leekil

Lives in United States New England, United States
Joined on Jan 21, 2009

Comments

Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

megared: better dynamic range goes to fuji follow this link
http://photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Fujifilm%20GFX%2050S,Nikon%20D800E,Sony%20ILCE-7RII

What are they doing to get the flat response from 3200-12800?

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 03:11 UTC
In reply to:

Stanislav Evstatiev: Just HAD to comment on this!
1. Compare? No? What's the ...
2. Low light (noise) performance - Just sliding a tiny bit down and seeing the text will give you a whole new level on how noise and contrast are a whole different level on the medium format.
3. Tiny vs FF in macro should give ADEQUATE understanding of FF vs MEDIUM? What is wrong with this word actually... Yep, they might be not sufficently bright lenses in the medium format to match 1.2 on FF, but how many 1.2 FF with more than a finger tip center sharpness can You list?
4. Portrait lens obviously start at 50mm for the most and goes to 100 mm for some pretty obvious perspective distortion reasons. Yes I've shot portraits with 8mm and it works - but these are not my USUAL ones :-) I've thought You shot the same shot along with the Fuji GFX 50S with Fujifilm GF 63mm f/2.8 R WR Lens on it? No? You didn't? Then what is the point of showing some sunset light unrelated portrait shot with one of the three best of FF world cameras?

The one on the right is the GFX, though its not totally blind, as I saw the other photos in the article.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 03:09 UTC
In reply to:

jleom: From today:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/police-falsely-told-a-man-he-couldn%e2%80%99t-film-them-%e2%80%98i%e2%80%99m-an-attorney%e2%80%99-he-said-%e2%80%98i-know-what-the-law-is%e2%80%99/ar-AAo6bN7?li=BBnb7Kz

The difference is that is someone is a jerk in a regular job, the consequences are quite a bit less severe. Usually no beatings, arrests, shootings, etc. There's a higher bar when there's more power involved; like how you have to get a license to drive a car, but not with a bike, because the consequences of messing up will have less of an effect on others.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 01:34 UTC
In reply to:

panchorancho: I film police all the time, just get a small unobtrusive camera. You can't expect low IQ government employees to understand complicated concepts like the Constitution and civil rights!

"What other profession has an error rate of a few questionable deaths/mistakes/faults out of 12 million actions?"

Many of them -- like teaching, working in a store, etc. Most of those professions usually don't involve weapons being carried on a daily basis, which boosts the likelihood of a serious injury or death when something goes wrong.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 01:31 UTC
In reply to:

Angrymagpie: The third picture of the Chinese opera singer putting on make-up is documentary photography at its best. I strive to uphold to such a standard.

I think it would be easy to take a picture *like* that one, but it might not have all the elements that would make it as good.

(Though there could also be better similar photos that weren't in the contest, as well.)

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2017 at 19:14 UTC
In reply to:

Scott Eaton: Good luck finding somebody locally to process the stuff, and if somebody wants me to set up a line for them I'm too expensive.

I stopped shooting E100 years before digital because Astia / Provia were light years better films. Fuji grabbed so much Kodak market share because E100's mediocre image quality and ancient materials like Kodachrome stuck around so long because of it. Truth hurts.

So, in a nutshell what this means is those of you who still haven't figured out digital can dust off your F3's and Leica's, and fill another shoe box or two with a bunch of processed 24x36mm emulsion in cardboard frames you can't do anything with because along with the demise of film processing few labs do film scanning, and those that still do will certainly do a dismal job. When you see retail scan of 35mm reversal film printed on paper you'll run screaming for your smartphone. Nothing like taking digital pictures of film vs the original scene because to some idiots that makes sense.

There's Dwayne's Photo in Kansas, which was also the last lab to develop Kodachrome

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 06:49 UTC

What is the green/magenta noise(?) in image #4 (the wheat). Is it moire? JPEG artifacts? lens flare?

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2016 at 04:29 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Trk: Let's be honest here, photo won because boy is from Africa, multicultural/migrant situation in EU, esp. UK. Photo does not communicate anything else. Complete nivelization od photography.
Rishi's review portrait photos are million times better.
I hope Donald's influence arrives soon here in EU.

How do you all feel about the previous winners?

http://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/twppp-2016/exhibition/past-winners.php

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 00:18 UTC
In reply to:

shigzeo: I guess I see myself in the winning image: fifteen or whatnot and sick of wearing the necktie and of the photographer. Wanting to get back to messing about with mates. But in all of that, the 37 year-old me is wondering: what's special about this winning image? What cultural or school-daze story does it really tell? Am I missing something? Is the entire story told in the frumpy suit, the tilted tie, the petulant look? If so, I've got dozens of winning portraits from my days in school taken by nothing more than snapshot school photographers with umbrellas.

