholders" - "gasometers" ? - it has nothing to do with metering!

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2016 at 10:45 UTC as 38th comment | 10 replies

In my days of using Leicas - from the IIIc to the M3 - I took pride in knowing that each was a 'special edition' checked and tested by hand. "Special Editions" were made to give away, to people like Queen Elizabeth (in 1958) and other world leaders and influential people.
Financially they have been struggling for many years (and through changes of ownership) I just hope they get their wagon back on track.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2016 at 12:04 UTC as 74th comment | 1 reply
On article Opinion: Park vandals need to be stopped (334 comments in total)

No doubt, had it fallen on them and injured one or more, they'd have sued the Parks Service. What are the laws governing the use of NPs?

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2016 at 11:44 UTC as 64th comment

When I sold my Leica gear in 1998, I bought an Olympus mju-II as an attempt to get back to basics (my previous 'pocket camera was an Oly 35RC).

It drove me mad! The lens was brilliant and I could get 30" prints in sunlight, but...

1) The auto flash was always on and was fiddly to turn off - and after that one shot it was on again,

2) the auto focus seemed to be IR or something, so focussing through glass was impossible

3) There was no way of turning off the power auto-rewind, so on occasions when I was shooting quietly (the shutter was even quieter than my M3) at, say, a church service, the film motor would cut in, and there was nothing I could do to silence the b****r! Embarrassment all round!

I still have my 35RC though, and even have an Oly digital camera.

But no - nice design, but not a camera I ever warmed to. Thank heaven I went digital soon after that!

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2016 at 16:42 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: I hope it works better than the content aware fills on the LR panorama tool. (The pano tool works fine - just that the edges seem to get filled randomly!)

I think I goofed - sorry if I misled anyone. I was thinking of ICE where the edges are not always filled with content aware. (I had been comparing the two panorama techniques - LR doesn't have CA.) Apologies!

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 21:31 UTC

I hope it works better than the content aware fills on the LR panorama tool. (The pano tool works fine - just that the edges seem to get filled randomly!)

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 10:49 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies

If everyone here read this brilliant article (which applies to pretty well all industries in general) then around half of the forum discussions would die off; those that argue whether x-lens is better or worse than y-lens!

The only thing that needs emphasizing (it was mentioned) is the role of the marketing chain in recognising and getting feedback to the manufacturer. Sales people are sometimes unable to cope with the idea of variation, it's bad for their egos! :-(

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 12:03 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies
On photo 3369933 copy in the Post Processing Skill challenge - Moon Surface challenge (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: but it's upside down!! :-(

For those who didn't get my comment; if the moon is llit from above - the sun is even higher in the sky - and guess what - that means it's daylight, not the night sky, oh what the hell ... mutter... mutter... !

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2016 at 22:21 UTC
On photo 3369933 copy in the Post Processing Skill challenge - Moon Surface challenge (19 comments in total)

but it's upside down!! :-(

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2016 at 11:36 UTC as 8th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

Flashback: The lady, the ducks and the tram, rather a good photo:)

I liked it too! But the goose (not duck) poo was the sharpest part!! :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 11:25 UTC
On article Happy Holidays from dpreview! (118 comments in total)

Thank you for the work you put in across the whole photographic range.

But for now, a merry Christmas to all the staff - who feel like old friends to me (ever since I bought my first digicam - Fuji 6900Z on the basis of your review)!

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2015 at 11:13 UTC as 58th comment
On article Erez Marom: On the importance of naming images (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: As an qualified judge on our local Photographic circuit (North-West England) I often comment on the titles given by photographers. Usually, because the title often refers to something that isn't in the picture. Often because the title is in conflict with what the author wants me to see.

I want a simple title that adds to what the author intends me to see; not some clever cultural reference (modern or classical) that could easily go over my or another viewer's head.

If the picture is "worth a thousand words" just help me with some background information.

Personally, I like simple abstract nouns if I'm not required to give geographical references.

But you made some good points, even if some are, IMHO, a bit clever!

Mike

I meant to type 'unqualified' - i.e. I have no formal 'qualifications' (except 60 years of photography!) There are courses run by the regional admin & invitations are offered to those who show promise. Then there is feedback from clubs on the judges.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2015 at 22:47 UTC
On article Erez Marom: On the importance of naming images (107 comments in total)

As an qualified judge on our local Photographic circuit (North-West England) I often comment on the titles given by photographers. Usually, because the title often refers to something that isn't in the picture. Often because the title is in conflict with what the author wants me to see.

I want a simple title that adds to what the author intends me to see; not some clever cultural reference (modern or classical) that could easily go over my or another viewer's head.

If the picture is "worth a thousand words" just help me with some background information.

Personally, I like simple abstract nouns if I'm not required to give geographical references.

But you made some good points, even if some are, IMHO, a bit clever!

Mike

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2015 at 17:19 UTC as 27th comment | 3 replies
On article Video: Summing up our Fujifilm X-T10 Review (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: Dan's introduction made it sound as though this 'type' of camera was 'new' - with no reference to Panasonic and Olympus or even Fuji predecessors. Otherwise why explain that the evf isn't a DSLR? and that a flip out screen can be quite useful? (Oh yes, 'quite' in British English means something different from 'quite' in US English - best avoid it in an international forum.)

Also in such a short review does the reference to film styles really have any place?

Nice camera sure, but I'm not sure that the summary mentioned its stongest points...

'quite' in UK English means 'reasonably' whereas in the US it means 'very'. So if your boss says 'your work is quite good' in the UK, it implies 'you could do better'; but in the US it's a high compliment!

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2015 at 20:41 UTC
Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »