tcdc12321

I used to read lenstip all the time, but because they gave a lens that anecdotally I think is really great a bad review, I am going to stop reading their reviews. Nikon's 24-70 f/4 is one of the ...

This is rather unfortunate, thank you for sharing. I keep wanting to consider the E-M5 III, as it checks so many different boxes for me: small and lightweight, newest Oly sensor, great IBIS, high ...

No new info as far as I know. They've been delayed before, so for all we know they could get delayed again.

DPReview did an IBIS comparison between the Z7 and A7R III where they found that the Sony outperformed the Nikon. It's interesting though because I've heard multiple people, including you, say ...

Like I posted earlier, I agree that every system has tradeoffs, and for many, a great vs. fantastic IBIS system makes little difference. But I disagree with your "I hate articles like this..." ...

Here's my read: this test confirmed what many of us already knew, which is that Olympus's IBIS/stabilization is class leading. This is no knock on the X-T4, in fact, it seems to me like the X-T4 ...

While I don't like the OP's tone or the example picture he or she provided, I agree with the OP's point, at least for landscapes. Large DOF isn't really an advantage because you can just stop down ...

I liked the feel of the dials when I tried them out at my camera store. The reason that I cannot consider the E-M5 III is the tripod mount issue. What a shame.

That's fair. I would mostly plan on using the Voigtlander for the sunstars and stitching panos together, but I like the idea of being able to do environmental portraits, ex. of flowers in a field, ...

Agreed that APS-C is a good compromise, in fact, I'm using APS-C now. I was very interested in using Fujifilm, but they don't have a good "walk-around" lens that I can use. The 16-55 f/2.8 is a ...

My biggest thing is I want a really good "walk-around" lens that I can leave on my camera a lot of the time, ideally with a 24-120 or more equivalent reach, to minimize lens swapping in the field. ...

Thank you, this is helpful. In DPReview's test of the A7R II's IBIS , they found that the stabilization is more effective at the long end than the wide end, and tests for other Sony cameras found ...

I appreciate the advice. You are right that all of those things contribute towards the sharpness of photos.

Hello, I am looking for your advice and experience when it comes to choosing a system for me to use when doing landscape photography, including quite a bit of backpacking or challenging day hikes. ...

I am wondering how many stops of stabilization that users of the 24-105 f/4 get in real world shooting scenarios? I've been researching this lens, but haven't been able to find out much about how ...

That's a great camera with a pretty so-so lens. Most standard M43 zooms have better IQ, but that's OK. I agree that the 16-80 feels great, and has amazing OIS and build quality. Plus it's WR.

Yes, I agree. Very good points about MFD. The only thing I don't 100% agree with you on is that stabilization trumps faster lenses...I'm 95% in agreement, except that at for telephoto (ex. at a ...

I'm not interested in weighing in on all of the bickering in this thread, but I want to address this point. Equivalence doesn't matter once bit if you're only working with one sensor size, be that ...

Except we don't know how well the Nikon 24-200 performs yet. The lens hasn't been released to the general public, and there are no reviews so far, at least to my knowledge. One forum member has ...

Thank you, this is fantastic information. I like the idea that an E-M1 II could basically mimic the HHHR feature of the E-M1 III, but I don't love that it comes at the cost of a lot more of your ...