> It's all PC, obvious statement about changing populace.

Not sure this has anything to do with changing populace. It was taken in South Africa, I think he is pretty much typical for the populace.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 00:12 UTC
In reply to:

biza43: Great images, and worthy winners. For all the nay-sayers:

Go out there, do better, come back, and share your great images...

I think the idea of people posting their own pictures is a good one. I'm not saying those picture would be better or worse, but it would be a lot more interesting than a bunch of complaining.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 00:08 UTC
In reply to:

jonny1976: what surprise and amazed me evrytime i see this award, i took part in many win sometimes also, is the complete lack of joy.
in the last 10 years every big award has been given to photo and theme who lack joy and happiness, colors.
I'm pretty sure photographer like mccurry in these era would have been completed undiscovered.

Though his most famous photo, the Afghan girl, is the opposite of joy.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 00:01 UTC
In reply to:

fpvnoob: Political correctness gone mad, I see this all the time.

At school they used to let the scruffy kid hold the rugby ball in school photos because they felt sorry for him and knew it would be nice and encouraging.

It won because the kid was black and the judge was probably some lesbian liberal who wants to heal the world.

Nothing to see here kids but just more evidence on why America voted trump.
People are sick of the BS.

The doomsday clock has not changed. There was a meeting this week to discuss it, but any changes will not be announced until next year.

https://www.wbez.org/shows/wbez-news/doomsday-clock-considers-impact-of-donald-trump/78ca9b14-5d0d-45d7-bf2b-b7db5763bfa3

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09 UTC
In reply to:

harpmaker: I doubt that it is compatible with TimeMachine on Macs.

I expect that it is compatible with Time Machine.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2016 at 04:38 UTC
In reply to:

WayneHuangPhoto: Get a RAVPower Filehub and use any hard drive you want to backup. Costs you all of $40 plus cost of HD.

The Seagate ones are SATA; WD are the ones who make them USB-only.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2016 at 04:35 UTC
On article Ricoh debuts colorful Theta SC (47 comments in total)
In reply to:

FLruckas: Somebody just needs to put this technology in a phone and just skip the external device.

@ronniemac Are you unhappy about the photographer being inadvertently in the photo, or the fact that the photographer is so close to the camera for when you want to be in the photo?

I haven't used one, but it seems to me based on what I have seen online that the way to get the photographer out of the photo is to hold the camera straight up above your head. It looks like the photographer is pretty well edited out of the photo via the software in these cases.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
On challenge Kodak Ektar 100 (15 comments in total)

I'm more of a Portra user, myself, though I plan to enter before the deadline.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 01:38 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

Eric Hensel: I've never understood why they don't fit the O-ring to the camera-side mount --sealing any lens attached, at one of it's most vulnerable spots.

It wouldn't matter anyway -- the back of the lens might be sealed, but not the other 90% of the lens.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2015 at 14:39 UTC
On article Did Sigma design the Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm F1.8? (200 comments in total)
In reply to:

goblin: I would have no problems whatsoever to know that Sigma designed my 75mm 1.8. I love Sigma.

Still:

- Olympus 75mm f1.8 lens: Officially announced on February 8, 2012. Prototypes in the works at least months prior to that. Rumored at least a month prior to the official announcement. Don't remember if there were photos leaked or not prior to the official announcement.

- Sigma patent: dated February 3, 2012.
So if the 75mm was their doing, they designed it, tested it, finalized it and ONLY AFTER thought about FILING a patent to protect their concept ?

I find this naive, at the least.

You only have to file for the patent before you put out the product. They definitely would have already planned to patent it.

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 04:08 UTC
In reply to:

JOrtiz: Unbealibable - meaning: I do not believe it. There is nothing (and I hope, nobody) holding the camera.

I was looking in the wrong place, I guess. But the actual traces of the arm are well hidden.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2012 at 21:35 UTC
In reply to:

JOrtiz: Unbealibable - meaning: I do not believe it. There is nothing (and I hope, nobody) holding the camera.

I think that the "dissolve into sand" part you are talking about is not a stitching error, but there is actually sand covering part of the vehicle.

I don't doubt there is an arm, but I am curious where it is attached.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2012 at 21:32 UTC
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »