certo666

Yeah, i regret not upgrading a few weeks ago. If you keep an eye on their junk mail they do have regular offers. I was offered ~€121 for an upgrade from V12. Guess I better save up

Well it's more difficult to achieve a shallow depth of field at a normal working distance with M43. The only problems I can foresee would possibly be autofocus, and the cost for these optics.

Would be interesting to see some faster primes than F1.2 for more background separation, though this is probably not feasible budget-wise...

They probably factored price into the mix

Free speech doesn't have to mean hate speech.

Have only begun testing but I'm a little disappointed with the portrait retouching mode so far. Maybe it was the specific photo I used, but it had trouble detecting faces. Has anyone got any...

I bought the Tamron not long ago. I don't think I would have spent an extra 300 for the Sigma (then again this could be buyers' affirmation bias talking :) ).

- If the wider focal length on the...

I can imagine Edina Monsoon from Ab Fab shouting "It's a Lacroix!" as this eyesore dangles around her neck.

Megapixels are not the only measure of image detail capture. The size of the lenses and sensors on smartphones pose some limitations. The periscope-style lens designs that are being developed at...

I think I found an article on this:
https://petapixel.com/2015/03/05/a-frog-riding-a-beetle-is-this-a-real-wildlife-photo-or-a-bunch-of-bs/

Exercise ankle-weights offer a cheaper compact alternative

Man on the Hill, any chance of seeing your portfolio?

I would argue that this technology would in fact *improve* the design of deep fakes by providing a means of testing.