moga

Joined on Sep 17, 2014

Comments

Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Anadrol: This company was shady from the start...
... a car accident happened to the CEO ?? Really ??
They took people for idiots from start to end.

^^^ This!

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2018 at 19:59 UTC
In reply to:

NemanRa: Still can't match the resolution of large format film :)

Mescalamba

Yes, color accuracy isn't averything. Actually, I now allways use VSCO presets in Lightroom and also in RawTherapee CLUTs, but when you have a painting or a manuscript, you'll want to get the most accurate colors. And accurate colors are based on algoritms. The most accurate colors I get from RawTherapee. Lightroom tend to shift hues in their algoritms. Sometimes I just need to see color as they really were and most of the times I use a film simullation preset. For example Kodak Gold 100+ or Fuji 400H. I would really like to shoot film, but medium format, like Contax 645... with fuji 400h or portra 400.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2018 at 02:15 UTC
In reply to:

NemanRa: Still can't match the resolution of large format film :)

TecPan is BW film. Only if done with three R G B exposures, scanned and combined. Color shift will occur for sure... This technique was used in astrophotography before CCD chips.
http://www.rickthurmond.com/Astrophotos/

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 18:32 UTC

K1? No one?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 18:15 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

NemanRa: Still can't match the resolution of large format film :)

True, but film doesn't give color acuracy at the level of digital sensors. Scanning digital backs are also availabe with even higher resolution. Today I have found on G-sense CMOS sensor builder site that they have a 32000 by 8 pixel sensor.
Some scanning backs:
http://www.betterlight.com/
http://www.rencay.com/en/rencay-products/products-rencay-scanbacks/

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 18:00 UTC
In reply to:

seloo: Yet again we won't see a lot of shadow detail and dynamic range in photographs then. Could those be classed as photographs still?

If you know what to look for in DxOmark scores you can have an idea about what a sensor could bring in a photograph.
#PredatorsPrey : Yes, but there aretwo kinds of scores, print and screen.
Also as entoman stated, there are other factors that govern the suitability of a camera, name the ergonomics, which 5D IV have plenty of. Thats why so many wedding photographers are using canon...

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2018 at 00:15 UTC
In reply to:

Lil g: Who makes the lights?

Manfrotto

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2017 at 18:25 UTC
In reply to:

seloo: Yet again we won't see a lot of shadow detail and dynamic range in photographs then. Could those be classed as photographs still?

By the way, there are landscape photographers that uses Fujifilms xtrans corp cameras and do amazing job!

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2017 at 04:29 UTC
In reply to:

seloo: Yet again we won't see a lot of shadow detail and dynamic range in photographs then. Could those be classed as photographs still?

As a mater of facts, Canon 5D mark IV has some serious shadow details. Not at the same leves as d810/850 or A7RII/III, but by ISO 400 up it's in the same league. Of course, a canon user can buy a A7rIII just for landscapes, but for event and portrait 5D IV is everything I need.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2017 at 04:18 UTC
On article Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM real-world sample gallery (129 comments in total)

This copy of lens has clearly litle centering defects... They can be seen at http://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/3367774683
http://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/3367774683

Link | Posted on Nov 25, 2015 at 09:11 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Temporel: Why no Sony e-mount ?

and they would be much longer for e mount, just like using an adapter

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 12:22 UTC
On article Corel releases ParticleShop brush plugin for Photoshop (84 comments in total)
In reply to:

austin55: Since I have installed Windows 10 Pro upgrade, I have had absolutely -0- issues with the OS or with any software compatibility issues. I am about a week in... so far so good:) Everything seems snappier to open and my machine does not seem to be taxed at all. I use LRCC 2015 and PSCC 2015 daily.

I have installed windows 10 update too, but when I work in develop mode and listen to youtube, I have lags in listening. This didn't happened with W. 8.1. I have a good system...

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2015 at 07:51 UTC
On photo P7130081 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Such a great photo!

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 18:44 UTC as 2nd comment
On SampleImage:0118332998 (2 comments in total)

Such a great photo!

Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 18:44 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Olympus TG-4 real-world sample gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)

Such a great photo!

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 18:44 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

RichRMA: So some multi-billion $$$ bank is going to ask some photo (avg. earnings maybe $30k.year) to fork-over money (perhaps) or beg to use a skyline image with their building in it? What is WRONG with Europeans? Another good reason Britain should maintain a distance from the odious EU.

This way will be widespread. In short time the elite will want to create a unique world government with a single governor. USA, USE are only the start. Of course, all of this is for the underground resouces.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2015 at 22:06 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: So some multi-billion $$$ bank is going to ask some photo (avg. earnings maybe $30k.year) to fork-over money (perhaps) or beg to use a skyline image with their building in it? What is WRONG with Europeans? Another good reason Britain should maintain a distance from the odious EU.

Yah... Britain came with the idea of United States of Europe and now, while they are OK, EU became odious.

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2015 at 21:36 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Those are nice lenses that I could never afford.

I couldn't too, but I doubt anyone on this forum has a pocket size for such beasts.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2015 at 07:04 UTC
In reply to:

CopCarSS: They're planning to charge how much for a triplet? At $1699, they had better start thinking about re-introducing a Pinkham and Smith Bi-Quality. That's a classic lens I might actually consider spending $1700 on. But a triplet????

So does Sigma or Canon but with a much higher number of lenses. For that kind of money I would buy a Zeiss 100mm macro f/2 lens.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 12:37 UTC
In reply to:

fatdeeman: Or on ebay for like £5 you can get an old preset Tokina 135mm 3.5. It was sold under many names like the Samyang lenses of today, mine is a Sun Optical.

How d'ya like them bubbles?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/5048056825/in/photolist-8G5Bqv-5tbu5s-8WH3Vk-8WL6yh-8Wcoeh-8Wcoiq-8UPX1H-8UT1th-8UPWTv-8UTqKx-8UT15u-5t78cT

If someone need a sharp lens, there are plenty of 100mm 2.8 macro lenses. This Trioplan it's not supposed to deliver sharpness but a dreamy soft image, with swirly bokeh. 1700 $ is insane though. For that money I would rather buy the russian Hellios 85 1.5.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 09:53 UTC
Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »